AI- 5861
2.
P&Z Agenda Template
- Meeting Date:
- 06/09/2021
- Title:
- RZ21-05 (Barney)
- Submitted By:
- Robert Kirschmann, Development Services
- Department:
- Development Services
Presentation:
PowerPoint
NAME
of PRESENTER:
of PRESENTER:
Robert Kirschmann
TITLE
of PRESENTER:
of PRESENTER:
Planner II
Agenda Item Text:
Docket RZ21-05 (Barney) A request to amend the zoning of two parcels from RU-10 (one dwelling per 10 acres) to RU-4 (one dwelling per 4 acres).
Background:
The applicant is requesting to amend the zoning of two parcels from RU-10 (one dwelling per 10 acres) to RU-4 (one dwelling per 4 acres). The reason for the request is two-fold. First the applicant would like to ability to split his 15 acres (208-40-001P) into approximately 4 acres parcels. The second is to help the adjacent neighbor whose home is located on 5 acres, but with the ten-acre minimum zoning.
The parcels were zoned RU-10 in 1996 following Section 507 in the Zoning Regulations which state:
Lands under the authority of Cochise County at or after the time these Zoning Regulations become effective which have not been previously zoned by Cochise County, shall be subject to the regulations of an RU-10 (Rural) Zoning District if in a Category D (Rural) plan designation…until such time that the Zoning of such lands is amended in accordance with these Zoning Regulations.
A request was received in 1996 to rezone these parcels and several others to TR-36. At the time the parcels were unzoned. The request for these lots was withdrawn and the RU-10 became the default designation.
The parcels were zoned RU-10 in 1996 following Section 507 in the Zoning Regulations which state:
Lands under the authority of Cochise County at or after the time these Zoning Regulations become effective which have not been previously zoned by Cochise County, shall be subject to the regulations of an RU-10 (Rural) Zoning District if in a Category D (Rural) plan designation…until such time that the Zoning of such lands is amended in accordance with these Zoning Regulations.
A request was received in 1996 to rezone these parcels and several others to TR-36. At the time the parcels were unzoned. The request for these lots was withdrawn and the RU-10 became the default designation.