CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
TUESDAY, JULY 6, 2021
CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
211 WEST ASPEN AVE
3:00 P.M.
TUESDAY, JULY 6, 2021
CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
211 WEST ASPEN AVE
3:00 P.M.
MINUTES
1.
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Deasy called the meeting of the Flagstaff City Council held July 6, 2021, to order at 3:01 p.m.
Mayor Deasy called the meeting of the Flagstaff City Council held July 6, 2021, to order at 3:01 p.m.
NOTICE OF OPTION TO RECESS INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION
Pursuant to A.R.S. §38-431.02, notice is hereby given to the members of the City Council and to the general public that, at this regular meeting, the City Council may vote to go into executive session, which will not be open to the public, for legal advice and discussion with the City’s attorneys for legal advice on any item listed on the following agenda, pursuant to A.R.S. §38-431.03(A)(3).
2.
ROLL CALL
- Present:
-
- Mayor Paul Deasy
- Vice Mayor Becky Daggett
- Councilmember Austin Aslan
- Councilmember Jim McCarthy
- Councilmember Regina Salas
- Councilmember Adam Shimoni
- Councilmember Miranda Sweet
- Staff:
- City Manager Greg Clifton; City Attorney Sterling Solomon
3.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE AND MISSION STATEMENT
The Council and audience recited the pledge of allegiance and Councilmember Sweet read the Mission Statement of the City of Flagstaff.
The Council and audience recited the pledge of allegiance and Councilmember Sweet read the Mission Statement of the City of Flagstaff.
MISSION STATEMENT
The mission of the City of Flagstaff is to protect and enhance the quality of life for all.
4.
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
Public Participation enables the public to address the Council about an item that is not on the agenda. Comments relating to items that are on the agenda will be taken at the time that the item is discussed. If you wish to address the Council at tonight's meeting, please complete a comment card and submit it to the recording clerk as soon as possible. Your name will be called when it is your turn to speak. You may address the Council up to three times throughout the meeting, including comments made during Public Participation. Please limit your remarks to three minutes per item to allow everyone an opportunity to speak. At the discretion of the Chair, ten or more persons present at the meeting and wishing to speak may appoint a representative who may have no more than fifteen minutes to speak.
Public Participation enables the public to address the Council about an item that is not on the agenda. Comments relating to items that are on the agenda will be taken at the time that the item is discussed. If you wish to address the Council at tonight's meeting, please complete a comment card and submit it to the recording clerk as soon as possible. Your name will be called when it is your turn to speak. You may address the Council up to three times throughout the meeting, including comments made during Public Participation. Please limit your remarks to three minutes per item to allow everyone an opportunity to speak. At the discretion of the Chair, ten or more persons present at the meeting and wishing to speak may appoint a representative who may have no more than fifteen minutes to speak.
None
5.
APPOINTMENTS
Pursuant to A.R.S. §38-431.02, notice is hereby given to the members of the City Council and to the general public that the City Council may vote to go into executive session, which will not be open to the public, for the purpose of discussing or considering employment, assignment, appointment, promotion, demotion, dismissal, salaries, disciplining or resignation of a public officer, appointee, or employee of any public body...., pursuant to A.R.S. §38-431.03(A)(1).
Pursuant to A.R.S. §38-431.02, notice is hereby given to the members of the City Council and to the general public that the City Council may vote to go into executive session, which will not be open to the public, for the purpose of discussing or considering employment, assignment, appointment, promotion, demotion, dismissal, salaries, disciplining or resignation of a public officer, appointee, or employee of any public body...., pursuant to A.R.S. §38-431.03(A)(1).
A.
Consideration of Appointments: Beautification and Public Art Commission.
Moved by Councilmember Miranda Sweet, seconded by Councilmember Jim McCarthy to appoint Anthony Garcia for a term expiring June 2024.
Vote: 7 - 0 - Unanimously
Moved by Mayor Paul Deasy, seconded by Councilmember Adam Shimoni to appoint Tina Zecher for a term expiring June 2024.
Vote: 7 - 0 - Unanimously
Moved by Councilmember Adam Shimoni, seconded by Mayor Paul Deasy to appoint Matt McGrath for a term expiring June 2024.
Vote: 7 - 0 - Unanimously
Moved by Councilmember Regina Salas, seconded by Mayor Paul Deasy to appoint Carla McCord for a term expiring June 2022.
Vote: 7 - 0 - Unanimously
6.
CONSENT ITEMS
All matters under Consent Agenda are considered by the City Council to be routine and will be enacted by one motion approving the recommendations listed on the agenda. Unless otherwise indicated, expenditures approved by Council are budgeted items.
Moved by Mayor Paul Deasy, seconded by Councilmember Jim McCarthy to approve the Consent Agenda as presented.
Vote: 7 - 0 - Unanimously
A.
Consideration and Approval of Final Plat: Request from Rhino Holdings Flagstaff LLC for Sears Redevelopment Final Plat (PZ-21-00025-02), a commercial subdivision containing three (3) lots located at 4800 N. Highway 89 in the HC (Highway Commercial) zone.
Approve the final plat and authorize the Mayor to sign the plat and City Subdivider Agreement when notified by staff that the documents are ready for recording.
Approve the final plat and authorize the Mayor to sign the plat and City Subdivider Agreement when notified by staff that the documents are ready for recording.
B.
Consideration and Approval of Cooperative Purchase Contract: Purchase of All-Risk Velocity Fire Engine from Hughes Fire Equipment, Inc. in the amount of $749,343.27.
- Approve the cooperative purchase contract of a new Pierce Manufacturing, Inc. All-Risk Velocity Fire Engine in the amount of $749,343.27 from Hughes Fire Equipment, Inc. through a cooperative purchase contract with the City of Mesa; and
- Authorize the City Manager to execute the necessary documents.
C.
Consideration and Approval of Contract: Water Loading Station Installation and Maintenance Contract with Flowpoint Environmental Systems, Inc.
