- Meeting Date:
- 07/01/2014
- From:
- Stephanie Smith, Assistant to City Manager
Information
TITLE:
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
2) City Clerk reads Resolution No. 2014-28 by title only (if approved above)
3) Adopt Resolution No. 2014-28
Policy Decision or Reason for Action:
Financial Impact:
Connection to Council Goal:
5. Retain, expand, and diversify economic base
11. Effective governance
Has There Been Previous Council Decision on This:
Options and Alternatives:
Do not approve the bond question to be placed on the November 4, 2014 general election.
Background/History:
Over the past two years, the City of Flagstaff has reviewed the current condition of Flagstaff streets and discussed possible scope and financing to fund repairs to existing street infrastructure (including some sidewalks, curbs, ADA ramps, and bike lane restriping) and underlying utility infrastructure. The following is a summary of past City action and discussion:
2010: Street and Utility Bond Initiative
November 2012: Completed analysis on the condition and improvement costs of critical City infrastructure
March 2013: First regional coordination meeting
April 2013: Council discussion on project approach
July 2013: Reallocation of $1M for FY15 Budget
September 2013: Council discussion on funding proposals and direction to form Citizen Committee
November 2013:Citizen Survey
January – March 2014: Citizen Committee
April 2014: Citizen Committee recommendation presented to City Council
May 2014: Focus Groups and Survey Results
June 2014: Ballot options presented to City Council
Key Considerations:
- fund repairs to existing street infrastructure (including adjacent sidewalks, curbs, ADA ramps, and bike lane restriping)
- fund repairs to utilities infrastructure underlying roads that need also to be repaired
- commit to the public that in addition to improving Flagstaff roads, the City will also commit resources to preserving the investment that improved the road condition
-
fund repairs with a 1/3 cent sales tax increase over a 20 year term
Based on past advice from bond counsel, there will be no charge for pro/con statements for the Informational Pamphlet since this involves the issuance of bonds.