- Meeting Date:
- 04/05/2016
- Co-Submitter:
- Stacey Brechler-Knaggs
- From:
- Erin Young, Water Resources Manager
Information
TITLE:
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Executive Summary:
Upper Lake Mary (ULM) is an essential water source to the City of Flagstaff. Large-scale forest thinning efforts under the Flagstaff Watershed Protection Project (FWPP) and Four Forest Restoration Initiative (4FRI) are planned for the ULM watershed starting in 2019 and 2023, respectively. While there is limited research available regarding how altering the watershed by thinning a forest may change surface water runoff and aquifer recharge, the exact response of these hydrological conditions are largely unknown and should be documented. Utilities is recommending the City contract with SRP to maintain the flowtography equipment paid for by the Lake Mary-Walnut Creek Technical Advisory Committee in 2014. SRP has been monitoring 13,000 acres of watersheds within their service area for over a millennia, with the motto "We Measure It To Manage It." SRP has instrumented 12 watersheds of similar size, elevation, and forest type near Williams with the same equipment. One of the benefits of the City partnering with SRP is the continuity of data management across all of these watersheds.
Financial Impact:
In October 2015, the City's Budget Team approved a one-time ask of $47,860 in FY 2016 from the Utilities Contingency budget to maintain what is currently instrumented. Utilities budgeted $15,000 in FY 2016 to instrument two additional sites (202-08-304-1061-0-4290) and FWPP bond program (407-09-425-3277-1-4290) has budgeted $5,000 towards this project for a total project cost of $67,860 in FY 2016.
Connection to Council Goal and/or Regional Plan:
11) Ensure that we are as prepared as possible for extreme weather events
Has There Been Previous Council Decision on This:
Council supported purchasing the flowtography equipment on April 1, 2014 for $14,850.00.
Options and Alternatives:
Background/History:
In October 2015, Utilities approached the Budget Committee with a plan to fund SRP to continue their services at the sites. This ask to spend Utilities Contingency money was approved. Utilities is proposing the annual maintenance and data management of these sites be approved by Council for the FY17 budget. Additionally, Utilities recommends adding the cost for transducers at the six (6) flowtography sites and three (3) precipitation gauges to the FY17 budget, as well as on-going funds to maintain the equipment and manage the data. These equipment and data will round out Utilities Upper Lake Mary Watershed Monitoring Project and will be useful for making decisions on how to maintain the watershed in the future.
Key Considerations:
Baseline monitoring of the watershed includes flowtography (time-lapsed photo records of surface water runoff conditions in six (6) locations in the ULM watershed) and a USGS flow gage and sediment sampler in Newman Canyon (a significant tributary to ULM). Should Council adopt Utilities budget for FY17, three (3) precipitation gauges and six (6) pressure transducers will be installed in the ULM watershed to compliment the data being collected. The FY17 budget includes on-going dollars to support continues maintenance and data management of all equipment.
Expanded Financial Considerations:
The work we are conducting is actually part of the larger “Paired Watershed Study” that was incorporated into the Four Forests Restoration Initiative Record of Decision. The contract and proposals are to support operation and maintenance of equipment that SRP has already installed. For one, it has been proven very difficult for another agency (Rocky Mountain Research Station) to successfully take over the operation, maintenance and data management of the equipment due to the incredible amount of unique design and large data files to manage and share with the public. If we were to try to contract out operation, maintenance and data management to a consulting firm or agency we risk losing data as well as likely having to pay them to get up to speed on processing the information. Additionally, SRP has instrumented 12 watersheds in the Williams area with the same equipment. It only makes sense for project continuity to contract with SRP. If we chose not to, there is a risk to the Paired Watershed Study that the information collected in Williams and in Flagstaff would not be use-able to draw comparisons.
For these reasons, it has been determined that a Sole Source Justification is appropriate in this case. A copy of the Article 18 Sole Source Procurement documentation is included as an attachment.
Community Benefits and Considerations:
As of November 2015, all information collected within the ULM watershed will be made available to the public.
Community Involvement:
Consult
Involve
Collaborate
Empower
Attachments
- Sole Source Procurement Attachment
- Agreement
- DRAFT-SRP Flowtography Independent Contractor Agreement
- Proposal A
- Proposal B
- Proposal C