- Meeting Date:
- 12/06/2016
- From:
- Sara Dechter, AICP, Comprehensive Planning Manager
TITLE:
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
2) Review Substantive Changes listed in Attachment #3 and take any additional public comment
3) Close Public Hearing
4) Read Resolution No. 2016-31 by title only
5) City Clerk reads Resolution No. 2016-31
6) Adopt Resolution No.2016-31
Executive Summary:
- Changes proposed to major plan amendment categories and criteria (with options for addressing changes from Rural to Suburban Area Types),
- Clarifications regarding minor plan amendment categories and procedures,
- Adopt a clear and legally accurate description of specific plans,
- Clarifications about the role of the City Council, and
- Non-substantive editorial changes to the Chapter.
The reasons for these proposed changes are because of factual errors in some of the language, vague descriptions that make it difficult to understand the categories for amendments, incomplete information about the relationship of the Plan to other laws and regulations, and illogical gaps in the categories provided in the ratified Regional Plan.
Financial Impact:
Policy Impact:
Connection to Council Goal and/or Regional Plan:
COUNCIL GOALS:
7) Continue to implement the Flagstaff Regional Plan and focus efforts on specific plans
8) Improve effectiveness of notification, communication, and engagement with residents, neighborhoods and businesses and about City services, programs, policies, projects and developments
REGIONAL PLAN:
Policy CC.1.3. Design development patterns to maintain the open character of rural areas, protect open lands, and protect and maintain sensitive environmental areas like mountains, canyons, and forested settings.
Policy LU.1.1. Plan for and support reinvestment within the existing city centers and neighborhoods for increased employment and quality of life.
Policy LU.1.6. Establish greater flexibility in development standards and processes to assist developers in overcoming challenges posed by redevelopment and infill sites.
Policy NH.6.1. Promote quality redevelopment and infill projects that are contextual with surrounding neighborhoods. When planning for redevelopment, the needs of existing residents should be addressed as early as possible in the development process.
Goal ED.1. Create a healthy environment for business by ensuring transparent, expeditious, and predictable government processes.
Policy ED.1.2. Steadily improve access to easily understandable public information.
Has There Been Previous Council Decision on This:
Options and Alternatives:
Background and History:
- Major plan amendments must be completed prior to submittal of rezoning or annexation applications; A 60 day review of the proposed major plan amendments is required by specific agencies and anyone who requests such opportunities;
- Planning and Zoning Commission will hold two or more public hearings at different locations within the municipality to promote citizen participation; and
- The City Council will review all major plan amendments at a single public hearing during the calendar year the proposal is made
Flagstaff City Code Title 11-10, General Plan Amendment, further refines the procedures by adding the requirement for a neighborhood meeting or Citizen Review Session, and by providing procedures for minor plan amendments and adoption of new elements. In Flagstaff, minor plan amendments do not require a review period and only require one public hearing with the Commission before presentation to the Council. Minor plan amendment applications can be processed concurrent with applications for rezoning and annexations.
In June 2014, approximately a year after adopting the Regional Plan, the Council adopted amendments to Title 11 to clarify procedures and to remove content that related to the previous version of the Plan. Clarifications about submittal requirements were also needed, but these were put on hold pending completion of the Chapter 3 plan amendment and consideration of how to address impact analyses for major and minor plan amendments and specific plans.
The Regional Plan provides the last piece of the major plan amendment puzzle by establishing categories of amendments that will be subject to the major plan amendment procedures found in A.R.S 9-461.06 and Title 11 of the City Code. Chapter 3 of the document also describes the status of specific plans and how they relate to the General Plan, as well as how the plan will be used by City staff and the community.
Key Considerations:
The key considerations for this decision are whether or not the proposed amendments to Chapter 3 will:
- Provide for clear and effective implementation of the Flagstaff Regional Plan,
- Accurately reflect the legal environment of plan implementation,
- Promote a fair and predictable government process applicants, and
- Give the community ample opportunity to participate in decisions regarding plan amendments of all types.
Expanded Options and Alternatives:
Involve - Staff provided a traditional public review period and posted the sections that changed the most on the Flagstaff Community Forum for the public to comment on and share ideas about how the changes could be different or clearer.
Attachments
- Res. 2016-31
- 2 - Chapter 3 Proposed Replacement Pages
- 3 - List of Substantive Changes Proposed
- 4 - Policy Implications
- 5 - Chapter 16 Replacement Page
- Chapter 3 - Track Changes