- Approve the Water Loading Station Installation and Maintenance Contract with Flowpoint Environmental Systems, Inc., in the amount of $73,528.97, plus applicable tax, $6,000.00 annually for software maintenance, and time and materials for hardware maintenance; and
- Authorize the City Manager to execute the necessary documents.
D.
Consideration and Approval of the Cooperative Purchase Contract: Beta Public Relations, LLC in the amount of $55,807.24 for public outreach services during the construction of the Coconino Estates Improvements Phase II Project.
- Approve the Cooperative Purchase Contract with Beta Public Relations, LLC in the amount of $55,807.24 and a contract duration of 540-calendar days; and
- Authorize the City Manager to execute the necessary documents.
E.
Consideration and Approval of Final Plat: Case No. PZ-15-00115-17, VP 66 & Woody Mountain, LLC requests Final Plat approval for Timber Sky Phase 2 Final Block Plat, a subdivision consisting of six (6) blocks, three (3) tracts, and rights-of-way on 120 acres, located at 3425 W Route 66 in the R1, Single-Family Residential zone, the MR, Medium Density Residential zone and Public Open Space (POS) zone.
Approve the final plat and authorize the Mayor to sign both the final plat and the City/Subdivider Agreement when notified by staff that all documents are ready for signature and recordation.
Approve the final plat and authorize the Mayor to sign both the final plat and the City/Subdivider Agreement when notified by staff that all documents are ready for signature and recordation.
F.
Consideration and Approval of Contract: Purchase of an Aardvark Tactical small chassis robot in the amount of $63,855, with 100% funding from U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) through AZ Department of Homeland Security and the Northern Arizona Metro Board.
- Approve the Contract with Aardvark Tactical in the amount of $63,855. Where $20,000 was awarded by the AZ Department of Homeland Security and the remaining $43,855 was awarded and approved by the local Metro Board toward the purchase of this robot; and
- Direct the City Manager to complete the necessary documents.
G.
Consideration and Approval of Contract: Contract with Eurofins Eaton Analytical, LLC, Bio-Aquatic Testing, Inc., and TestAmerica Laboratories, Inc. for laboratory testing of water, wastewater, sludge, and soil samples - not to exceed $132,244.
- Approve contracts with the following three laboratories: Eurofins Eaton Analytical, LLC, Bio-Aquatic Testing, Inc., and TestAmerica Laboratories, Inc. Each contract will be for an initial term of three years and each contract will include two annual extensions upon mutual agreement.
- Authorize the City Manager to execute all necessary documents.
H.
Consideration and approval of Grant Agreement: To the U.S. Department of Justice, through the Arizona Criminal Justice Commission, for the Edward Byrne Justice Assistance Grant funds in the amount of $283,494.00 for the Northern Arizona Street Crimes Task Force (METRO unit).
Approve the acceptance of the grant from the U.S. Department of Justice, through the Arizona Criminal Justice Commission, Edward Byrne Justice Assistance Grant funds in the amount of $283,494.00 for FY2022.
Approve the acceptance of the grant from the U.S. Department of Justice, through the Arizona Criminal Justice Commission, Edward Byrne Justice Assistance Grant funds in the amount of $283,494.00 for FY2022.
I.
Consideration and Approval of Grant Agreement: State of Arizona 911 grant for Coconino County GIS project.
Approve the Grant Agreement with AZ State 911 Office for the Datamark GIS project for grant funds in the amount of $133,624.27 which will pay for the project in full.
Approve the Grant Agreement with AZ State 911 Office for the Datamark GIS project for grant funds in the amount of $133,624.27 which will pay for the project in full.
J.
Consideration and Approval of Grant Agreement: Arizona 911 Grant Agreement between Arizona Department of Administration and the City of Flagstaff acting as System Administrator for Coconino County.
Approve the acceptance of the grant from the Arizona Department of Administration Office in the amount of $533,943 for the 911 budget for Coconino County FY2021-2022.
Approve the acceptance of the grant from the Arizona Department of Administration Office in the amount of $533,943 for the 911 budget for Coconino County FY2021-2022.
K.
Consideration and Approval of Multiple Contracts: On-Call Legal Services Contracts.
Award contracts for "On-Call Legal Services" to the following eight (8) firms, and authorize the City Manager to execute the necessary documents:
Award contracts for "On-Call Legal Services" to the following eight (8) firms, and authorize the City Manager to execute the necessary documents:
- Coppersmith Brockelman;
- Dickinson Wright;
- Gust Rosenfeld;
- Hufford, Horstman, Mongini, Parnell and Tucker;
- Jackson Lewis;
- Jones, Skelton and Hochuli;
- Struck Love Bojanowski and Acedo;
- TSL Law Group
7.
ROUTINE ITEMS
A.
Consideration and Adoption of Resolution No. 2021-32 and Ordinance No. 2021-16: A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Flagstaff, Coconino County, Arizona, declaring as a public record that certain document filed with the City Clerk and entitled "PZ-21-00066 Updates to Zoning Code 2021 – Accessory Dwelling Unit and Accessory Structure Encroachments Requirements;" and, an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Flagstaff, Coconino County, Arizona, amending the Flagstaff City Code, Title 10, Flagstaff Zoning Code, to modify the existing Accessory Dwelling Unit and Accessory Structure Encroachment Requirements.
Councilmember McCarthy clarified that rear setbacks for homes are defined by the zoning of a property and noted that the proposed update would reduce those setbacks. He inquired of Zoning Code Manager Dan Symer whether the public had been given the opportunity to provide input and what outreach efforts had been made. Mr. Symer responded that there had been two public work sessions, two newspaper advertisements, and additional public outreach conducted by staff.
Moved by Councilmember Jim McCarthy, seconded by Councilmember Adam Shimoni to adopt Resolution No. 2021-32, with an amendment prohibiting windows on the rear elevation of Accessory Dwelling Units.
Councilmember McCarthy explained that while windows on the sides and front would still be allowed, this restriction would help address privacy concerns, specifically, the impact of having windows as close as five feet to a neighboring property line.
