SPECIAL MEETING - January 5, 2016
BE IT REMEMBERED, that on this 5th day of January A.D., 2016, there was begun and held a SPECIAL MEETING of the Honorable Commissioners’ Court of Hidalgo County, Texas, wherein the following members thereof were present, to-wit:
| HONORABLE RAMON GARCIA HONORABLE A.C. CUELLAR, JR. HONORABLE EDUARDO "EDDIE" CANTU HONORABLE JOE M. FLORES HONORABLE JOSEPH PALACIOS |
HIDALGO COUNTY JUDGE COMMISSIONER, PRECINCT NO. 1 COMMISSIONER, PRECINCT NO. 2 COMMISSIONER, PRECINCT NO. 3 COMMISSIONER, PRECINCT NO. 4 |
and ARTURO GUAJARDO, JR., COUNTY CLERK & EX-OFFICIO CLERK OF THE COMMISSIONERS’ COURT of Hidalgo County, Texas, wherein the following proceedings were had, to-wit:
![]() |
AGENDA CC REGULAR HIDALGO COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COURT MEETING January 5, 2016 9:30 A.M. |
|
NOTICE is hereby given in accordance with Chapter 551, Texas Government Code, that a SPECIAL MEETING of the Commissioners' Court will be held at the Edinburg Council Chambers 415 W. University Drive, Edinburg, Hidalgo County, Texas. Discussion and possible action relating to the following business will be transacted:
1.
Roll Call
All members of the Court were in attendance.
All members of the Court were in attendance.
2.
Pledge of Allegiance
Judge Garcia led the courtroom in reciting the Pledge of Allegiance.
Judge Garcia led the courtroom in reciting the Pledge of Allegiance.
3.
Prayer
Virginia Townsend led the courtroom in Prayer.
Judge Garcia requested a moment of silence in memory and honor of Staff Sgt. Michael Anthony Cinco.Sergeant Cinco was a native of the Rio Grande Valley, he was killed in Afghanistan during a suicide bombing.
The court also offered a moment of silence in memory of former State Rep. Antonio “Tony” Garcia. The Mercedes native served in World War II, served as City Commissioner and Municipal Judge for the City of Pharr.
A moment of silence was also offered in memory of former Hidalgo County Auditor, Mr. Manuel Cavazos. He served as county auditor for 4 years under Judge Joe Evans.
Commissioners Cantu and Palacios stepped away from the meeting.
Court proceeded to Item.6.C.
Virginia Townsend led the courtroom in Prayer.
Judge Garcia requested a moment of silence in memory and honor of Staff Sgt. Michael Anthony Cinco.Sergeant Cinco was a native of the Rio Grande Valley, he was killed in Afghanistan during a suicide bombing.
The court also offered a moment of silence in memory of former State Rep. Antonio “Tony” Garcia. The Mercedes native served in World War II, served as City Commissioner and Municipal Judge for the City of Pharr.
A moment of silence was also offered in memory of former Hidalgo County Auditor, Mr. Manuel Cavazos. He served as county auditor for 4 years under Judge Joe Evans.
Commissioners Cantu and Palacios stepped away from the meeting.
Court proceeded to Item.6.C.
4.
Approval of Consent Agenda
The court moved to approve the Consent Agenda for the exception of Item.8.B to be pulled for discussion.
The court moved to approve the Consent Agenda for the exception of Item.8.B to be pulled for discussion.
5.
Open Forum
Commissioner Cuellar stepped away from the meeting.
Rosie Tijerina spoke in relation to the public lighting in the colonias, she mentioned that they have collected 75% of signatures and have turned the signatures to the precinct. She clarified to Commissioner Palacios that this was in reference to the Gulineros subdivision.
Commissioner Cuellar joined the meeting.
Martha Sanchez, with LUPE organization acknowledged all the work done by the commissioners last year and hopes to move forward with the public lighting in the colonias. They are hopeful to see action by the end of January and not any further than that. She added that aside from all the talking about budget and salary increases, people in the colonias want to actually see services and not just well paid county employees. Mrs. Sanchez also suggested to the members to allocate some money for the infrastructure of the subdivisions.
John Dimas addressed Commissioner Palacios requesting to please not forget the people from the Rio Grande Road. Mr. Dimas commented to the commissioner that his staff had assured to him that something was going to be done by the end of 2015, yet they are still waiting.
Opal Billman reminded the court that she was sued for divorce in May of 1996 requiring a legal division of community property. At that time, she requested to have a survey of the property but the judge determined it was access land with no value. Mrs. Billman and her husband invested in land, they farmed citrus, grains, cotton and tomatoes. They dredge a lake and now it has been brought to her attention that this lake could be of used by the Drainage District, Irrigation District, City of Mission and Halliburton. Action of the court was to bring into existence two new state certified corporations and award them with the land, instead of awarding it back to them. Mrs. Billman claims that they neither received nor sold any community property. Adding that the judge did nothing and therefore the land stayed the same as when it entered court. Furthermore, she claims that the City of Mission bought a strip of her land for $280,000 dollars of tax payer’s money and questioned where the money went to. Mrs. Billman also claims that the North 20 acres of John H. Shary have been owned by the Billman family since 1942. The frontage has never been commercial land, but now a commercial business has been built on her land. She also claimed that individuals have trespassed into lot 194 of Shary Rd. When she approached them she was told that they could do what they wanted to. Mrs. Billman stated that even after 20 years she still keeps asking for an examination and fair compliance to the law.
Judge Garcia stepped away from the meeting.
Vanessa Tijerina announced that she requested the appropriate time base on her disability rights. Ms. Tijerina wished the members a happy new year and acknowledged all the good things they have done for Hidalgo County. She stated that she tried communicating with one of the commissioners to address her concern however, the call was not answered. Ms. Tijerina validated her concern not only as valley wide but county wide. She stated that she was able to get the FBI to investigate her municipality despite the fact that she is an unconnected citizen. She announced that she is a nurse trained to identify problems. Also, a scientist and a biologist she claimed to be trained to identify and analyze data to make the world a better place. As a humanist she acts, and as presume next congress woman of congressional district No.50 she came to advocate for the people. She finally opened up to the main issue of her presence, that being the potholes. She claimed that these potholes affect the quality of life for people that are already at risk.
Judge Garcia joined the meeting.
Dr. Adams circulated a petition to request repairs at the Old La Blanca Road. She claimed that the potholes are not being cared for appropriately.
Andrea Landeros with ARISE Organization, came to thanked Commissioners Cantu and Cuellar in reference to their attendance at the meeting held in regards to the Donna Lake. She also invited the commissioners to the next meeting schedule for January 14, 2016.
Eduardo Estrada a citizen from precinct 4 spoke about the issues regarding the potholes and requested to know when Trento Road, Canton, Cesar Chavez and other roads will be finally fix. He asked the court to consider allocating money for the improvements of these roads.
Commissioner Palacios addressed the issues in reference to the roads. He stated that they are yet to receive any money from FEMA. The first amount they had proposed was too low and unacceptable. At the moment they are reevaluating the roads and now it seems to be there will be a better estimate to fix the road damages.
Belinda Alvarez updated the court about the recovery process for the disaster recovery phase 4245 that being the October rain event. Under the disaster recovery phase 4223 which affected the valley during the May to June months, she mentioned they requested FEMA to reassess precinct s 4 and 1. For the October rain event, FEMA amended a declaration to provide public assistance to Hidalgo County.
Court proceeded to Item. 6.B
Commissioner Cuellar stepped away from the meeting.
Rosie Tijerina spoke in relation to the public lighting in the colonias, she mentioned that they have collected 75% of signatures and have turned the signatures to the precinct. She clarified to Commissioner Palacios that this was in reference to the Gulineros subdivision.
Commissioner Cuellar joined the meeting.
Martha Sanchez, with LUPE organization acknowledged all the work done by the commissioners last year and hopes to move forward with the public lighting in the colonias. They are hopeful to see action by the end of January and not any further than that. She added that aside from all the talking about budget and salary increases, people in the colonias want to actually see services and not just well paid county employees. Mrs. Sanchez also suggested to the members to allocate some money for the infrastructure of the subdivisions.
John Dimas addressed Commissioner Palacios requesting to please not forget the people from the Rio Grande Road. Mr. Dimas commented to the commissioner that his staff had assured to him that something was going to be done by the end of 2015, yet they are still waiting.
Opal Billman reminded the court that she was sued for divorce in May of 1996 requiring a legal division of community property. At that time, she requested to have a survey of the property but the judge determined it was access land with no value. Mrs. Billman and her husband invested in land, they farmed citrus, grains, cotton and tomatoes. They dredge a lake and now it has been brought to her attention that this lake could be of used by the Drainage District, Irrigation District, City of Mission and Halliburton. Action of the court was to bring into existence two new state certified corporations and award them with the land, instead of awarding it back to them. Mrs. Billman claims that they neither received nor sold any community property. Adding that the judge did nothing and therefore the land stayed the same as when it entered court. Furthermore, she claims that the City of Mission bought a strip of her land for $280,000 dollars of tax payer’s money and questioned where the money went to. Mrs. Billman also claims that the North 20 acres of John H. Shary have been owned by the Billman family since 1942. The frontage has never been commercial land, but now a commercial business has been built on her land. She also claimed that individuals have trespassed into lot 194 of Shary Rd. When she approached them she was told that they could do what they wanted to. Mrs. Billman stated that even after 20 years she still keeps asking for an examination and fair compliance to the law.
Judge Garcia stepped away from the meeting.
Vanessa Tijerina announced that she requested the appropriate time base on her disability rights. Ms. Tijerina wished the members a happy new year and acknowledged all the good things they have done for Hidalgo County. She stated that she tried communicating with one of the commissioners to address her concern however, the call was not answered. Ms. Tijerina validated her concern not only as valley wide but county wide. She stated that she was able to get the FBI to investigate her municipality despite the fact that she is an unconnected citizen. She announced that she is a nurse trained to identify problems. Also, a scientist and a biologist she claimed to be trained to identify and analyze data to make the world a better place. As a humanist she acts, and as presume next congress woman of congressional district No.50 she came to advocate for the people. She finally opened up to the main issue of her presence, that being the potholes. She claimed that these potholes affect the quality of life for people that are already at risk.
Judge Garcia joined the meeting.
Dr. Adams circulated a petition to request repairs at the Old La Blanca Road. She claimed that the potholes are not being cared for appropriately.
Andrea Landeros with ARISE Organization, came to thanked Commissioners Cantu and Cuellar in reference to their attendance at the meeting held in regards to the Donna Lake. She also invited the commissioners to the next meeting schedule for January 14, 2016.
Eduardo Estrada a citizen from precinct 4 spoke about the issues regarding the potholes and requested to know when Trento Road, Canton, Cesar Chavez and other roads will be finally fix. He asked the court to consider allocating money for the improvements of these roads.
Commissioner Palacios addressed the issues in reference to the roads. He stated that they are yet to receive any money from FEMA. The first amount they had proposed was too low and unacceptable. At the moment they are reevaluating the roads and now it seems to be there will be a better estimate to fix the road damages.
Belinda Alvarez updated the court about the recovery process for the disaster recovery phase 4245 that being the October rain event. Under the disaster recovery phase 4223 which affected the valley during the May to June months, she mentioned they requested FEMA to reassess precinct s 4 and 1. For the October rain event, FEMA amended a declaration to provide public assistance to Hidalgo County.
Court proceeded to Item. 6.B
Attachments:
6.
County Judge's Office:
A.
AI-52816
Resolution in Honor of Ms. Norma Longoria.
Commissioner Cantu joined the meeting.
Ms. Longoria received recognition for all her 37 years of dedication to the Hidalgo County WIC program.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 2, EDUARDO “EDDIE” CANTU, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
Court proceeded to Item.6.C.2
Commissioner Cantu joined the meeting.
Ms. Longoria received recognition for all her 37 years of dedication to the Hidalgo County WIC program.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 2, EDUARDO “EDDIE” CANTU, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
Court proceeded to Item.6.C.2
Attachments:
B.
