23-54

429 N 20th St Unit B

Johnson, Sharon

Shaun Coss

Case Initiated:

January 10, 2023

Type of Presentation:

Lien Reduction

OWNER:  Sharon Johnson  4268 Lake Tahoe Cir  West Palm Beach FL 33409

OCCUPIED BY:

FBC105.1 (2020) Permit Required, IPMC 111.1.1 (2021) Unsafe Structures, IPMC 111.1.2 (2021) Unsafe Equipment, IPMC 111.1.3 (2021) Structure Unfit for Human Occupancy, IPMC 111.1.5 (2021) Dangerous Structure or Premises, IPMC 304.1 (2021) Exterior Structure – General, IPMC 304.1.1 (2021) Unsafe Conditions, IPMC 304.2 (2021) Protective Treatment, IPMC 304.3 (2021) Address Identification, IPMC 304.4 (2021) Structural Members, IPMC 304.6 (2021) Exterior Walls, IPMC 304.7 (2021) Roofs and Drainage, IPMC 304.13 (2021) Windows, Skylight and Door Frames, IPMC 304.13.1 (2021) Glazing, IPMC 304.15 (2021) Doors, IPMC 304.18 (2021) Building Security, IPMC 304.18.1 (2021) Doors, IPMC 305.1 General, IPMC 305.1.1 (2021) Unsafe Conditions, IPMC 305.2 (2021) Structural Members, IPMC 305.3 (2021) Interior Surfaces, IPMC 305.4 (2021) Stairs and Walking Surfaces, IPMC 306.1 (2021) Component Serviceability – General, IPMC 306.1.1 (2021) Unsafe Conditions, IPMC 604.3 (2021) Electrical System Hazards, IPMC 604.3.1 (2021) Abatement of Electrical Hazards Associated with Water Exposure, IPMC 604.3.1.1 (2021) Electrical Equipment, IPMC 604.3.2.1 (2021) Electrical Equipment

Order Determining Violation - April 19, 2023
Notice of Extension of Time 90 days - December 19, 2023
Affidavit of Non-Compliance - March 27, 2024
Order Approving Respondent's Request for Extension of Time - 60 days - June 14, 2024
Order Denying Respondent's Request for Extension of Time - November 12, 2024
Order Assessing Fine and Imposing Lien - January 9, 2025
Affidavit of Compliance - August 12, 2025

1. Whether the requesting party is the person responsible for the original violation that resulted in the Lien?
   • Yes
2. Whether the requesting party has established the existence of extenuating circumstances that prevented timely compliance and/or any extenuating circumstances that support the reduction below the minimum administrative review amounts provided in Special Magistrate Rule 5.4(B)(1)?
   • To be determined by the Special Magistrate.
3. Whether there is a current code enforcement action on this property or any other property under common ownership?
   • Four cases that are before the Special Magistrate today.
4. The type and number of Lien reductions granted for this property or any other property under common ownership in the past 24 months?
   • None on record.
5. Whether granting of the reduction is in the best interest of the City?
   • To be determined by the Special Magistrate

Reduce the lien to the administrative costs incurred by the City of Fort Pierce.