Mr. Symer clarified that the proposed amendment would apply to ADUs that encroach into the zone’s standard setback, specifically stating that no windows would be allowed on the rear elevation in such cases. Councilmember McCarthy confirmed that intent and reiterated that the restriction would only apply when ADUs are built within the reduced setback, and would not affect window placement on the sides or front of the units.
Councilmember Shimoni expressed that he had some concerns with the amendment but appreciated Councilmember McCarthy’s perspective.
Vice Mayor Daggett stated that while she understood the concern, she preferred not to add further restrictions to the proposed regulations.
Mayor Deasy commented that he did not see rear windows as a significant privacy issue and voiced his opposition to the amendment.
Councilmember Aslan noted that he did not have strong feelings on the issue but was willing to support Councilmember McCarthy’s amendment.
Vote: 2 - 5
- AYE:
-
Councilmember Austin Aslan
Councilmember Jim McCarthy
Moved by Councilmember Adam Shimoni, seconded by Mayor Paul Deasy to adopt Resolution No. 2021-32.
Vote: 7 - 0 - Unanimously
Moved by Mayor Paul Deasy, seconded by Councilmember Miranda Sweet to read Ordinance No. 2021-16 by title only for the final time.
Vote: 7 - 0 - Unanimously
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FLAGSTAFF, AMENDING THE FLAGSTAFF CITY CODE, TITLE 10, FLAGSTAFF ZONING CODE, BY ADOPTING BY REFERENCE THAT CERTAIN DOCUMENT ENTITLED “CASE NO. PZ-21-00066 UPDATES TO ZONING CODE 2021 – ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT AND ACCESSORY STRUCTURE ENCROACHMENTS REQUIREMENTS”; PROVIDING FOR PENALTIES, REPEAL OF CONFLICTING ORDINANCES, SEVERABILITY, AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE
Moved by Mayor Paul Deasy, seconded by Vice Mayor Becky Daggett to adopt Ordinance No. 2021-16.
Vote: 7 - 0 - Unanimously
B.
Consideration and Adoption of Resolution No. 2021-33 and Ordinance No. 2021-17: A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Flagstaff, Coconino County, Arizona, declaring as a public record that certain document filed with the City Clerk and entitled "Case No. PZ-19-00123 Updates to Zoning Code 2019 – Neighborhood Community Commercial;" and, an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Flagstaff, Coconino County, Arizona, amending the Flagstaff City Code, Title 10, Flagstaff Zoning Code, to modify the Zoning Code to include a new zone called Neighborhood Community Commercial (NCC).
Steve Finch, Executive Director of Flagstaff Lodging, Tourism, and Restaurant Association, addressed Council and spoke against the creation of a Neighborhood Community Commercial zone.
Vice Mayor Daggett expressed that she has been conflicted about the proposal from the beginning. While she understands and respects the desires of historic neighborhoods advocating for the zoning change, she also recognizes the concerns raised by Mr. Finch and other community members regarding the importance of higher housing density and carbon neutrality goals. She emphasized that while she does not want to waste time, she believes a public discussion on the topic is necessary and indicated she could support the proposal following that engagement.
Councilmember Shimoni agreed with Vice Mayor Daggett’s comments. He stated that he is generally comfortable with the creation of the new zone but does not want to waste staff or public resources. He emphasized the importance of being respectful to neighborhood concerns and noted that while he is open to moving forward, he has reservations.
Councilmember McCarthy voiced his support for the proposal. He stated that he is in favor of implementing the zoning changes.
Councilmember Sweet noted that although she feels torn on the issue, she will support the item. She stated her intention to honor the wishes of the community in making her decision.
Councilmember Salas stated her opposition to the proposal. She expressed that it runs counter to the city’s broader goals related to carbon neutrality and increasing housing density.
Mayor Deasy stated his support for the resolution.
Vice Mayor Daggett expressed that she has been conflicted about the proposal from the beginning. While she understands and respects the desires of historic neighborhoods advocating for the zoning change, she also recognizes the concerns raised by Mr. Finch and other community members regarding the importance of higher housing density and carbon neutrality goals. She emphasized that while she does not want to waste time, she believes a public discussion on the topic is necessary and indicated she could support the proposal following that engagement.
Councilmember Shimoni agreed with Vice Mayor Daggett’s comments. He stated that he is generally comfortable with the creation of the new zone but does not want to waste staff or public resources. He emphasized the importance of being respectful to neighborhood concerns and noted that while he is open to moving forward, he has reservations.
Councilmember McCarthy voiced his support for the proposal. He stated that he is in favor of implementing the zoning changes.
Councilmember Sweet noted that although she feels torn on the issue, she will support the item. She stated her intention to honor the wishes of the community in making her decision.
Councilmember Salas stated her opposition to the proposal. She expressed that it runs counter to the city’s broader goals related to carbon neutrality and increasing housing density.
Mayor Deasy stated his support for the resolution.
Moved by Councilmember Austin Aslan, seconded by Councilmember Jim McCarthy to adopt Resolution No. 2021-33.
Vote: 6 - 1
- NAY:
-
Councilmember Regina Salas
Moved by Mayor Paul Deasy, seconded by Councilmember Jim McCarthy to read Ordinance 2021-17 by title only for the final time.
Vote: 6 - 1
- NAY:
-
Councilmember Regina Salas
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FLAGSTAFF, AMENDING THE FLAGSTAFF CITY CODE, TITLE 10, FLAGSTAFF ZONING CODE, BY ADOPTING BY REFERENCE THAT CERTAIN DOCUMENT ENTITLED “CASE NO. PZ-19-00123 UPDATES TO ZONING CODE 2019 – NEIGHBORHOOD COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL (NCC)”; PROVIDING FOR PENALTIES, REPEAL OF CONFLICTING ORDINANCES, SEVERABILITY, AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE
Moved by Councilmember Jim McCarthy, seconded by Mayor Paul Deasy to adopt Ordinance No. 2021-17.