AI-52811
1. Discussion, consideration and action to rescind approval of agenda item 21.A.2, approved on December 15, 2015.
Judge Garcia refreshed Mr. Eufracio about his petition to authorize increases for his office back on December 15, 2015. The judge mentioned they were presented with an order by the district judge authorizing some salary increases for the auditor’s office. At that moment they did not have the appropriate figures however, they realize and understand what the law is and that whatever the district judges appropriate they themselves are require to accept; unless it exceeds the sum of 5% of salary increase.
This morning they realized that about 90% of employees receiving increases are exceeding the 5% salary increase. Therefore, he is now bring attention to this matter to direct the members of the court to the effect of the action that was taken, and whether or not they still want to abide by the action taken on December 15, 2015.
Judge Garcia underlined that the order read to have these salaries take effect at the beginning of January 2016. Notwithstanding, they as a court partly acted based on his advice to postpone other salaries until later in the year. Judge Garcia brought to Mr. Eufracio’s attention that it was him who alarmed the court saying that the county was only one good storm away from going under the set 10%. Therefore, based on his recommendation they postpone salary increases until July 2016 with the stipulation to revisit the date for either late March or April.
Mr. Eufracio clarified to Judge Garcia that his recommendation was not for any specific date but instead he was trying to keep the county away from digging themselves into a deeper hole.
Regardless of this comment, Judge commented that either way they deferred increases until a later date because of his guidance. However the matter, he was able to get 90% of his employees an increase of over 5% to be in effect at the beginning of January 2016. All things consider, Judge Garcia expressed the unfairness that occurred because other employees will have to wait until further into the year. Base on this action Judge Garcia expressed to Mr. Eufracio that his employees shouldn’t be treated any different than the rest.
Mr. Eufracio manifested that bottom line, judge was the one that acted on the order and the law specifies the process by which the auditor’s office receives the amount. Judge Garcia argued that the numbers were not there, onto what Mr. Eufracio replied that the numbers and the information was there and that perhaps they just did not look closely. Judge Garcia acknowledged the fact that they have to act on the direction of the district court order. However, they have the right to rescind the order. Judge mentioned that some of those percentages range anywhere between 8.4%, 12.2%, 6.4% allowing those 90% of employees to receive over 6%. Considerably, Judge Garcia announced that he wouldn’t have approved this order, instead he would have approved an order modifying not to exceed the 5% that the law mandates to do.
In reference to the judge’s comment, Mr. Eufracio expressed that there was nothing he could do to modify the order. The only thing that he could possibly do is not approve the salary over the 5%. However the situation Mr. Eufracio reminded Judge Garcia that he approved and accepted the order and that after the beginning of the year he cannot go back and modify the salaries with the auditor’s office, because of the authority given by law through the district judges.
Judge Garcia mentioned to him that he agrees with him at the 5% level but not any higher than that.
Commissioner Cantu commented on the issue by expressing to Mr. Eufracio that he is usually the one person that comes and advices the members to be cautious about money, but yet he sneaked an order without numbers. He also reminded Mr. Eufracio how it was him who advised the court to hold off from approving the salary changes until further into the year. Yet he was able to offer his employees a higher percentage than the 3% COLA that every other employee will be obtaining. Mr. Eufracio restated to the commissioner that he did provide the same numbers they have at the moment. Commissioner Cantu stated that they only received the old numbers and not the new numbers for the year, leaving them to make their own assumptions. Mr. Eufracio told Commissioner Cantu to consider the amount differences between the $26,000 for his office and the $1,372,830 for the rest of the increases. Commissioner Cantu emphasized to him that the amount differences did not matter, what matter was the fact that if he expects to hold everyone else to the same standards then he should follow them as well.
Additionally, Commissioner Palacios publicized his solidarity with the Sheriff’s Office manifesting that it's not fair to do for one department and not for the other. He also recognized those officials who rejected the COLA and manifested that he wished others would have follow.
In regards to fairness, Mr. Eufracio reminded the court that the Judge’s Office has granted over $22,000 of salary increase to one individual, when all together he is providing his department with $26,000 for those increases.
Commissioners Cantu and Palacios stated that the point of this whole argument is the way things were done and how late in the year he brought the order to be signed.
Mrs. Townsend attested to all the times they have taken Mr. Eufracio’s side, however this time around she feels that his approach to the salaries was unfair to the rest of the employees. She suggested to him, to allow the commissioners to reconsider a more workable percentage.
Commissioner Cantu added to the sentiment by commenting that he doubts the decision taken by the board of judges was clear to them, being that they also have employees that would have to wait to get the increases and the 3% COLA. As far as ratifying the amount, the commissioner suggested leaving it as it is.
Judge Garcia indicated to Commissioner Flores that according to the statute they cannot modified under the 5%. Steve Crain specified to the court that the statute is clear in regards to modifications. However the difficulties arise because they are now in a different year and usually in different term of court you can’t go back and revise something that took action the previous year. For that matter, Mr. Crain expressed his concerns to take any action in a new year.
Judge Garcia made clear to Mr. Eufracio that this issues was not a matter of retaliation towards his persona, the matter was the fact in which the order was submitted to the board.
Commissioner Cantu asked Mr. Eufracio if he felt it was fair to have his employees receive the COLA in January, while the rest of the county employees have to wait until later in the year. Mr. Eufracio responded by claiming that his employees deserve these increases, and that based on how the statute is set up he is only able to revised salaries once a year.
Sergio Cruz mentioned that everyone receiving the COLA will be those above the 3% that have been deferred until July or late March.
No action taken on this item.
2. Approval and acceptance of Order dated October 29, 2015 setting salary of County Auditor, Assistant Auditors, and Budget of the County Auditor for 2016.
No action taken on this item.
3. Approval to revise the Salary Schedule in accordance with Commissioners Court Action.
No action taken on this item.
Court proceeded to Item.6.D.
Judge Garcia refreshed Mr. Eufracio about his petition to authorize increases for his office back on December 15, 2015. The judge mentioned they were presented with an order by the district judge authorizing some salary increases for the auditor’s office. At that moment they did not have the appropriate figures however, they realize and understand what the law is and that whatever the district judges appropriate they themselves are require to accept; unless it exceeds the sum of 5% of salary increase.
This morning they realized that about 90% of employees receiving increases are exceeding the 5% salary increase. Therefore, he is now bring attention to this matter to direct the members of the court to the effect of the action that was taken, and whether or not they still want to abide by the action taken on December 15, 2015.
Judge Garcia underlined that the order read to have these salaries take effect at the beginning of January 2016. Notwithstanding, they as a court partly acted based on his advice to postpone other salaries until later in the year. Judge Garcia brought to Mr. Eufracio’s attention that it was him who alarmed the court saying that the county was only one good storm away from going under the set 10%. Therefore, based on his recommendation they postpone salary increases until July 2016 with the stipulation to revisit the date for either late March or April.
Mr. Eufracio clarified to Judge Garcia that his recommendation was not for any specific date but instead he was trying to keep the county away from digging themselves into a deeper hole.
Regardless of this comment, Judge commented that either way they deferred increases until a later date because of his guidance. However the matter, he was able to get 90% of his employees an increase of over 5% to be in effect at the beginning of January 2016. All things consider, Judge Garcia expressed the unfairness that occurred because other employees will have to wait until further into the year. Base on this action Judge Garcia expressed to Mr. Eufracio that his employees shouldn’t be treated any different than the rest.
Mr. Eufracio manifested that bottom line, judge was the one that acted on the order and the law specifies the process by which the auditor’s office receives the amount. Judge Garcia argued that the numbers were not there, onto what Mr. Eufracio replied that the numbers and the information was there and that perhaps they just did not look closely. Judge Garcia acknowledged the fact that they have to act on the direction of the district court order. However, they have the right to rescind the order. Judge mentioned that some of those percentages range anywhere between 8.4%, 12.2%, 6.4% allowing those 90% of employees to receive over 6%. Considerably, Judge Garcia announced that he wouldn’t have approved this order, instead he would have approved an order modifying not to exceed the 5% that the law mandates to do.
In reference to the judge’s comment, Mr. Eufracio expressed that there was nothing he could do to modify the order. The only thing that he could possibly do is not approve the salary over the 5%. However the situation Mr. Eufracio reminded Judge Garcia that he approved and accepted the order and that after the beginning of the year he cannot go back and modify the salaries with the auditor’s office, because of the authority given by law through the district judges.
Judge Garcia mentioned to him that he agrees with him at the 5% level but not any higher than that.
Commissioner Cantu commented on the issue by expressing to Mr. Eufracio that he is usually the one person that comes and advices the members to be cautious about money, but yet he sneaked an order without numbers. He also reminded Mr. Eufracio how it was him who advised the court to hold off from approving the salary changes until further into the year. Yet he was able to offer his employees a higher percentage than the 3% COLA that every other employee will be obtaining. Mr. Eufracio restated to the commissioner that he did provide the same numbers they have at the moment. Commissioner Cantu stated that they only received the old numbers and not the new numbers for the year, leaving them to make their own assumptions. Mr. Eufracio told Commissioner Cantu to consider the amount differences between the $26,000 for his office and the $1,372,830 for the rest of the increases. Commissioner Cantu emphasized to him that the amount differences did not matter, what matter was the fact that if he expects to hold everyone else to the same standards then he should follow them as well.
Additionally, Commissioner Palacios publicized his solidarity with the Sheriff’s Office manifesting that it's not fair to do for one department and not for the other. He also recognized those officials who rejected the COLA and manifested that he wished others would have follow.
In regards to fairness, Mr. Eufracio reminded the court that the Judge’s Office has granted over $22,000 of salary increase to one individual, when all together he is providing his department with $26,000 for those increases.
Commissioners Cantu and Palacios stated that the point of this whole argument is the way things were done and how late in the year he brought the order to be signed.
Mrs. Townsend attested to all the times they have taken Mr. Eufracio’s side, however this time around she feels that his approach to the salaries was unfair to the rest of the employees. She suggested to him, to allow the commissioners to reconsider a more workable percentage.
Commissioner Cantu added to the sentiment by commenting that he doubts the decision taken by the board of judges was clear to them, being that they also have employees that would have to wait to get the increases and the 3% COLA. As far as ratifying the amount, the commissioner suggested leaving it as it is.
Judge Garcia indicated to Commissioner Flores that according to the statute they cannot modified under the 5%. Steve Crain specified to the court that the statute is clear in regards to modifications. However the difficulties arise because they are now in a different year and usually in different term of court you can’t go back and revise something that took action the previous year. For that matter, Mr. Crain expressed his concerns to take any action in a new year.
Judge Garcia made clear to Mr. Eufracio that this issues was not a matter of retaliation towards his persona, the matter was the fact in which the order was submitted to the board.
Commissioner Cantu asked Mr. Eufracio if he felt it was fair to have his employees receive the COLA in January, while the rest of the county employees have to wait until later in the year. Mr. Eufracio responded by claiming that his employees deserve these increases, and that based on how the statute is set up he is only able to revised salaries once a year.
Sergio Cruz mentioned that everyone receiving the COLA will be those above the 3% that have been deferred until July or late March.
No action taken on this item.
2. Approval and acceptance of Order dated October 29, 2015 setting salary of County Auditor, Assistant Auditors, and Budget of the County Auditor for 2016.
No action taken on this item.
3. Approval to revise the Salary Schedule in accordance with Commissioners Court Action.
No action taken on this item.
Court proceeded to Item.6.D.
Attachments:
C.
AI-52720
1. Approval of the appointment of interns from the Business, Education and Technology Academy (BETA) in Edinburg.
Ms. Nashla Showery and Dr. Nora Cazares thanked the county for allowing their students to continue participating in the internships within various county departments.
Commissioner Palacios joined the meeting.
Israel Peña will be placed in the Purchasing Department.
Jevon Harding will be placed in the Environmental Division.
Edgar Centeno will be assigned to the County Clerk's Office.
Sam Campbell will be situated in the Probate Court with Judge Homero Garza.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 4 - 0 - Unanimously
Court proceeded to Item.6.A
2. Authorization for County Judge Ramon Garcia to sign the Affiliation Agreement for the STISD/BETA High School Business Internship Program.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
Court proceeded to Item.21.A
Ms. Nashla Showery and Dr. Nora Cazares thanked the county for allowing their students to continue participating in the internships within various county departments.