Vote: 6 - 1
- NAY:
-
Councilmember Regina Salas
C.
Consideration and Adoption of Ordinance No. 2021-14: An ordinance levying upon the assessed valuation of the property within the City of Flagstaff, Arizona, subject to taxation a certain sum upon each one hundred dollars ($100.00) of valuation sufficient to raise the amount estimated to be required in the Annual Budget, less the amount estimated to be received from other sources of revenue; providing funds for various bond redemptions, for the purpose of paying interest upon bonded indebtedness and providing funds for general municipal expenses, all for the Fiscal Year ending the 30th day of June 2022. (Primary and secondary property tax levies for FY 2021-2022)
Councilmember McCarthy asked whether the proposed changes would result in an increase in city property taxes. Management Services Director Rick Tadder responded that the answer depends on how the question is framed. He explained that while the overall tax rates are decreasing, new construction could lead to increased property tax revenues due to higher assessed valuations. However, he noted that, on average, property taxes are expected to remain relatively flat.
Moved by Mayor Paul Deasy, seconded by Councilmember Jim McCarthy to read Ordinance No. 2021-14 by title only for the final time.
Vote: 7 - 0 - Unanimously
AN ORDINANCE LEVYING UPON THE ASSESSED VALUATION OF THE PROPERTY WITHIN THE CITY OF FLAGSTAFF, ARIZONA, SUBJECT TO TAXATION A CERTAIN SUM UPON EACH ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($100.00) OF VALUATION SUFFICIENT TO RAISE THE AMOUNT ESTIMATED TO BE REQUIRED IN THE ANNUAL BUDGET, LESS THE AMOUNT ESTIMATED TO BE RECEIVED FROM OTHER SOURCES OF REVENUE; PROVIDING FUNDS FOR VARIOUS BOND REDEMPTIONS, FOR THE PURPOSE OF PAYING INTEREST UPON BONDED INDEBTEDNESS AND PROVIDING FUNDS FOR GENERAL MUNICIPAL EXPENSES, ALL FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING THE 30TH DAY OF JUNE, 2022
Moved by Mayor Paul Deasy, seconded by Councilmember Miranda Sweet to adopt Ordinance 2021-14.
Vote: 7 - 0 - Unanimously
D.
Consideration and Adoption of Ordinance No. 2021-15: An ordinance of the City Council of the City of Flagstaff, authorizing the acquisition of real property for the Lone Tree Overpass Project; providing for delegation of authority, subsequent council approvals, severability, and establishing an effective date
Moved by Mayor Paul Deasy, seconded by Councilmember Miranda Sweet to read Ordinance No. 2021-15 by title only for the final time.
Vote: 7 - 0 - Unanimously
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FLAGSTAFF, AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF REAL PROPERTY FOR THE LONE TREE OVERPASS PROJECT; PROVIDING FOR DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY, SUBSEQUENT COUNCIL APPROVALS, SEVERABILITY, AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE
Moved by Mayor Paul Deasy, seconded by Councilmember Miranda Sweet to adopt Ordinance No. 2021-15.
Vote: 7 - 0 - Unanimously
E.
Consideration and Approval of Contract: Change Order No. 15 with Shephard Wesnitzer, Inc. in the amount of $97,500.00 and add 235 calendar days for the Rio de Flag Flood Control Utility Relocation design services contract
Project Manager Trevor Henry and Real Estate Manager Bryce Doty provided a PowerPoint presentation that covered the following:
PROJECT AREA
HISTORY OF DESIGN SERVICES WITH SHEPARD WESNITZER, INC.
PROJECT UPDATE
USACE
REAL ESTATE
CONCLUSION WITH ADOT RIO DE FLAG BRIDGE
PROJECT AREA
HISTORY OF DESIGN SERVICES WITH SHEPARD WESNITZER, INC.
PROJECT UPDATE
USACE
REAL ESTATE
CONCLUSION WITH ADOT RIO DE FLAG BRIDGE
Moved by Mayor Paul Deasy, seconded by Vice Mayor Becky Daggett to approve Change Order No. 15 with Shephard Wesnitzer, Inc. the amount of $97,500.00, add 235 calendar days to the design services contract, and authorize the City Manager to execute the necessary documents.
Vote: 7 - 0 - Unanimously
F.
Consideration and Approval of Cooperative Purchase Contract: Arizona Department of Transportation Milton Road Underpass/BNSF Railway Bridge Replacement Concept Analysis Phase II - Award of Design Phase Services Cooperative Purchase Contract to WSP USA, Inc., for a feasibility study, in an amount not to exceed $149,614.00, under a City of Tucson cooperative purchasing agreement (#181820-01).
Project Manager Christine Cameron provided a PowerPoint presentation that covered the following:
AGENDA
DOWNTOWN MILE – LOCAL PROJECTS
BNSF RAILWAY MITIGATION
NORTH BRIDGE CONCEPT
RAISE GRANT
SCHEDULE
AGENDA
DOWNTOWN MILE – LOCAL PROJECTS
BNSF RAILWAY MITIGATION
NORTH BRIDGE CONCEPT
RAISE GRANT
SCHEDULE
Moved by Mayor Paul Deasy, seconded by Vice Mayor Becky Daggett to award the Design Phase Services Cooperative Purchase Contract to WSP USA, Inc. (WSP), for a feasibility study, in an amount not to exceed $149,614.00, with a 270 calendar-day contract period and authorize the City Manager to execute the necessary documents.
Vote: 7 - 0 - Unanimously
A break was called from 4:28 p.m. through 4:40 p.m.
8.
REGULAR AGENDA
A.
Consideration and Adoption of Ordinance No. 2021-06: An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Flagstaff, amending the Flagstaff Zoning Map to rezone approximately 11 acres of real property generally located at 151 West High Country Trail, APNs 112-05-001W and 112-05-011 from the Estate Residential (ER) zone to the Medium Density Residential (MR) zone with conditions, providing for severability, authority for clerical corrections, and establishing an effective date.