Commissioner Palacios joined the meeting.
Israel Peña will be placed in the Purchasing Department.
Jevon Harding will be placed in the Environmental Division.
Edgar Centeno will be assigned to the County Clerk's Office.
Sam Campbell will be situated in the Probate Court with Judge Homero Garza.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 4 - 0 - Unanimously
Court proceeded to Item.6.A
2. Authorization for County Judge Ramon Garcia to sign the Affiliation Agreement for the STISD/BETA High School Business Internship Program.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
Court proceeded to Item.21.A
Attachments:
D.
AI-52800
Discussion and approval of amendment to Guidelines and Criteria for Granting Tax Abatements in Hidalgo County, Texas under Chapter 312 of the Texas Tax Code and approve order on same.
Commissioner Cuellar stepped away from the meeting.
Michael Leo, County Judge’s Office commented that they are bringing this item back because they must enter guidelines to enter into the agreement. Under the Wind Farm Project, the county was able to negotiate terms that are less than what the company would have been entitle under the guidelines.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 4 - 0 – Unanimously
Commissioner Cuellar stepped away from the meeting.
Michael Leo, County Judge’s Office commented that they are bringing this item back because they must enter guidelines to enter into the agreement. Under the Wind Farm Project, the county was able to negotiate terms that are less than what the company would have been entitle under the guidelines.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 4 - 0 – Unanimously
Attachments:
E.
AI-52821
1. Requesting approval to rescind action taken on 12/15/2015 on Amendment to Tax Abatement agreement between Hidalgo County and Hidalgo Wind Farm LLC, Phase I and Tax Abatement Agreement between Hidalgo County and Hidalgo Wind Farm LLC, Phase II and approve order on same.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 4 - 0 - Unanimously
Commissioner Cuellar joined the meeting.
2. Discussion and approval of Tax Abatement Agreement between Hidalgo County and Hidalgo Wind Farm (Phase II) and approve order on same.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
3. Discussion and approval on Amendment to Tax Abatement Agreement effective 12/22/2014 between Hidalgo County and Hidalgo Wind Farm LLC (Phase I) and approve order on same.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 4 - 0 - Unanimously
Commissioner Cuellar joined the meeting.
2. Discussion and approval of Tax Abatement Agreement between Hidalgo County and Hidalgo Wind Farm (Phase II) and approve order on same.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
3. Discussion and approval on Amendment to Tax Abatement Agreement effective 12/22/2014 between Hidalgo County and Hidalgo Wind Farm LLC (Phase I) and approve order on same.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
Attachments:
F.
AI-52823
Discussion and approval of Interlocal Agreement between City of McAllen, Hidalgo County, and the McAllen Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone Number Two and approve order on same.
No action taken on this item.
No action taken on this item.
Attachments:
7.
District Attorney's Office:
A.
AI-52699
District Attorney - USDJ (1256)
Approval of 2016 appropriation of funds in the amount of $20,500.00 to fund operating expenditures.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 2, EDUARDO “EDDIE” CANTU the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
Approval of 2016 appropriation of funds in the amount of $20,500.00 to fund operating expenditures.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 2, EDUARDO “EDDIE” CANTU the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
Attachments:
8.
Constables:
A.
AI-52718
Constable Pct. 1 - LBSP 16 (1284):
1. Authorization and approval to accept the Local Border Security Program FY 2016 Grant (LBSP-16).
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
2. Authorization for County Judge, as authorized official, to electronically sign grant award form and related documents.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
3. Authorization to pay overtime reimbursable under the grant terms and conditions.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
4. Approval of Certification of Revenues, as certified by the County Auditor, for the Local Border Security Program FY 2016 (LBSP-16).
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 – Unanimously
5. Approval to appropriate the budget for LBSP-16 grant award in the amount of $30,000.00.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
1. Authorization and approval to accept the Local Border Security Program FY 2016 Grant (LBSP-16).
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
2. Authorization for County Judge, as authorized official, to electronically sign grant award form and related documents.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
3. Authorization to pay overtime reimbursable under the grant terms and conditions.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
4. Approval of Certification of Revenues, as certified by the County Auditor, for the Local Border Security Program FY 2016 (LBSP-16).
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 – Unanimously
5. Approval to appropriate the budget for LBSP-16 grant award in the amount of $30,000.00.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
Attachments:
B.
AI-52691
Constable Pct. 2 - LBSP 16 (1284):
1. Authorization and approval to accept the Local Border Security Program FY 2016 Grant (LBSP-16).
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
2. Authorization for County Judge, as authorized official, to electronically sign grant award form and related documents.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
3. Authorization to pay overtime reimbursable under the grant terms and conditions.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
4. Approval of Certification of Revenues as certified by the County Auditor for the Local Border Security Program FY 2016 (LBSP-16).
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 – Unanimously
5. Approval to appropriate the budget for LBSP-16 grant award in the amount of $30,000.00.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
1. Authorization and approval to accept the Local Border Security Program FY 2016 Grant (LBSP-16).
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
2. Authorization for County Judge, as authorized official, to electronically sign grant award form and related documents.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
3. Authorization to pay overtime reimbursable under the grant terms and conditions.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
4. Approval of Certification of Revenues as certified by the County Auditor for the Local Border Security Program FY 2016 (LBSP-16).
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 – Unanimously
5. Approval to appropriate the budget for LBSP-16 grant award in the amount of $30,000.00.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
C.
AI-52690
Constable Pct. 3 - LBSP FY16 (1284)
1. Authorization and approval to accept the Local Border Security Program (LBSP) FY16 Grant Award No: 2998901.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 2, EDUARDO “EDDIE” CANTU, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
2. Authorization for County Judge, as authorized official, to electronically sign grant award form and related documents.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 2, EDUARDO “EDDIE” CANTU, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
3. Authorization to pay overtime reimbursable under the grant terms and conditions.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
4. Approval of Certification of Revenues, as certified by the County Auditor, for the Local Border Security Program FY 2016 (LBSP-16)
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
5. Approval to appropriate the budget for LBSP-16 grant award in the amount of $80,000.00.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
1. Authorization and approval to accept the Local Border Security Program (LBSP) FY16 Grant Award No: 2998901.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 2, EDUARDO “EDDIE” CANTU, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
2. Authorization for County Judge, as authorized official, to electronically sign grant award form and related documents.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 2, EDUARDO “EDDIE” CANTU, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
3. Authorization to pay overtime reimbursable under the grant terms and conditions.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
4. Approval of Certification of Revenues, as certified by the County Auditor, for the Local Border Security Program FY 2016 (LBSP-16)
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
5. Approval to appropriate the budget for LBSP-16 grant award in the amount of $80,000.00.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
Attachments:
D.
AI-52722
Constable Pct. 4 - LBSP FY16 (1284):
1. Authorization and approval to accept the Local Border Security Program FY2016 Grant (LBSP-16).
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
2. Authorization for County Judge, as authorized official, to electronically sign grant award form and related documents.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
3. Authorization to pay overtime reimbursable under the grant terms and conditions.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
4. Approval of Certification of Revenues, as certified by the County Auditor, for the Local Border Security Program FY2016 (LBSP-16).
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
5. Approval to appropriate the budget for LBSP FY16 grant award in the amount of $65,000.00.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
Court proceeded to Item.11.A.
1. Authorization and approval to accept the Local Border Security Program FY2016 Grant (LBSP-16).
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
2. Authorization for County Judge, as authorized official, to electronically sign grant award form and related documents.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
3. Authorization to pay overtime reimbursable under the grant terms and conditions.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
4. Approval of Certification of Revenues, as certified by the County Auditor, for the Local Border Security Program FY2016 (LBSP-16).
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
5. Approval to appropriate the budget for LBSP FY16 grant award in the amount of $65,000.00.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
Court proceeded to Item.11.A.
Attachments:
9.
Tax Office - Paul Villarreal:
A.
AI-52574
Presentation for discussion, consideration, acceptance and approval to publish in the register of the Secretary of State the proposed rules that would state the nature and requirements of all available formal and informal procedures to license motor vehicle title services and runners.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 2, EDUARDO “EDDIE” CANTU, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 -Unanimously
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 2, EDUARDO “EDDIE” CANTU, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 -Unanimously
Attachments:
10.
Sheriff's Office:
A.
AI-52692
Sheriff's Office - LBSP FY16 (1284):
1. Authorization and approval to accept the Local Border Security Program (LBSP) FY16 grant.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
2. Authorization for County Judge, as authorized official, to electronically sign grant award form and related documents.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
3. Authorization to pay overtime reimbursable under the grant terms and conditions.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 – Unanimously
4. Approval of Certification of Revenues as certified by the County Auditor for the Local Border Security Program FY 2016 (LBSP-16).
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 2, EDUARDO “EDDIE” CANTU, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 -Unanimously
5. Approval to appropriate the budget for the LBSP-16 grant award in the amount of $175,000.00.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
1. Authorization and approval to accept the Local Border Security Program (LBSP) FY16 grant.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
2. Authorization for County Judge, as authorized official, to electronically sign grant award form and related documents.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
3. Authorization to pay overtime reimbursable under the grant terms and conditions.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 – Unanimously
4. Approval of Certification of Revenues as certified by the County Auditor for the Local Border Security Program FY 2016 (LBSP-16).
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 2, EDUARDO “EDDIE” CANTU, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 -Unanimously
5. Approval to appropriate the budget for the LBSP-16 grant award in the amount of $175,000.00.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
Attachments:
B.
AI-52725
1. Approval of Interlocal Cooperation Agreement for Shooting Range Use/Training between the Hidalgo County Sheriff's Office and Texas Alcohol Beverage Commission.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
2. Authorization for County Judge, as authorized official, and County Sheriff to sign two original documents.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
2. Authorization for County Judge, as authorized official, and County Sheriff to sign two original documents.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
Attachments:
C.
AI-52700
Requesting approval for County Treasurer to process payment for fuel reimbursement in the amount of $66.56 for Division Chief Oscar Montoya after auditing procedures are completed by County Auditor. Division Chief Oscar Montoya paid for fuel expense with personal credit card due to U.S. Voyager Card not working properly.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
Court proceeded to Item.22.A.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
Court proceeded to Item.22.A.
Attachments:
11.
Executive Office:
A.
AI-52824
Approval to designate proxies for the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) Policy Board and submit necessary forms
As the designee Commissioner Palacios appointed:
Alternative - Commissioner Eduardo "Eddie" Cantu
Proxy No. 1 - Bobby Villarreal
Proxy No. 2 - Michael Leo
Proxy No. 3 - Jesus "Jesse" Ozuna
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 2, EDUARDO “EDDIE” CANTU the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
Commissioner Flores stepped away from the meeting.
Commissioner Palacios announced they will be bringing updated agendas as they prepare for the presentations.
Court proceeded to Item.11.C.
As the designee Commissioner Palacios appointed:
Alternative - Commissioner Eduardo "Eddie" Cantu
Proxy No. 1 - Bobby Villarreal
Proxy No. 2 - Michael Leo
Proxy No. 3 - Jesus "Jesse" Ozuna
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 2, EDUARDO “EDDIE” CANTU the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
Commissioner Flores stepped away from the meeting.
Commissioner Palacios announced they will be bringing updated agendas as they prepare for the presentations.
Court proceeded to Item.11.C.
B.
AI-52810
Approval of an Order prohibiting the carrying of weapons into County Judicial and Correctional Facilities that are exempted from the General Rules permitting the open carrying of firearms by handgun license holders
Mr. Valde Guerra announced to the court that concerns have arise in relation to the new Open Carry Law. He explained by working with the District Attorney’s Office they have prepared an Order that meets with the allowable exceptions for open carrying in governmental buildings.
Judge Garcia read a statement in relation.
The Texas Legislature recently amended state law, allowing for the open and concealed carrying of handguns by handgun license holders in government buildings with certain exceptions. An exception is that a licensee may not carry a handgun onto the premises of a court or offices utilized by the court. Nor, may a licensee carry a handgun on the premises of a correctional facility.
In an effort to protect the safety and security of those who participate in the judicial process, and to ensure all members of this community have access to the court system, the Hidalgo County Commissioners Court is considering today an order to prohibit weapons from being brought in the Courthouse, the Courthouse Annex (which houses the 13th Court of Appeals), the 430th District Court and the 449th District Court (housed outside the courthouse premises). These buildings share halls, walkways, entrances, exits, elevators, common areas, stairwells, restrooms, etc., which are used by persons involved in the judicial process, including judges, jurors, witnesses, parties, prosecutors, attorneys and other judicial/court personnel. Further, I have been advised by the Presiding Judge in Hidalgo County, Judge Bobby Flores, 139th Judicial District Court, that these areas are essential to the operations of the courts in Hidalgo County and that it would be impossible to conduct judicial proceedings without considering the safety and security of the entirety of the premises housing the courts and court offices.
This law went into effect January 1, 2016. Upon the passage of this order by the Hidalgo County Commissioners Court, Hidalgo County will post appropriate signage at the locations allowed by law.
Commissioner Flores underlined his desire to keep working on the order to facilitate protection to other county buildings.
Ricardo Rodriguez, District Attorney took time to clarify some points in reference to the new regulations. He assured the court members that he relates to their valid concerns to protect the rest of the buildings, at the moment they are acting on what is being issued as of today. Nonetheless, it does not mean they will not come back if something changes within the law. As it could possibly be that at some point there might be some exceptions to a person coming into certain aspects of the courthouse or possibly posting notices in other governmental buildings as well.
Mr. Rodriguez mentioned that there’s still ongoing litigation, as there has been lawsuits filed against the state based on this matter.
Commissioner Palacios requested to have personnel be trained as to how to deal with individuals and open carrying. He emphasized on the concern he and Commissioner Flores have to secure the wellbeing of employees and other governmental buildings.
Mr. Rodriguez reminded the court that they have had the concealed weapon in placed for a long time; it is now the Open Carrying Law. He is hopeful that people will get accustomed and that things will flow in a positive direction without having any problems. Therefore, yes they can always come back and addressed any changes to the matter.
Judge Garcia disclosed they have met twice with the Sheriff’s Office and the District Attorney’s Office, along with the Administration office. They have concluded that base on the interpretation of the new law they can pass this order to prevent open carrying guns into the facilities they have mentioned. He believes there are other extensions of the buildings that need to be protected. Therefore, the order will be approve under the present interpretation.
Once more, Mr. Rodriguez indicated that based on the interpretation they feel they are protected and safe. Nevertheless it does not mean that this interpretation could later change.
Under public participation, Mrs. McClaugherty opened up about the Open Carrying Law. She voiced to the court that they shouldn’t try to keep away those individuals who have a Concealed Handgun License, because their background has been checked by the State and the FBI.Mrs. McClaugherty also made reference to Senate Bill 273, in specific Sec. 46.035 effective September 1, 2015.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
Finally Mr. Rodriguez expressed his comfort in regards to the standards of this order, assuring that governmental buildings are safe.
Court proceeded to Item.12.A.
Mr. Valde Guerra announced to the court that concerns have arise in relation to the new Open Carry Law. He explained by working with the District Attorney’s Office they have prepared an Order that meets with the allowable exceptions for open carrying in governmental buildings.
Judge Garcia read a statement in relation.
The Texas Legislature recently amended state law, allowing for the open and concealed carrying of handguns by handgun license holders in government buildings with certain exceptions. An exception is that a licensee may not carry a handgun onto the premises of a court or offices utilized by the court. Nor, may a licensee carry a handgun on the premises of a correctional facility.
In an effort to protect the safety and security of those who participate in the judicial process, and to ensure all members of this community have access to the court system, the Hidalgo County Commissioners Court is considering today an order to prohibit weapons from being brought in the Courthouse, the Courthouse Annex (which houses the 13th Court of Appeals), the 430th District Court and the 449th District Court (housed outside the courthouse premises). These buildings share halls, walkways, entrances, exits, elevators, common areas, stairwells, restrooms, etc., which are used by persons involved in the judicial process, including judges, jurors, witnesses, parties, prosecutors, attorneys and other judicial/court personnel. Further, I have been advised by the Presiding Judge in Hidalgo County, Judge Bobby Flores, 139th Judicial District Court, that these areas are essential to the operations of the courts in Hidalgo County and that it would be impossible to conduct judicial proceedings without considering the safety and security of the entirety of the premises housing the courts and court offices.
This law went into effect January 1, 2016. Upon the passage of this order by the Hidalgo County Commissioners Court, Hidalgo County will post appropriate signage at the locations allowed by law.
Commissioner Flores underlined his desire to keep working on the order to facilitate protection to other county buildings.
Ricardo Rodriguez, District Attorney took time to clarify some points in reference to the new regulations. He assured the court members that he relates to their valid concerns to protect the rest of the buildings, at the moment they are acting on what is being issued as of today. Nonetheless, it does not mean they will not come back if something changes within the law. As it could possibly be that at some point there might be some exceptions to a person coming into certain aspects of the courthouse or possibly posting notices in other governmental buildings as well.
Mr. Rodriguez mentioned that there’s still ongoing litigation, as there has been lawsuits filed against the state based on this matter.
Commissioner Palacios requested to have personnel be trained as to how to deal with individuals and open carrying. He emphasized on the concern he and Commissioner Flores have to secure the wellbeing of employees and other governmental buildings.
Mr. Rodriguez reminded the court that they have had the concealed weapon in placed for a long time; it is now the Open Carrying Law. He is hopeful that people will get accustomed and that things will flow in a positive direction without having any problems. Therefore, yes they can always come back and addressed any changes to the matter.
Judge Garcia disclosed they have met twice with the Sheriff’s Office and the District Attorney’s Office, along with the Administration office. They have concluded that base on the interpretation of the new law they can pass this order to prevent open carrying guns into the facilities they have mentioned. He believes there are other extensions of the buildings that need to be protected. Therefore, the order will be approve under the present interpretation.
Once more, Mr. Rodriguez indicated that based on the interpretation they feel they are protected and safe. Nevertheless it does not mean that this interpretation could later change.
Under public participation, Mrs. McClaugherty opened up about the Open Carrying Law. She voiced to the court that they shouldn’t try to keep away those individuals who have a Concealed Handgun License, because their background has been checked by the State and the FBI.Mrs. McClaugherty also made reference to Senate Bill 273, in specific Sec. 46.035 effective September 1, 2015.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
Finally Mr. Rodriguez expressed his comfort in regards to the standards of this order, assuring that governmental buildings are safe.
Court proceeded to Item.12.A.
Attachments:
C.
AI-52685
1. Discussion regarding Going Up the Chisholm Trail Historical Marker Re-establishment Project
Mr. Guerra announced that there’s a request to place a historical marker on the courthouse grounds. There is a process and approval form that goes to the Texas Department of Transportation. They have looked into the propose area and it does not seem to be imposing with traffic coming into the courthouse.
The marker would be located about 30 ft to 40 ft from the left side entrance of the courthouse.
Commissioner Flores joined the meeting.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 – Unanimously
2. Authority for County Judge to sign form authorizing Texas Department of Transportation (TXDOT) to coordinate the approval of an Official Texas Historical Marker to be placed on public rights of ways.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
Mr. Guerra announced that there’s a request to place a historical marker on the courthouse grounds. There is a process and approval form that goes to the Texas Department of Transportation. They have looked into the propose area and it does not seem to be imposing with traffic coming into the courthouse.
The marker would be located about 30 ft to 40 ft from the left side entrance of the courthouse.
Commissioner Flores joined the meeting.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 – Unanimously
2. Authority for County Judge to sign form authorizing Texas Department of Transportation (TXDOT) to coordinate the approval of an Official Texas Historical Marker to be placed on public rights of ways.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
D.
AI-52781
Discussion, consideration and action regarding Agreement between County of Hidalgo and Linn-San Manuel Volunteer Fire Department, Inc.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 – Unanimously
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 – Unanimously
Attachments:
E.
AI-52706
Approval of Hidalgo County Library System ByLaws
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
Attachments:
F.
AI-52773
1. Approval to accept the settlement agreement offer from the Office of the Attorney General in the amount of $4,000.00 to settle auto accident claim with County vehicle. (Constable Precinct 1)
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 2, EDUARDO “EDDIE” CANTU, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE FLORES, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 -Unanimously
2. Approval to authorize Valde Guerra, County Executive Officer, to sign the Release and Indemnity Agreement form and any other documents to settle the auto claim with the Office of the Attorney General. (Constable Precinct 1)
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 – Unanimously
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 2, EDUARDO “EDDIE” CANTU, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE FLORES, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 -Unanimously
2. Approval to authorize Valde Guerra, County Executive Officer, to sign the Release and Indemnity Agreement form and any other documents to settle the auto claim with the Office of the Attorney General. (Constable Precinct 1)
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 – Unanimously
G.
AI-52817
Requesting permission by Museum of South Texas History to use county parking lots near the museum for use by visitors to the museum for the following events for 2016:
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 2, EDUARDO “EDDIE” CANTU, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
Court proceeded to Item14.A.
| EVENT | DATE | TIME |
| Pioneer & Ranching Crafts Day | Saturday, Feb. 20th | 9am to 5pm |
| Summer Nights at the Museum | Thursdays, June 9th & 30th & July 14th | 7pm to 9pm |
| Fandango! 2016 | Saturday, Oct. 8th | 5:30 pm to 11pm |
| Dia de los Muertos | Saturday, Oct. 29th | 9am to 5pm |
| Fiesta De Noche Buena | Sunday, Dec. 11th | 1pm to 5pm |
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 2, EDUARDO “EDDIE” CANTU, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
Court proceeded to Item14.A.
Attachments:
12.
Human Resources:
A.
AI-52760
District Attorney - Domestic Violence Specialty Prosecutor (1281)/DA Investigation HB65 (1223):
1. Discussion, consideration, and approval of the following personnel actions, effective next pay period of 01/11/2016:
Mr. Valde Guerra commented that these actions refer to law enforcement and are in line with the actions taken by Commissioners Court during the budget process along with other law enforcement actions.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
2. Approval to revise the salary schedule in accordance with Commissioners Court action.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
1. Discussion, consideration, and approval of the following personnel actions, effective next pay period of 01/11/2016:
| Action | Dept/Program | Slot No. | Position Title | Current Budgeted Salary/Allowance |
Proposed Budgeted Salary/Allowance |
Total Adjustment |
|
Salary Adjustment
(Increase) |
080-018 | G002 | Assistant District Attorney III | $64,993.00 | $65,405.00 | $412.00 |
| 080-007 | A142 | $900.00 | $900.00 | $0.00 |
Mr. Valde Guerra commented that these actions refer to law enforcement and are in line with the actions taken by Commissioners Court during the budget process along with other law enforcement actions.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
2. Approval to revise the salary schedule in accordance with Commissioners Court action.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
Attachments:
B.
AI-52695
HIDTA Chapter 59 Asset Forfeiture (1251):
1. Approval of 2016 HIDTA Chapter 59 Asset Forfeiture Fund Budget (1251).
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 2, EDUARDO “EDDIE” CANTU, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
2. Approval of appropriation of the HIDTA Chapter 59 Asset Forfeiture funds.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 2, EDUARDO “EDDIE” CANTU, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
HIDTA US Treasury Asset Forfeiture (1252):
1. Approval of 2016 HIDTA US Treasury Asset Forfeiture Fund Budget (1252).
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
2. Approval of appropriation of the HIDTA US Treasury Asset Forfeiture funds.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
HIDTA Chapter 59 Asset Forfeiture (1251)/HIDTA US Treasury E-Sharing (1252):
1. Approval of the following personnel actions, effective 01/01/16:
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 2, EDUARDO “EDDIE” CANTU, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
2. Approval to waive posting, hiring and enrollment procedures and assign employee #114863 to Slot No. 0027, Criminal Investigator II position.