Current Planning Manager Alexandra Pucciarelli provided a PowerPoint presentation that covered the following:
AURA FLAGSTAFF DIRECT TO ORDINANCE ZONING MAP AMENDMENT
ALTERNATE DENSITY
PROPOSED DENSITY
Councilmember Sweet spoke about the different interpretations of the regional plan and the pros and cons of the project. She stated that she is in favor of the project.
The following individuals addressed Council in support of the rezone:
Councilmember Aslan stated that he does not support the counterproposal.
Councilmember Shimoni noted the developer’s responsiveness to community and Council input and expressed support for the project, highlighting the affordable housing component.
Councilmember McCarthy stated he would like to support the project but emphasized neighborhood concerns and the need to uphold the zoning code's intent. He objected to the inclusion of a two-acre unused parcel and said he might support a revised project limited to 137 units, but not the current proposal.
AURA FLAGSTAFF DIRECT TO ORDINANCE ZONING MAP AMENDMENT
ALTERNATE DENSITY
PROPOSED DENSITY
Councilmember Sweet spoke about the different interpretations of the regional plan and the pros and cons of the project. She stated that she is in favor of the project.
The following individuals addressed Council in support of the rezone:
- Kyle Nitschke
- Tyler Denham
- Devonna McLaughlin
- Phil Goldblatt
- Sheila Duffie
- Todd Boyle
Councilmember Aslan stated that he does not support the counterproposal.
Councilmember Shimoni noted the developer’s responsiveness to community and Council input and expressed support for the project, highlighting the affordable housing component.
Councilmember McCarthy stated he would like to support the project but emphasized neighborhood concerns and the need to uphold the zoning code's intent. He objected to the inclusion of a two-acre unused parcel and said he might support a revised project limited to 137 units, but not the current proposal.
Moved by Councilmember Adam Shimoni, seconded by Councilmember Miranda Sweet to read Ordinance No. 2021-06 by title only for the final time.
Vice Mayor Daggett asked about zoning approval without a finalized Development Agreement (DA). Senior Assistant City Attorney Christina Rubalcava clarified that the ordinance is conditioned upon DA approval, if the DA is not approved, the rezone does not take effect.
City Attorney Sterling Solomon clarified that the current motion does not include the 137-unit cap from the ordinance’s first reading. Ms. Rublacava confirmed this and reiterated it was to allow the 160 units as proposed.
Councilmember Salas stated her support for the ordinance, based on the required three findings.
Vote: 4 - 3
- NAY:
-
Mayor Paul Deasy
Councilmember Austin Aslan
Councilmember Jim McCarthy
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FLAGSTAFF, AMENDING THE FLAGSTAFF ZONING MAP TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 11 ACRES OF REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 151 WEST HIGH COUNTRY TRAIL, APN 112-05-001W and 112-05-011, FROM THE ESTATE RESIDENTIAL (ER) ZONE TO THE MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (MR) ZONE WITH CONDITIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AUTHORITY FOR CLERICAL CORRECTIONS; AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE
Moved by Councilmember Adam Shimoni, seconded by Councilmember Regina Salas to adopt Ordinance No. 2021-06.
Vote: 4 - 3
- NAY:
-
Mayor Paul Deasy
Councilmember Austin Aslan
Councilmember Jim McCarthy
B.
Consideration and Adoption of Resolution No. 2021-12: A resolution of the City Council of the City of Flagstaff, Arizona, authorizing the execution of a Development Agreement between Auza Flagstaff, LLC and Trinsic Acquisition Company, LLC, and the City of Flagstaff related to the development of approximately 11 acres of real property generally located at 151 West High Country Trail, APNs 112-05-001W and 112-05-011 in Flagstaff, Arizona and establishing an effective date. (Aura Flagstaff Development Agreement)
Moved by Councilmember Adam Shimoni, seconded by Vice Mayor Becky Daggett to read Resolution No. 2021-12 by title only.
Vote: 4 - 3
- NAY:
-
Mayor Paul Deasy
Councilmember Austin Aslan
Councilmember Jim McCarthy
A RESOLUTION OF THE FLAGSTAFF CITY COUNCIL, AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN AUZA FLAGSTAFF, LLC AND TRINSIC ACQUISITION COMPANY, LLC, AND THE CITY OF FLAGSTAFF RELATED TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF APPROXIMATELY 11 ACRES OF REAL PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED WEST OF THE INTERSECTION OF LAKE MARY ROAD AND HIGH COUNTRY TRAIL IN FLAGSTAFF, ARIZONA AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE
Moved by Councilmember Adam Shimoni, seconded by Councilmember Miranda Sweet to adopt Resolution No. 2021-12.
Vote: 4 - 3
- NAY:
-
Mayor Paul Deasy
Councilmember Austin Aslan
Councilmember Jim McCarthy
C.
Consideration and Adoption of Resolution No. 2021-36: A resolution approving an Intergovernmental Agreement with Coconino County for and on behalf of Coconino County Juvenile Court Services Department, Coconino County Accommodation School District, and the City of Flagstaff for the relocation of the Juvenile Court Transition School to the Hal Jensen Recreation Center.
Recreation Manager Jon Wilson and Heidi McGervey, a teacher at Ponderosa High School, provided a PowerPoint presentation that covered the following:
TRANSITION SCHOOL: GOALS, PURPOSE, AND HISTORY
HAL JENSEN RECREATION CENTER: CLASSROOM SPACE AND BENEFITS
QUESTIONS?
Council expressed their gratitude and thanks to everyone involved in bringing this forward.
TRANSITION SCHOOL: GOALS, PURPOSE, AND HISTORY
HAL JENSEN RECREATION CENTER: CLASSROOM SPACE AND BENEFITS
QUESTIONS?
Council expressed their gratitude and thanks to everyone involved in bringing this forward.
Moved by Councilmember Jim McCarthy, seconded by Mayor Paul Deasy to read Resolution No. 2021-36 by title only.