3. Approval to waive posting, hiring and enrollment procedures and assign employee #072613 to Slot No. 0028, Criminal Investigator II position.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval on 2 and 3.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
4. Approval to revise the salary schedule in accordance with Commissioners Court action.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
HIDTA Task Force (1291) / HIDTA Chapter 59 Asset Forfeiture (1251):
1. Approval of the salary increases and redistribution of salary allocations, as listed on Exhibit A, effective 01/11/16.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 – Unanimously
2. Approval to revise the salary schedule in accordance with Commissioners Court action.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
HIDTA Other Asset Forfeiture Fund (1253):
1. Approval of 2016 HIDTA Other Asset Forfeiture Budget.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
2. Approval of appropriation of the HIDTA Other Asset Forfeiture funds.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
HIDTA US Justice E-Sharing Asset Forfeiture Fund (1254):
1. Approval of 2016 HIDTA US Justice Asset Forfeiture Budget.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
2. Approval of appropriation of the HIDTA US Justice Asset Forfeiture funds.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
3. Authorization to pay overtime to the Hidalgo County HIDTA Task Force Criminal Investigators from January 1, 2016 - December 31, 2016 under the US Justice E-Sharing terms and conditions.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
Ms. Martinez mentioned that these increases and the salary allocations are coming strictly from chapter 59 funds, no general funds were used to give these increases.
1. Approval of 2016 HIDTA Chapter 59 Asset Forfeiture Fund Budget (1251).
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 2, EDUARDO “EDDIE” CANTU, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
2. Approval of appropriation of the HIDTA Chapter 59 Asset Forfeiture funds.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 2, EDUARDO “EDDIE” CANTU, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
HIDTA US Treasury Asset Forfeiture (1252):
1. Approval of 2016 HIDTA US Treasury Asset Forfeiture Fund Budget (1252).
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
2. Approval of appropriation of the HIDTA US Treasury Asset Forfeiture funds.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
HIDTA Chapter 59 Asset Forfeiture (1251)/HIDTA US Treasury E-Sharing (1252):
1. Approval of the following personnel actions, effective 01/01/16:
| Action | Slot# | Dept/ Program |
Position Title | Current Budgeted Salary |
Proposed Budgeted Salary |
| Delete | 0001 | 270-012 (HIDTA US Treasury) |
Criminal Investigator II | $61,800.00 | $0.00 |
| Delete | 0002 | 270-012 (HIDTA US Treasury) |
Criminal Investigator II | $61,800.00 | $0.00 |
| Create | 0027 | 270-011 (HIDTA Chapter 59) |
Criminal Investigator II | $0.00 | $61,800.00 |
| Create | 0028 | 270-011 (HIDTA Chapter 59) |
Criminal Investigator II | $0.00 | $61,800.00 |
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 2, EDUARDO “EDDIE” CANTU, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
2. Approval to waive posting, hiring and enrollment procedures and assign employee #114863 to Slot No. 0027, Criminal Investigator II position.
3. Approval to waive posting, hiring and enrollment procedures and assign employee #072613 to Slot No. 0028, Criminal Investigator II position.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval on 2 and 3.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
4. Approval to revise the salary schedule in accordance with Commissioners Court action.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
HIDTA Task Force (1291) / HIDTA Chapter 59 Asset Forfeiture (1251):
1. Approval of the salary increases and redistribution of salary allocations, as listed on Exhibit A, effective 01/11/16.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 – Unanimously
2. Approval to revise the salary schedule in accordance with Commissioners Court action.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
HIDTA Other Asset Forfeiture Fund (1253):
1. Approval of 2016 HIDTA Other Asset Forfeiture Budget.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
2. Approval of appropriation of the HIDTA Other Asset Forfeiture funds.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
HIDTA US Justice E-Sharing Asset Forfeiture Fund (1254):
1. Approval of 2016 HIDTA US Justice Asset Forfeiture Budget.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
2. Approval of appropriation of the HIDTA US Justice Asset Forfeiture funds.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
3. Authorization to pay overtime to the Hidalgo County HIDTA Task Force Criminal Investigators from January 1, 2016 - December 31, 2016 under the US Justice E-Sharing terms and conditions.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
Ms. Martinez mentioned that these increases and the salary allocations are coming strictly from chapter 59 funds, no general funds were used to give these increases.
Attachments:
C.
AI-52715
Public Defender (1100):
1. Requesting waiver of the Budget Amendment Policy - Personnel Related Amendments.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 – Unanimously
2. Discussion, consideration, and approval of the following personnel action effective next pay period, 01/11/2016:
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 – Unanimously
3. Approval of interdepartmental transfer.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
4. Approval to revise salary schedule in accordance to Commissioners Court action.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
Court proceeded to Item.20.A.
1. Requesting waiver of the Budget Amendment Policy - Personnel Related Amendments.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 – Unanimously
2. Discussion, consideration, and approval of the following personnel action effective next pay period, 01/11/2016:
| Action | Slot# | Dept. | Position Title | Current Budgeted Salary |
Proposed Position Title |
Proposed Budgeted Salary |
| Reclassification | 0001 | 085-003 | Public Defender II | $55,437.00 | Public Defender III | $62,475.00 |
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 – Unanimously
3. Approval of interdepartmental transfer.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
4. Approval to revise salary schedule in accordance to Commissioners Court action.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
Court proceeded to Item.20.A.
13.
Health & Human Services Department:
A.
AI-52774
1. Discussion, approval & action of the University of Texas Rio Grande Valley (UT-RGV) Graduate Medical Education Program Letter of Agreement for the Preventive Medicine Residency Program between UT-RGV and the County of Hidalgo, by and through the Hidalgo County Health & Human Services Department.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 4 - 0 - Unanimously
Commissioner Cuellar joined the meeting.
2. Requesting authorization for County Judge Ramon Garcia to sign as the authorized official for the UT-RGV Program Letter of Agreement for the Preventive Medicine Residency Program in collaboration with Hidalgo County Health & Human Services Department.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 2, EDUARDO “EDDIE” CANTU, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 4 - 0 - Unanimously
Commissioner Cuellar joined the meeting.
2. Requesting authorization for County Judge Ramon Garcia to sign as the authorized official for the UT-RGV Program Letter of Agreement for the Preventive Medicine Residency Program in collaboration with Hidalgo County Health & Human Services Department.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 2, EDUARDO “EDDIE” CANTU, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
Attachments:
B.
AI-52757
1. Requesting approval to accept the TB/PC Federal grant contract #2016-001400-00 in the amount of $437,771.00 for the period of 01/01/2016 to 12/31/2016.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
2. Requesting approval for County Judge to e-sign the TB/PC Federal grant contract, Certification Regarding Lobbying Statement and the Fiscal Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act Certification Statement.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 – Unanimously
3. Requesting approval of the Certification of Revenue in the amount of $437,771.00.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
4. Requesting approval of the budget appropriation in the amount of $437,771.00 in grant funds and $87,554.00 in local match funds.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
2. Requesting approval for County Judge to e-sign the TB/PC Federal grant contract, Certification Regarding Lobbying Statement and the Fiscal Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act Certification Statement.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 – Unanimously
3. Requesting approval of the Certification of Revenue in the amount of $437,771.00.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
4. Requesting approval of the budget appropriation in the amount of $437,771.00 in grant funds and $87,554.00 in local match funds.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
Attachments:
C.
Health Care Funding District:
1.
Discussion and/or action, including but not limited to Health Care Funding District and/or Expenditures
No action taken on this item.
No action taken on this item.
D.
Indigent Health Care Program:
1.
Discussion and/or action, including but not limited to Indigent Health Care Program and 1115 Waiver and/or Expenditures
No action taken on this item.
Court proceeded to Item.11.B.
No action taken on this item.
Court proceeded to Item.11.B.
14.
Fire Marshal's Office:
A.
AI-52795
Discussion and approval of the following 2016 Rural Emergency Service MOU Agreement(s) with:
1.) Linn San Manuel Fire Department Inc.
2.) Monte Alto Volunteer Fire Department
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 2, EDUARDO “EDDIE” CANTU, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
1.) Linn San Manuel Fire Department Inc.
2.) Monte Alto Volunteer Fire Department
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 2, EDUARDO “EDDIE” CANTU, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
Attachments:
15.
Urban County:
A.
AI-52796
The Urban County Program on behalf of the City of Hidalgo is requesting approval of extension of the 90 day bid expiration for the bids received on September 9, 2015 from E-Con Group, LLC.
Mrs. Diana Serna commented on Dr. Adams petition to repair Sioux Road and Old La Blanca. She announced that they have already executed a contract with engineers to begin working on those roads.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
Mrs. Diana Serna commented on Dr. Adams petition to repair Sioux Road and Old La Blanca. She announced that they have already executed a contract with engineers to begin working on those roads.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
Attachments:
B.
AI-52818
The Urban County Program on behalf of the City of Hidalgo is requesting consideration and action to award and enter into a construction contract with E-Con Group, LLC in the amount of $1,895,044.00. UCP funds in Years 23, 24, 25 and 26 (2010, 2011, 2012 and 2013) Non-Residential Historical Preservation line items will be used as well as funding from the City of Hidalgo.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
Attachments:
C.
AI-52769
Urban County Program on behalf of the City of Weslaco is requesting authority to purchase playground equipment for Cavazos Park. Purchase and installation will be made from Park Place Recreation Designs, Inc. (Contract # 423-13) an approved vendor through Hidalgo County's membership and participation with Buyboard. The total amount of Purchase is $47,387.55, utilizing FY 27 (2014) Weslaco Park, Recreational Facility Funds and the City of Weslaco Funds.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 – Unanimously
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 – Unanimously
Attachments:
D.
AI-52815
The Urban County Program on behalf of the City of San Juan is requesting approval of a best and final negotiated contract for professional engineering services with Cruz-Hogan Consultants Inc., in the amount of $24,240.00 utilizing CDBG FY 27 (2014) San Juan Water & Sewer Improvement funds.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 2, EDUARDO “EDDIE” CANTU, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 – Unanimously
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 2, EDUARDO “EDDIE” CANTU, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 – Unanimously
Attachments:
E.
AI-52822
1. Hidalgo County Precinct No. 1 requests approval from Hidalgo County Commissioners' Court to enter into an Interlocal Cooperation Agreement with the City of Edcouch for the overlaying of streets in the amount of $268,322.20 utilizing FY 27 (2014) UCP Street Improvements funding.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
2. Requesting authorization for county judge to sign the required documents.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 2, EDUARDO “EDDIE” CANTU the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
2. Requesting authorization for county judge to sign the required documents.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 2, EDUARDO “EDDIE” CANTU the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
Attachments:
16.
Elections Administration:
A.
Discussion and/or action, including but not limited to Elections updates
No action taken on this item.
No action taken on this item.
17.
Planning Department:
A.
AI-52697
1. Preliminary Approval
a. Jecca Subdivision- Pct. 3 (Gorgonio Moreno) (Bentsen Palm Drive & Mile 3 North Road)
b. Eduardo’s No. 13 Subdivision- Pct. 3 (Aniceto Izaguirre) (Trosper Road & Mile 4 North Road)
c. M. Solis Subdivision- Pct. 1 (Melesio Solis) (Mile 12 ½ North Road & Mile 4 West Road)
d. J.O.A. Subdivision- Pct. 2 (Oriel Alvarez) (El Gato Road & Border Road)
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
2. Final Approval with Financial Guarantee
a. Pueblo de Palmas No. 17- Pct. 4 (J. Gary Frisby) (Ramseyer Road & Cesar Chavez Road)
Letter of credit: $416, 240
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 – Unanimously
3. Reimbursement of Financial Guarantee
a. David Garza Subdivision- Pct. 3
b. Tierra De Santa Cruz Subdivision- Pct. 4
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 2, EDUARDO “EDDIE” CANTU the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
a. Jecca Subdivision- Pct. 3 (Gorgonio Moreno) (Bentsen Palm Drive & Mile 3 North Road)
b. Eduardo’s No. 13 Subdivision- Pct. 3 (Aniceto Izaguirre) (Trosper Road & Mile 4 North Road)
c. M. Solis Subdivision- Pct. 1 (Melesio Solis) (Mile 12 ½ North Road & Mile 4 West Road)
d. J.O.A. Subdivision- Pct. 2 (Oriel Alvarez) (El Gato Road & Border Road)
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
2. Final Approval with Financial Guarantee
a. Pueblo de Palmas No. 17- Pct. 4 (J. Gary Frisby) (Ramseyer Road & Cesar Chavez Road)
Letter of credit: $416, 240
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 – Unanimously
3. Reimbursement of Financial Guarantee
a. David Garza Subdivision- Pct. 3
b. Tierra De Santa Cruz Subdivision- Pct. 4
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 2, EDUARDO “EDDIE” CANTU the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
Attachments:
18.
Precinct #1 - Comm. Cuellar:
A.
AI-52785
Authorization and approval to appoint Mark McCaleb to the Emergency Services District No. 1 Board pursuant to Texas Health and Safety Code Section 775.034
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 2, EDUARDO “EDDIE” CANTU, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE FLORES, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 -Unanimously
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 2, EDUARDO “EDDIE” CANTU, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE FLORES, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 -Unanimously
Attachments:
19.
Precinct #2 - Comm. Cantu:
A.
AI-52820
Approval of Economically Disadvantaged County (EDC) Program Application and Affidavit for Regional Hike & Bike Trail - CSJ: 0921-02-346 with authority for the County Judge to sign all required documentation.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 – Unanimously
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 – Unanimously
Attachments:
B.
AI-52738
Approval of closing documents and authority for the County Judge to execute documents for Lot 2, Blk 21, Floodway Levee, Pharr, Texas - McColl Road Project (Daniel Dillard and Sandra L. Dillard).
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
Court proceeded to Item.21.B.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
Court proceeded to Item.21.B.
Attachments:
20.
Precinct #3 - Comm. Flores:
A.
AI-52814
Precinct #3 - Road Maintenance (1200)
1. Approval to create one (1) full time temporary position not to exceed six (6) months.
1. Approval to create one (1) full time temporary position not to exceed six (6) months.
| Slot# | Dept./Program | PositionTitle | Proposed Budgeted Salary |
| T 0100 | 123-005 | Office Clerk | $30,000.00 |
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
2. Approval of intradepartmental transfer.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 2, EDUARDO “EDDIE” CANTU the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
3. Approval to revise the salary schedule in accordance with Commissioners Court action.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 – Unanimously
Court proceeded to Item.9.A.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
2. Approval of intradepartmental transfer.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 2, EDUARDO “EDDIE” CANTU the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
3. Approval to revise the salary schedule in accordance with Commissioners Court action.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 – Unanimously
Court proceeded to Item.9.A.
Attachments:
21.
Precinct #4 - Comm. Palacios:
A.
AI-52809
Resolution in honor of Hidalgo County Precinct #4 employees of the year.
Precinct 4 employees of the year were acknowledged for their hard work and dedication.
Leonardo Espinoza from the Road & Bridge Department.
Miguel Cabrera, Drainage Department.
Joel Beltran, Park Coordinator.
Jorge Guzman from the Sanitation Department.
Lizabeth Gonzalez, Public Afairs.
Maria Romero, San Carlos volunteer.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 – Unanimously
Commissioner Cuellar stepped away from the meeting.
Court proceeded to Item.13.A.
Precinct 4 employees of the year were acknowledged for their hard work and dedication.
Leonardo Espinoza from the Road & Bridge Department.
Miguel Cabrera, Drainage Department.
Joel Beltran, Park Coordinator.
Jorge Guzman from the Sanitation Department.
Lizabeth Gonzalez, Public Afairs.
Maria Romero, San Carlos volunteer.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 – Unanimously
Commissioner Cuellar stepped away from the meeting.
Court proceeded to Item.13.A.
Attachments:
B.
AI-52739
1. Approval of Amendment and Restatement of that certain Interlocal Cooperation Agreement between the County of Hidalgo and City of Edinburg, Texas concerning certain improvements to FM 1925 (Monte Cristo) From McColl Rd to 1,500 ft West of 10th Street
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
2. In accordance with Texas Govt. Code Section 791.014, approval of proposed project regarding certain improvements to FM 1925 (Monte Cristo) From McColl Rd to 1,500 ft West of 10th Street
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
Court proceeded to Item.22.B.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
2. In accordance with Texas Govt. Code Section 791.014, approval of proposed project regarding certain improvements to FM 1925 (Monte Cristo) From McColl Rd to 1,500 ft West of 10th Street
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
Court proceeded to Item.22.B.
Attachments:
22.
Budget & Management:
A.
AI-52797
Discussion, consideration and possible action on commencing the mid-year Salary Related Adjustments (approved during FY2016 Budget Adoption) on January 11, 2016.
Sergio Cruz, commented that base on their request he is now presenting an update status of the budget. He added that as far as the 2016 Budget and based on the auditor’s estimates that they use to develop the budget, and based on the adopted budget of $189.3 million dollars. They have an estimate fund balance of $20.7 million dollars, which is roughly about 10.95% of the operating budget. At the moment they have about $10.5 million dollars of unexpended expenditures from the 2015 budget. However they still have expenditures from the 2015 period that need to be recorded.
Currently they are estimating to lapse anywhere between $1 million to about $1.5 million dollars from the 2015 Budget, increasing the current fund balance by about $1 million dollars bringing the percentage to about 11.5%.
Judge Garcia asked Mr. Cruz if this information was pertaining to the salary increases for the deputies and other personnel. Mr. Cruz confirmed with Judge Garcia that this was in relation. Judge Garcia mentioned that even thou he is in favor of the salary adjustments, they had talked about acting on it until the auditor certified the revenues which does not occur until March. He recalls discussing the date for July or moving it to March or April.
He questioned if the certification of revenues was something that was complete so early on. Mr. Cruz explained that the books will not closed until mid March and even after that, there are usually some adjustments to be made. This is merely a projection of how they feel they could end the fiscal year.
Judge Garcia reminded Mr. Eufracio that based on his recommendation in regards to the consideration of increasing salaries they postponed those increases until July 2016. This action was done in order to not go under the 10% figure they had imposed. Nonetheless, at that time they decided not to start the salary increases until July or possibly March or April. This action was to be done pending his certification of revenues and whether or not they would have the funds in place. Hence, now he is asking Mr. Eufracio if his certification of revenues is complete and if the funds are in place. Mr. Eufracio commented that he certifies revenues in the summer before they begin the budget process. The next time he certifies revenues will be in August, because the certification of revenues is only done once a year.
Commissioner Palacios questioned if Mr. Eufracio had been the one who certified the estimated fund balance for December 31, 2016 in the amount of $20, 744,074
Sergio Cruz notified to the commissioner that Mr. Eufracio was the one who certified the $25,474,432 beginning fund balance. This certification was done in September 2015, during the budget process. Furthermore according to Mr. Cruz the amount of $184,606,361 was estimated by the county auditor’s office for preparation of the 2016 budget, giving them an available resource of $210,080,793
On account of that and base on the budget adoption, and based on deferring the law enforcement and other adjustments to midyear the total adopted budget for 2016 was $189,336,719 leaving them with a fund balance of $20,744,074 giving them a percentage of 10.95%
Judge Garcia asked if the percentage could run the risk of coming down, if they approve the salary increases in January. Mr. Cruz clarified to the judge that this number would not come down, because any adjustments they make for this fiscal year budget would have to be done within the 2016 budget. They cannot go back and take $1.3 million dollars from the fund balance to make these types of adjustments. The money would have to be extracted from the $189,336,719 budget, for a total of $1,170,830 increase for the law enforcement and then another $202, 000 for other departments that requested adjustments. This would allow for a total cost of $1,372,830 if implemented by January 11, 2016.
Mr. Eufracio clarified to the court that the $25,474,432 is not a certification but rather an estimate of the evaluation of resources. Hence, his estimate of revenues of $184, 606, 793
Commissioner Cantu questioned the consequences it would bring to the 10.95% if they were to move forward with the $1,372,830 cost to implement. Mr. Cruz assured him that this would not affect the 10.95% because it would have to be done from the current adopted budget of $189,336,719 if funded right now they could use the projected lapses. The projected lapses are normally used due to vacancies or other matters that leave lapses. For the last 2 years they have had lapses of about $2.7 million annually.
Sheriff Guerra added to this discussion commenting that under the jail department they have had lapses of about $1.3 million and in the law enforcement they had about $679,000 if combine they total roughly about $2 million dollars in lapses for the year 2015. Mr. Eufracio indicated that these type of lapses are usually used by the budget office for other things that might come up throughout the year.
Mr. Cruz suggested to the court to consider other issues that could affect the budget for 2016 for instance, the Juvenile Boot Camp, the Juvenile Residential Placements, the Jail Room and Board and the Indigent Defense Grant. Mr. Cruz stated that since the Juvenile Boot Camp has not been producing the same revenues as before, they are expecting to inject about $400,000 into the facility. For the Juvenile Residential Placements they budgeted about $2.5 million dollars for 2016, however last year they spent about $4 million and are more likely on track to do the same this year. Under the Jail Room and Board they budgeted about $2.2 million for the 2016 budget but have seen the numbers come down.
Commissioners Cuellar and Flores commented that if they were to approve it for April 1, 2016 the second quarter they could potential save about $700 to $800 thousand dollars. Before making any decision Mr. Eufracio commented that he had not seen the 10.95% before and therefore needs to take time to look into it. On that note, Commissioner Flores suggested tabling the action until next meeting.
Commissioner Cuellar indicated that under his precinct they equally level off employees at $28,000 he still has 17 employees in the parks and sanitation departments that are included in the general fund. Mr. Valde Guerra commented to the commissioner that this is in regards to the law enforcement. Nonetheless, the commissioner stated that he just wanted to address the issue because it will affect other employees as well. He commented to Judge Garcia that there’s a total amount of $53,579 for the sanitation and parks departments. Once more Mr. Guerra commented that he thought these figures were only for the law enforcement. Commissioner Cuellar indicated that the $1,170,830 is for the law enforcement however, the $202,000 is for other departments. Resultantly, Mr. Cruz mentioned that some departments have already been taken care of and precinct 1 falls under the $202,000
Under the circumstances Judge Garcia expressed feeling comfortable approving the budget for the workers at the low end of the scale for precinct 1, ratifying that these employees ought to be earning the same as those in other precincts. Beyond that, he suggested waiting until late March or early April to have a better understanding of the numbers. In respect to this suggestion, Mr. Eufracio said he would take the time to look at the numbers and come back later.
Finally, Judge Garcia suggested taking action on the equalization of salaries for the sanitation and parks employees under precinct 1.
Mr. Raul Silguero made clarifications in regards to the comments of when the full pay period is. He stated that the full pay period in 2016 is period 1, being the pay date of January 8, 2016. However, the way the language is written it may appear that the employee’s salary increases including the COLA, would be effective January 11, 2016 but the employees would not be receiving the raise until sometime in February. Hence, the full pay period should be interpreted as the full pay period of the year which does not include January 1, 2016 but the second one would. All in all, Mr. Silguero suggested having the action be read as of January 1, 2016 to include the COLA as well.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval to approve salary adjustments for the Sanitation and Parks under Precinct 1, effective as of January 1, 2016 to include the COLA.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
Commissioner Flores reminded Mr. Eufracio to come back next meeting to further discuss the figures.
Mr. Valde Guerra repeated the amount of $53, 579 budgeted for precinct 1, parks and sanitation. With the total net that it might be, plus the COLA.
Before moving on, Judge Garcia requested for Sheriff Guerra to please understand their position, adding that they are fully appreciate of the work the sheriff's do. He also assured Sheriff Guerra that they will be working to compensate them fairly.
Sheriff Guerra assured Judge Garcia that they are willing to work with them and understand their difficult position. However he reminded the court that on the jail side, the DA's, the JP's together with the Sheriff's Office they have done a fantastic job of reducing the out of county inmate population. Last year they spent $2.2 million and feel they will be able to safe about $1 million for this year.
Commissioner Cantu added that they are always going to be dealing with moving targets when it comes to budget, sweep and estimates. Therefore is always good to look at past history.