Vote: 7 - 0 - Unanimously
A RESOLUTION OF THE FLAGSTAFF CITY COUNCIL, APPROVING AN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN COCONINO COUNTY JUVENILE COURT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, COCONINO COUNTY ACCOMMODATION SCHOOL DISTRICT, AND THE CITY OF FLAGSTAFF FOR USE OF THE CITY’S HAL JENSEN RECREATION CENTER BY THE SCHOOL DISTRICT FOR ITS JUVENILE TRANSITION SCHOOL
Moved by Mayor Paul Deasy, seconded by Councilmember Jim McCarthy to adopt Resolution No. 2021-36.
Vote: 7 - 0 - Unanimously
D.
Consideration and Adoption of Resolution No. 2021-37: Approval for renewal of the Intergovernmental Agreement between the City of Flagstaff and the Blue Ridge Fire Department for dispatch services
Police Department Communications Manager Katie Brandis provided a summary of the history of the IGA.
Moved by Mayor Paul Deasy, seconded by Councilmember Adam Shimoni to read Resolution No. 2021-37 by title only.
Vote: 7 - 0 - Unanimously
A RESOLUTION OF THE FLAGSTAFF CITY COUNCIL, APPROVING AN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN BLUE RIDGE FIRE DISTRICT AND THE CITY OF FLAGSTAFF FOR DISPATCH SERVICES
Moved by Mayor Paul Deasy, seconded by Councilmember Miranda Sweet to adopt Resolution No. 2021-37.
Vote: 7 - 0 - Unanimously
E.
Consideration and Adoption of Resolution No. 2021-38: A resolution of the Flagstaff City Council, approving an Intergovernmental Agreement between the City of Williams, City of Page, Grand Canyon National Park, Glen Canyon National Park Service and the City of Flagstaff for the Arizona 911 Grant Program
Police Department Communications Manager Katie Brandis gave a summary of the history of the IGA.
Moved by Mayor Paul Deasy, seconded by Councilmember Jim McCarthy to read Resolution No. 2021-38 by title only.
Vote: 7 - 0 - Unanimously
A RESOLUTION OF THE FLAGSTAFF CITY COUNCIL, APPROVING AN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF WILLIAMS, CITY OF PAGE, GRAND CANYON NATIONAL PARK, GLEN CANYON NATIONAL PARK SERVICE AND THE CITY OF FLAGSTAFF FOR THE ARIZONA 911 GRANT PROGRAM.
Moved by Mayor Paul Deasy, seconded by Vice Mayor Becky Daggett to adopt Resolution No. 2021-38.
Vote: 7 - 0 - Unanimously
F.
Consideration and Adoption of Ordinance No. 2021-18: An Ordinance of the Flagstaff City Council authorizing the acquisition of real property interests for the Beulah/University Roadway Project; providing for delegation of authority, severability, and establishing an effective date
Real Estate Manager Bryce Doty provided a PowerPoint presentation that covered the following:
VICINITY MAP
CURRENT DESIGN OVERVIEW
UNIVERSITY DRIVE DESIGN
BEULAH DRIVE DESIGN
Vice Mayor Daggett inquired whether the primary property acquisition was for the pedestrian tunnel and if it involved the Burger King parking lot. Mr. Doty clarified that the acquisition is actually in the Target parking lot and confirmed there are no structures on the property, though it would impact parking.
Senior Deputy City Manager Anderson asked if there was a Target sign on the parcel. Mr. Doty responded that he believes it is just additional parking, with no signage.
Councilmember Shimoni asked how this acquisition affects the project discussed the previous week.
City Engineer Rick Barrett explained that changes to the project would require a change order, coordination with ADOT, and new funding before redesign implementation. However, as Mr. Doty noted, this is the first reading, and the property in question is not impacted by last week’s discussion.
Councilmember Shimoni reiterated that he is willing to delay if needed to ensure the project is done right.
Mayor Deasy agreed that a delay could be appropriate, but he is supportive of proceeding with the first read.
VICINITY MAP
CURRENT DESIGN OVERVIEW
UNIVERSITY DRIVE DESIGN
BEULAH DRIVE DESIGN
Vice Mayor Daggett inquired whether the primary property acquisition was for the pedestrian tunnel and if it involved the Burger King parking lot. Mr. Doty clarified that the acquisition is actually in the Target parking lot and confirmed there are no structures on the property, though it would impact parking.
Senior Deputy City Manager Anderson asked if there was a Target sign on the parcel. Mr. Doty responded that he believes it is just additional parking, with no signage.
Councilmember Shimoni asked how this acquisition affects the project discussed the previous week.
City Engineer Rick Barrett explained that changes to the project would require a change order, coordination with ADOT, and new funding before redesign implementation. However, as Mr. Doty noted, this is the first reading, and the property in question is not impacted by last week’s discussion.
Councilmember Shimoni reiterated that he is willing to delay if needed to ensure the project is done right.
Mayor Deasy agreed that a delay could be appropriate, but he is supportive of proceeding with the first read.
Moved by Mayor Paul Deasy, seconded by Councilmember Adam Shimoni to read Ordinance No. 2021-18 by title only for the first time.
Vote: 7 - 0 - Unanimously
AN ORDINANCE OF THE FLAGSTAFF CITY COUNCIL AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF REAL PROPERTY INTERESTS FOR THE BEULAH/UNIVERSITY ROADWAY PROJECT; PROVIDING FOR DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY, SEVERABILITY, AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE
G.
Consideration and Adoption of Resolution No. 2021-39: A resolution extending an Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) between the City of Flagstaff and the Lockett Ranch Fire District for fire and medical services.
Fire Department Deputy Chief Mark Wilson explained the need for the IGA’s extension until they can get a long-term contract.
Moved by Mayor Paul Deasy, seconded by Councilmember Miranda Sweet to read Resolution No. 2021-39 by title only.