Court proceeded to Item.4
Sergio Cruz, commented that base on their request he is now presenting an update status of the budget. He added that as far as the 2016 Budget and based on the auditor’s estimates that they use to develop the budget, and based on the adopted budget of $189.3 million dollars. They have an estimate fund balance of $20.7 million dollars, which is roughly about 10.95% of the operating budget. At the moment they have about $10.5 million dollars of unexpended expenditures from the 2015 budget. However they still have expenditures from the 2015 period that need to be recorded.
Currently they are estimating to lapse anywhere between $1 million to about $1.5 million dollars from the 2015 Budget, increasing the current fund balance by about $1 million dollars bringing the percentage to about 11.5%.
Judge Garcia asked Mr. Cruz if this information was pertaining to the salary increases for the deputies and other personnel. Mr. Cruz confirmed with Judge Garcia that this was in relation. Judge Garcia mentioned that even thou he is in favor of the salary adjustments, they had talked about acting on it until the auditor certified the revenues which does not occur until March. He recalls discussing the date for July or moving it to March or April.
He questioned if the certification of revenues was something that was complete so early on. Mr. Cruz explained that the books will not closed until mid March and even after that, there are usually some adjustments to be made. This is merely a projection of how they feel they could end the fiscal year.
Judge Garcia reminded Mr. Eufracio that based on his recommendation in regards to the consideration of increasing salaries they postponed those increases until July 2016. This action was done in order to not go under the 10% figure they had imposed. Nonetheless, at that time they decided not to start the salary increases until July or possibly March or April. This action was to be done pending his certification of revenues and whether or not they would have the funds in place. Hence, now he is asking Mr. Eufracio if his certification of revenues is complete and if the funds are in place. Mr. Eufracio commented that he certifies revenues in the summer before they begin the budget process. The next time he certifies revenues will be in August, because the certification of revenues is only done once a year.
Commissioner Palacios questioned if Mr. Eufracio had been the one who certified the estimated fund balance for December 31, 2016 in the amount of $20, 744,074
Sergio Cruz notified to the commissioner that Mr. Eufracio was the one who certified the $25,474,432 beginning fund balance. This certification was done in September 2015, during the budget process. Furthermore according to Mr. Cruz the amount of $184,606,361 was estimated by the county auditor’s office for preparation of the 2016 budget, giving them an available resource of $210,080,793
On account of that and base on the budget adoption, and based on deferring the law enforcement and other adjustments to midyear the total adopted budget for 2016 was $189,336,719 leaving them with a fund balance of $20,744,074 giving them a percentage of 10.95%
Judge Garcia asked if the percentage could run the risk of coming down, if they approve the salary increases in January. Mr. Cruz clarified to the judge that this number would not come down, because any adjustments they make for this fiscal year budget would have to be done within the 2016 budget. They cannot go back and take $1.3 million dollars from the fund balance to make these types of adjustments. The money would have to be extracted from the $189,336,719 budget, for a total of $1,170,830 increase for the law enforcement and then another $202, 000 for other departments that requested adjustments. This would allow for a total cost of $1,372,830 if implemented by January 11, 2016.
Mr. Eufracio clarified to the court that the $25,474,432 is not a certification but rather an estimate of the evaluation of resources. Hence, his estimate of revenues of $184, 606, 793
Commissioner Cantu questioned the consequences it would bring to the 10.95% if they were to move forward with the $1,372,830 cost to implement. Mr. Cruz assured him that this would not affect the 10.95% because it would have to be done from the current adopted budget of $189,336,719 if funded right now they could use the projected lapses. The projected lapses are normally used due to vacancies or other matters that leave lapses. For the last 2 years they have had lapses of about $2.7 million annually.
Sheriff Guerra added to this discussion commenting that under the jail department they have had lapses of about $1.3 million and in the law enforcement they had about $679,000 if combine they total roughly about $2 million dollars in lapses for the year 2015. Mr. Eufracio indicated that these type of lapses are usually used by the budget office for other things that might come up throughout the year.
Mr. Cruz suggested to the court to consider other issues that could affect the budget for 2016 for instance, the Juvenile Boot Camp, the Juvenile Residential Placements, the Jail Room and Board and the Indigent Defense Grant. Mr. Cruz stated that since the Juvenile Boot Camp has not been producing the same revenues as before, they are expecting to inject about $400,000 into the facility. For the Juvenile Residential Placements they budgeted about $2.5 million dollars for 2016, however last year they spent about $4 million and are more likely on track to do the same this year. Under the Jail Room and Board they budgeted about $2.2 million for the 2016 budget but have seen the numbers come down.
Commissioners Cuellar and Flores commented that if they were to approve it for April 1, 2016 the second quarter they could potential save about $700 to $800 thousand dollars. Before making any decision Mr. Eufracio commented that he had not seen the 10.95% before and therefore needs to take time to look into it. On that note, Commissioner Flores suggested tabling the action until next meeting.
Commissioner Cuellar indicated that under his precinct they equally level off employees at $28,000 he still has 17 employees in the parks and sanitation departments that are included in the general fund. Mr. Valde Guerra commented to the commissioner that this is in regards to the law enforcement. Nonetheless, the commissioner stated that he just wanted to address the issue because it will affect other employees as well. He commented to Judge Garcia that there’s a total amount of $53,579 for the sanitation and parks departments. Once more Mr. Guerra commented that he thought these figures were only for the law enforcement. Commissioner Cuellar indicated that the $1,170,830 is for the law enforcement however, the $202,000 is for other departments. Resultantly, Mr. Cruz mentioned that some departments have already been taken care of and precinct 1 falls under the $202,000
Under the circumstances Judge Garcia expressed feeling comfortable approving the budget for the workers at the low end of the scale for precinct 1, ratifying that these employees ought to be earning the same as those in other precincts. Beyond that, he suggested waiting until late March or early April to have a better understanding of the numbers. In respect to this suggestion, Mr. Eufracio said he would take the time to look at the numbers and come back later.
Finally, Judge Garcia suggested taking action on the equalization of salaries for the sanitation and parks employees under precinct 1.
Mr. Raul Silguero made clarifications in regards to the comments of when the full pay period is. He stated that the full pay period in 2016 is period 1, being the pay date of January 8, 2016. However, the way the language is written it may appear that the employee’s salary increases including the COLA, would be effective January 11, 2016 but the employees would not be receiving the raise until sometime in February. Hence, the full pay period should be interpreted as the full pay period of the year which does not include January 1, 2016 but the second one would. All in all, Mr. Silguero suggested having the action be read as of January 1, 2016 to include the COLA as well.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval to approve salary adjustments for the Sanitation and Parks under Precinct 1, effective as of January 1, 2016 to include the COLA.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
Commissioner Flores reminded Mr. Eufracio to come back next meeting to further discuss the figures.
Mr. Valde Guerra repeated the amount of $53, 579 budgeted for precinct 1, parks and sanitation. With the total net that it might be, plus the COLA.
Before moving on, Judge Garcia requested for Sheriff Guerra to please understand their position, adding that they are fully appreciate of the work the sheriff's do. He also assured Sheriff Guerra that they will be working to compensate them fairly.
Sheriff Guerra assured Judge Garcia that they are willing to work with them and understand their difficult position. However he reminded the court that on the jail side, the DA's, the JP's together with the Sheriff's Office they have done a fantastic job of reducing the out of county inmate population. Last year they spent $2.2 million and feel they will be able to safe about $1 million for this year.
Commissioner Cantu added that they are always going to be dealing with moving targets when it comes to budget, sweep and estimates. Therefore is always good to look at past history.
Court proceeded to Item.4
Attachments:
B.
AI-52801
Title IV-E Child Welfare Services (1100):
1. Approval of the revised Title IV-E Child Welfare Services Grant Budget (Contract #23941009) for October 1, 2015 - September 30, 2016.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 2, EDUARDO “EDDIE” CANTU the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
2. Approval for County Judge to sign required documents.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 2, EDUARDO “EDDIE” CANTU, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 -Unanimously
1. Approval of the revised Title IV-E Child Welfare Services Grant Budget (Contract #23941009) for October 1, 2015 - September 30, 2016.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 2, EDUARDO “EDDIE” CANTU the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
2. Approval for County Judge to sign required documents.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 2, EDUARDO “EDDIE” CANTU, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 -Unanimously
C.
AI-52746
Salary Schedule - Various Departments:
1. Approval to correct salary schedule discrepancies adopted during the budget process as listed in Exhibit A, effective first full pay period of 2016.
Mr. Cruz stated this would not affect the fund balance, and there is a $4,000 increase to Road & Bridge.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 2, EDUARDO “EDDIE” CANTU, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 -Unanimously
2. Approval of transfer(s).
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 2, EDUARDO “EDDIE” CANTU the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 2, EDUARDO “EDDIE” CANTU the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval to rescind action on Item.22.C.2.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
3. Approval to revise the salary schedule in accordance with Commissioners Court action.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 2, EDUARDO “EDDIE” CANTU the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
1. Approval to correct salary schedule discrepancies adopted during the budget process as listed in Exhibit A, effective first full pay period of 2016.
Mr. Cruz stated this would not affect the fund balance, and there is a $4,000 increase to Road & Bridge.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 2, EDUARDO “EDDIE” CANTU, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 -Unanimously
2. Approval of transfer(s).
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 2, EDUARDO “EDDIE” CANTU the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 2, EDUARDO “EDDIE” CANTU the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval to rescind action on Item.22.C.2.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
3. Approval to revise the salary schedule in accordance with Commissioners Court action.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 2, EDUARDO “EDDIE” CANTU the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
Attachments:
23.
Purchasing Department:
Notes:
A. FOR ANY CONTRACT(S) AWARDED AND APPROVED UNDER THIS AGENDA, EXECUTED COPIES OF THE CONTRACT(S) WILL BE AVAILABLE ON THE COUNTY INTRA-NET WEBSITE AND WILL BE FOWARDED VIA E-MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERED TO HIDALGO COUNTY AUDITOR'S OFFICE.
B. ANY AND ALL REQUESTS FOR PAYMENT(S) APPROVED WILL BE SUBJECT TO COUNTY AUDITORS PROCESSING PROCEDURES INCLUDING AUTHORITY FOR COUNTY TREASURER TO ISSUE PAYMENT(S)/CHECK(S).
Notes:
A. FOR ANY CONTRACT(S) AWARDED AND APPROVED UNDER THIS AGENDA, EXECUTED COPIES OF THE CONTRACT(S) WILL BE AVAILABLE ON THE COUNTY INTRA-NET WEBSITE AND WILL BE FOWARDED VIA E-MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERED TO HIDALGO COUNTY AUDITOR'S OFFICE.
B. ANY AND ALL REQUESTS FOR PAYMENT(S) APPROVED WILL BE SUBJECT TO COUNTY AUDITORS PROCESSING PROCEDURES INCLUDING AUTHORITY FOR COUNTY TREASURER TO ISSUE PAYMENT(S)/CHECK(S).
A.
Hidalgo County
1.
AI-52714
a. Presentation of scoring grid for the purpose of ranking by Commissioners' Court, the Statement of Qualification responses received in connection with the Request for Qualifications for: "Professional Auditing Services" - RFQ-2015-328-12-02;
| COMPANY | AVERAGE SCORE |
RANKED |
| Patillo, Brown & Hill | 93.14 | 3 |
| Burton, McCumber & Cortex | 96.57 | 1 |
| Long Chilton, LLP | 93.86 | 2 |
| Belt Harris Pechacek, LLLP | 91.43 | 4 |
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
b. Authority for Purchasing Department to commence negotiations with the number one ranked participant/firm of Burton, McCumber & Cortex in order to finalize an engagement/contract for the provision of professional independent audit services for Hidalgo County including all applicable agencies and/or programs.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 2, EDUARDO “EDDIE” CANTU the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
Attachments:
2.