Vote: 7 - 0 - Unanimously
A RESOLUTION OF THE FLAGSTAFF CITY COUNCIL, APPROVING AN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN LOCKETT RANCHES FIRE DISTRICT AND THE CITY OF FLAGSTAFF FOR AN EXTENSION OF THE EXISTING FIRE SERVICE AGREEMENT
Moved by Mayor Paul Deasy, seconded by Councilmember Jim McCarthy to adopt Resolution No. 2021-39.
Vote: 7 - 0 - Unanimously
A break was called from 6:05 p.m. through 6:15 p.m.
9.
DISCUSSION ITEMS
A.
Separated bike lanes pilot project
Separated bike lanes pilot project
Multi-Model Transportation Planner Martin Ince provided a PowerPoint presentation that covered the following:
OUTLINE
PETITION AND CANDIDATE STREETS
PILOT LOCATIONS
BARRIER OPTIONS
MAP
BEAVER ST.
BUTLER AVE.
BEAVER ST. DIAGRAM
BUTLER AVE. DIAGRAM
PILOT | WHAT WE CAN LEARN
BARRIER OPTIONS
CANDLESTICKS
METAL RAILING
CONCRETE BARRIER
ESTIMATED COST PER MILE
DURABILITY
INSTALLATION
John Dailey, Nick Jones, and Anthony Quintile addressed Council in support of the separated bike lanes
Councilmember Shimoni suggested completing the loop and then collecting data but agreed with staff’s recommendation to gather a baseline first. He asked about road widths in narrow areas, and Mr. Ince responded that Southside lanes are about 10 feet wide, with under 10 feet being the threshold for safety and operational concerns like snow removal. Councilmember Shimoni expressed trust in staff’s judgment, supported basing the pilot on reaching 60% of the population, and emphasized the importance of implementing the full route for cyclists.
Public Works Director Scott Overton discussed barrier maintenance, noting that candlesticks are not viable long-term, metal rails are costly, and concrete curbs present a more feasible option despite challenges with snow removal and sweeping. Specialized small equipment would be needed for upkeep.
Councilmember Shimoni stated that concrete barriers seem the obvious choice and noted the $2.6 million estimated cost to close the loop could potentially be covered in the budget. He expressed full support for the contract and moving forward with the pilot. He asked how street segments like Cedar and Fourth were selected, Mr. Ince said they were chosen to keep the project nimble. Councilmember Shimoni voiced support for future expansion.
Councilmember McCarthy thanked staff for the cross-section visuals and asked about the width of large vehicles like city buses. Mr. Bauman stated that the maximum legal vehicle width in Arizona is 8’6”. Councilmember McCarthy supported the Butler Avenue pilot, preferring it over Beaver due to higher traffic volume. He favored concrete barriers and candlesticks, opposed steel rails, and emphasized that bike lanes should be wide enough to allow passing.
Vice Mayor Daggett asked if both lanes on Butler could be 10.5 feet wide, which Mr. Ince said was possible but would require further discussion. She inquired about funding, and staff confirmed that $1 million from Props 419 and 420 is allocated for protected bike lanes. Vice Mayor Daggett supported narrowing lanes to reduce speeding and emphasized the need for visible infrastructure, especially in snow. She supported concrete and candlesticks, the contract, and expanding treatment areas without delaying progress.
Councilmember Sweet supported seeing both pilot options, favored concrete barriers, and was open to closing the loop. She also supported the contract.
Mayor Deasy voiced support for concrete, both pilots, more research on next steps, 10.5’ lane widths, and the contract.
Councilmember Aslan supported staff recommendations, wanted the project done sooner rather than later, supported the contract, concrete barriers with candlesticks, and emphasized that wide, protected bike lanes are long-term amenities. He also supported narrowing lanes to calm traffic.
Councilmember Shimoni asked what 10.5’ lane widths mean in terms of vehicle speed. Mr. Bauman replied that speed is affected by various factors like road curvature and nearby buildings, and while a change is expected, the exact effect is unknown.
Multi-Model Transportation Planner Martin Ince provided a PowerPoint presentation that covered the following:
OUTLINE
PETITION AND CANDIDATE STREETS
PILOT LOCATIONS
BARRIER OPTIONS
MAP
BEAVER ST.
BUTLER AVE.
BEAVER ST. DIAGRAM
BUTLER AVE. DIAGRAM
PILOT | WHAT WE CAN LEARN
BARRIER OPTIONS
CANDLESTICKS
METAL RAILING
CONCRETE BARRIER
ESTIMATED COST PER MILE
DURABILITY
INSTALLATION
John Dailey, Nick Jones, and Anthony Quintile addressed Council in support of the separated bike lanes
Councilmember Shimoni suggested completing the loop and then collecting data but agreed with staff’s recommendation to gather a baseline first. He asked about road widths in narrow areas, and Mr. Ince responded that Southside lanes are about 10 feet wide, with under 10 feet being the threshold for safety and operational concerns like snow removal. Councilmember Shimoni expressed trust in staff’s judgment, supported basing the pilot on reaching 60% of the population, and emphasized the importance of implementing the full route for cyclists.
Public Works Director Scott Overton discussed barrier maintenance, noting that candlesticks are not viable long-term, metal rails are costly, and concrete curbs present a more feasible option despite challenges with snow removal and sweeping. Specialized small equipment would be needed for upkeep.
Councilmember Shimoni stated that concrete barriers seem the obvious choice and noted the $2.6 million estimated cost to close the loop could potentially be covered in the budget. He expressed full support for the contract and moving forward with the pilot. He asked how street segments like Cedar and Fourth were selected, Mr. Ince said they were chosen to keep the project nimble. Councilmember Shimoni voiced support for future expansion.
Councilmember McCarthy thanked staff for the cross-section visuals and asked about the width of large vehicles like city buses. Mr. Bauman stated that the maximum legal vehicle width in Arizona is 8’6”. Councilmember McCarthy supported the Butler Avenue pilot, preferring it over Beaver due to higher traffic volume. He favored concrete barriers and candlesticks, opposed steel rails, and emphasized that bike lanes should be wide enough to allow passing.
Vice Mayor Daggett asked if both lanes on Butler could be 10.5 feet wide, which Mr. Ince said was possible but would require further discussion. She inquired about funding, and staff confirmed that $1 million from Props 419 and 420 is allocated for protected bike lanes. Vice Mayor Daggett supported narrowing lanes to reduce speeding and emphasized the need for visible infrastructure, especially in snow. She supported concrete and candlesticks, the contract, and expanding treatment areas without delaying progress.
Councilmember Sweet supported seeing both pilot options, favored concrete barriers, and was open to closing the loop. She also supported the contract.
Mayor Deasy voiced support for concrete, both pilots, more research on next steps, 10.5’ lane widths, and the contract.
Councilmember Aslan supported staff recommendations, wanted the project done sooner rather than later, supported the contract, concrete barriers with candlesticks, and emphasized that wide, protected bike lanes are long-term amenities. He also supported narrowing lanes to calm traffic.
Councilmember Shimoni asked what 10.5’ lane widths mean in terms of vehicle speed. Mr. Bauman replied that speed is affected by various factors like road curvature and nearby buildings, and while a change is expected, the exact effect is unknown.
10.
COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS
Councilmember McCarthy attended the recent Bicycle Advisory Committee meeting. He stated his appreciation for staff and was able to assist with Council perspective at the meeting.
Councilmember Shimoni stated that the attended a recent meeting regarding the Rio de Flag project and discussed different alternatives staff have presented.
Councilmember Shimoni stated that the attended a recent meeting regarding the Rio de Flag project and discussed different alternatives staff have presented.
11.
FUTURE AGENDA ITEM REQUESTS
After discussion and upon agreement by three members of the Council, an item will be moved to a regularly-scheduled Council meeting.
After discussion and upon agreement by three members of the Council, an item will be moved to a regularly-scheduled Council meeting.
A.
Future Agenda Item Request (F.A.I.R.): A request by Councilmember Shimoni to place on a future agenda a discussion about unsheltered and vulnerable populations with the closure of the forests and the anti-camping ordinance.
Councilmember Shimoni explained his request, citing the recurring forest closures and their wide-reaching impacts. He emphasized the need for a long-term plan. Mr. Clifton noted that a plan already exists and will be shared with Council.
Mayor Deasy supported moving the item forward.
Councilmember Aslan welcomed discussion on supporting unsheltered populations but opposed the item as written, stating he does not support lifting the anti-camping ordinance, which he sees as necessary for public safety.
Councilmember McCarthy agreed with Councilmember Aslan, supporting discussion on assistance but not on reversing the anti-camping ordinance.
Councilmember Shimoni clarified his intent for the FAIR to allow broad discussion, including but not limited to the ordinance.
City Attorney Solomon confirmed that with Councilmember Shimoni’s clarification, the item would include discussion of the anti-camping ordinance; otherwise, a separate item would be needed to focus only on fire-related responses.
There was not requisite support to advance the item to a future agenda.
Mayor Deasy supported moving the item forward.
Councilmember Aslan welcomed discussion on supporting unsheltered populations but opposed the item as written, stating he does not support lifting the anti-camping ordinance, which he sees as necessary for public safety.
Councilmember McCarthy agreed with Councilmember Aslan, supporting discussion on assistance but not on reversing the anti-camping ordinance.
Councilmember Shimoni clarified his intent for the FAIR to allow broad discussion, including but not limited to the ordinance.
City Attorney Solomon confirmed that with Councilmember Shimoni’s clarification, the item would include discussion of the anti-camping ordinance; otherwise, a separate item would be needed to focus only on fire-related responses.
There was not requisite support to advance the item to a future agenda.
12.
CITY MANAGER REPORT
A.
City Manager Report
City Manager Clifton briefly reviewed his report and mentioned that monthly updates from Economic Vitality, Sustainability, and Water Services divisions, as well as the second quarterly Boards and Commissions Newsletter, were included.
Councilmember Shimoni gave a shout out to Raymond Gonzales, suggesting a photo timeline of his service, and recognized Officer Brad Gilbert for his work.
Councilmember Shimoni gave a shout out to Raymond Gonzales, suggesting a photo timeline of his service, and recognized Officer Brad Gilbert for his work.
i.
Discussion of ARPA Funding
Mr. Clifton brought attention to the ARPA Funding. Management Services Director Rick Tadder spoke about the memo attached to the manager’s report and asked Council to allow staff to send letter that is related to calculations of revenue fund level. He spoke of some of the difficulties that the city might have with the ARPA.
Council provided direction to move forward.
Council provided direction to move forward.
13.
INFORMATIONAL ITEMS AND REPORTS FROM COUNCIL AND STAFF, FUTURE AGENDA ITEM REQUESTS
Councilmember Shimoni stated that he would like to request a FAIR for a discussion about unsheltered and vulnerable populations with the closure of the forests
Vice Mayor Daggett stated that she recently presented a proclamation for 100 years of service to the Rotary Club. She also stated that the forest is open, however we are in stage two restrictions and in a drought.
Vice Mayor Daggett stated that she recently presented a proclamation for 100 years of service to the Rotary Club. She also stated that the forest is open, however we are in stage two restrictions and in a drought.
14.
ADJOURNMENT
The Regular Meeting of the Flagstaff City Council held July 6, 2021, adjourned at 8:04 p.m.
_____________________________________ MAYOR |
|
| ATTEST: |
|
_____________________________________ CITY CLERK |
CERTIFICATION
I, STACY SALTZBURG, do hereby certify that I am the City Clerk of the City of Flagstaff, County of Coconino, State of Arizona, and that the above Minutes are a true and correct summary of the Meeting of the Council of the City of Flagstaff held on July 6, 2021. I further certify that the Meeting was duly called and held and that a quorum was present.
| DATED this 16th day of December, 2025 | |
________________________________________ CITY CLERK |