AI-52724
a. Requesting exemption from competitive procurement requirements pursuant to Texas Local Government Code, 262-024 (a)(7); an item that can only be obtained from only one source;
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 – Unanimously
b. Approval of a "Sole Source Declaration" for "R Communications" for the Service of "Broadcasting of Commissioners' Court Meetings" with said service to remain in effect unless revoked by Hidalgo County Commissioner's Court or terminated as provided under page four (4) of contract section sixteen (16).
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 – Unanimously
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 – Unanimously
b. Approval of a "Sole Source Declaration" for "R Communications" for the Service of "Broadcasting of Commissioners' Court Meetings" with said service to remain in effect unless revoked by Hidalgo County Commissioner's Court or terminated as provided under page four (4) of contract section sixteen (16).
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 – Unanimously
Attachments:
3.
AI-52751
Presentation of "sealed quotes" received for the purpose of award and approval of contract document to the responsible vendor submitting the lowest and best quote [while meeting all specifications and/or requirements as attached hereto] for: Hidalgo County: "Healthcare Reform Employee Tracking Consultant" for RFSQ #2016-026-12-30-YZV.
Ms. Salazar recommended Eligibility Tracking Calculators.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 – Unanimously
Ms. Salazar recommended Eligibility Tracking Calculators.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 – Unanimously
4.
AI-52621
Presentation of sole responsible vendor submitting the lowest and best bid meeting all specifications and/or requirements for the purpose of award and approval of contract for Request for Bids titled: Hidalgo County - "Turnkey Burial Services (Including Cemetery Plots) for Unidentified Pauper Remains" through project No.: 2016-009-12-02-HGO.
Ms. Salazar recommended Mid Valley Cemetery Incorporated, DBA. Val Verde Memorial Gardens.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 – Unanimously
Ms. Salazar recommended Mid Valley Cemetery Incorporated, DBA. Val Verde Memorial Gardens.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 – Unanimously
Attachments:
B.
Pct. 1
1.
AI-52799
Authority to advertise with approval of RFB plans and specifications developed by project engineer, SAMES, Inc., for two Hidalgo County Precinct No. 1 Projects, including the re-advertising of projects in the event no Bid responses are received and/or are rejected and project is still required for:
1) "Paving & Drainage Improvements to: Mile 4W (10N - 12N)" RFB No. 2016-027-01-27-MSS.
2) "Paving & Drainage Improvements to: Mile 12N (FM1015 - 2W)" RFB No. 2016-028-01-27-MSS.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval on 1 and 2.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
2) "Paving & Drainage Improvements to: Mile 12N (FM1015 - 2W)" RFB No. 2016-028-01-27-MSS.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval on 1 and 2.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
Attachments:
C.
Pct. 2
1.
AI-52794
Pursuant to current contract with L&G Engineering (Article 14), a request for approval by engineer to permit the subcontracting of R.O.W. Surveying Services, LLC. in connection with Work Authorization No. 3 for the Pct 2 Regional Linear Park Project.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
Attachments:
2.
AI-52708
Acceptance and approval of request to purchase a "subsite with the annual hosting and support for the subsite" and a "custom mobile app with setup and annual fee" including any future hardware, software, maintenance, technical support, updates, upgrades, licenses, automatic renewals and any other pertinent related services with CivicPlus [County's sole source vendor for the County's Official Website amid sole source declaration] for said purchase thru assigned requistion #288959 as follow with authority for County Judge or Designee to execute said agreements:
Subsite setup Fee: $6,425.00
Subsite annual fee for hosting and support: $1,575.00
Custom Mobile App setup fee: $5,500.00
Custom Mobile App annual fee: $1,950.00
TOTAL AMOUNT: $15,450.00
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
Attachments:
D.
Pct. 3
1.
AI-52747
Discussion and applicable action in connection with the current contract between Hidalgo County and Pro-Medic, LLC including
but not limited to the following options:
A. Permit the current agreement with Pro-Medic to expire on 02-18-16 while due process in exercised by State of Texas Dept. of Health; OR,
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval on Item.23.D.1.A.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
Ms. Salazar announced that there would no lapses in between services.
B. Pursuant to notification to Precinct #3 from State of Texas Department of Health [see attachment herein] and Articles 6 & 16 of the current agreement between Hidalgo County and Pro-Medic EMS, LLC action to send notice of termination due to the circumstances described in attachments effective upon execution of new contract to be awarded herein;
No action taken on this item.
but not limited to the following options:
A. Permit the current agreement with Pro-Medic to expire on 02-18-16 while due process in exercised by State of Texas Dept. of Health; OR,
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval on Item.23.D.1.A.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
Ms. Salazar announced that there would no lapses in between services.
B. Pursuant to notification to Precinct #3 from State of Texas Department of Health [see attachment herein] and Articles 6 & 16 of the current agreement between Hidalgo County and Pro-Medic EMS, LLC action to send notice of termination due to the circumstances described in attachments effective upon execution of new contract to be awarded herein;
No action taken on this item.
C. Presentation of scoring grid [for the purposes of ranking and award of contract] of the proposals received for: Emergency Ambulance Services for those Unincorporated Areas in Pct 3 and as further described and detailed in the specifications in the approved HC RFP;
| Evaluators | PROMEDIC EMS LLC |
MED-CARE
EMS
|
HIDALGO COUNTY
EMS
|
| Evaluator 1 | 90 | 66 | 91 |
| Evaluator 2 | 93 | 82 | 96 |
| Evaluator 3 | 93 | 80 | 94 |
| Evaluator 4 | 93 | 82 | 98 |
| TOTAL | 369 | 310 | 379 |
| AVERAGE | 92.25 | 77.50 | 94.75 |
| CC Ranking | 2 | 3 | 1 |
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 2, EDUARDO “EDDIE” CANTU, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 -Unanimously
D. Authority to negotiate a final “Emergency Ambulance Services for Unincorporated Areas in Pct 3” Agreement with the number one ranked firm of Hidalgo County EMS.
Ms. Salazar commented that this is to become effective upon the expiration of the current agreement.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
E.
Pct. 4
1.
AI-52726
A. Requesting exemption from competitive bidding requirements under the Texas Local Government Code, Section 262.024 (A) (4) for a professional service;
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 – Unanimously
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 – Unanimously
B. Presentation of the scoring grid (for the purposes of ranking by CC) the firms graded & evaluated through the County’s approved “pool” of Engineering Firms for the provision of "professional engineering services" for Project: FM 1925 (from 1,500 ft. West of FM 2220 (Ware Road) to 10th Street located within Hidalgo County Precinct 4;
ENGINEERING FIRMS:
ENGINEERING FIRMS:
| Totals | Building Transportation Infrastructure, Inc. d/b/a BTI |
DBR Engineering Consultants, Inc. | L&G Engineering |
| Scores | 95 | 94 | 97 |
| Ranking | 2 | 3 | 1 |
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
C. Authority for the Purchasing Department to negotiate a professional engineering services agreement for Project: FM 1925 (from 10th Street to McColl Road) located within Hidalgo County Precinct 4, commencing with the No.1 ranked firm L & G Engineering for Engineering Services.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
D. Requesting exemption from competitive bidding requirements under the Texas Local Government Code, Section 262.024 (A) (4) for a professional service;
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 – Unanimously
E. Presentation of the scoring grid (for the purposes of ranking by CC) the firms graded & evaluated through the County’s approved “pool” of Engineering Firms for the provision of "professional engineering services" for Project: Mile 5 from Taylor Road to FM 2220 (Ware Road) located within Hidalgo County Precinct 4;
ENGINEERING FIRMS:
| Totals | Building Transportation Infrastructure, Inc. d/b/a BTI |
DBR Engineering Consultants, Inc. | L&G Engineering |
| Scores | 95 | 94 | 97 |
| Ranking | 2 | 3 | 1 |
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
F. Authority for the Purchasing Department to negotiate a professional engineering services agreement for Project: Mile 5 from Taylor Road to FM 2220 (Ware Road) located within Hidalgo County Precinct 4, commencing with the No.1 ranked firm L & G Engineering for Engineering Services.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
Attachments:
F.
Colonia Access Program Pct. 3
1.
AI-52698
Presentation for discussion, consideration, and action on a recommendation by project Javier Hinojosa Engineering to award to lowest bidder meeting all specifications: MJA Construction, LLC in the amount of $176,801.00 for Bid No. CAP-15-359-10-28-YSS “Road & Drainage Construction for Havana Lomas Subdivision No.4”
Commissioner Flores stepped away from the meeting.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 4 - 0 – Unanimously
Commissioner Flores stepped away from the meeting.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 4 - 0 – Unanimously
Attachments:
2.
AI-52709
Presentation for discussion, consideration, and action on a recommendation by project Javier Hinojosa Engineering to award to lowest bidder meeting all specifications: 2GS, LLC in the amount of $78,125.50 for Bid No. CAP-15-360-10-28-YSS “Road & Drainage Construction for Havana Lomas Subdivision No.5”
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 4 - 0 – Unanimously
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 4 - 0 – Unanimously
Attachments:
G.
Sheriff's Office
1.
AI-52736
A. Acceptance and approval of termination notice submitted by current contracted vendor [NTC Drug Testing Services, Inc.] in connection to agreement# E-15-240-06-23 (C-13-077-06-25) for the purposes of: Drug Testing Collection Services (on as needed basis) for the Hidalgo County Sheriff's Office;
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 4 - 0 – Unanimously
B. Ratification of publication [by Martha L. Salazar, HC Purchasing Agent] to advertise [due to time constraints in order to avoid lapse in services] a Request for Bid titled: Hidalgo County Sheriff's Office-"Drug Testing Collection Services" through project No.: 2016-024A-01-04-SMA.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 2, EDUARDO “EDDIE” CANTU the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 4 - 0 - Unanimously
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 4 - 0 – Unanimously
B. Ratification of publication [by Martha L. Salazar, HC Purchasing Agent] to advertise [due to time constraints in order to avoid lapse in services] a Request for Bid titled: Hidalgo County Sheriff's Office-"Drug Testing Collection Services" through project No.: 2016-024A-01-04-SMA.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 2, EDUARDO “EDDIE” CANTU the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 4 - 0 - Unanimously
Attachments:
2.
AI-52756
Presentation of bids received for the purpose of awarding to the responsible vendors submitting lowest/best bids and meeting all specifications and/or requirements including the approval of contracts (subject to legal review) for Request for Bid titled: Hidalgo County Sheriff's Office-Drug Testing Collection Services" through project No." 2016-024A-01-04-SMA.
Ms. Salazar recommended and concurred with the Sheriff's recommendation of the Center for Industrial Rehab Services.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 4 - 0 – Unanimously
Ms. Salazar recommended and concurred with the Sheriff's recommendation of the Center for Industrial Rehab Services.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 4 - 0 – Unanimously
Attachments:
H.
Co. Wide
1.
AI-52729
a. Acceptance and approval of termination notice submitted by current contracted vendor [NTC Drug Testing Services, INc.] in connection to Contract (C-15-022-02-17) for the purposes of: "Drug & Alcohol Testing for H.C. Employees" (on an as needed basis) for Hidalgo County.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 2, EDUARDO “EDDIE” CANTU the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 4 - 0 - Unanimously
b. Ratification of publication [by HC Purchasing Agent, Martha L. Salazar due to time constraints & avoid laspse in servcices] to advertise a Request for Bid titled: Hidalgo County- Drug & Alcohol Testing for H.C. Employees" through project No. 2016-024-01-04-YZV and utilizing the previously HCCC approved procurement packet for same.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 4 - 0 – Unanimously
c. Presentation of bid(s) received for the purpose of award and approval of contract document to the responsible vendor submitting the lowest and best bid [and meeting all specifications and/or requirements ] as attached hereto for: Hidalgo County-Drug & Alcohol Testing for H.C. Employees" RFB 2016-024-01-04-YZV.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 2, EDUARDO “EDDIE” CANTU the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval subject to final legal approval of document and all award accord insurances.
Vote: 4 - 0 - Unanimously
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 2, EDUARDO “EDDIE” CANTU the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 4 - 0 - Unanimously
b. Ratification of publication [by HC Purchasing Agent, Martha L. Salazar due to time constraints & avoid laspse in servcices] to advertise a Request for Bid titled: Hidalgo County- Drug & Alcohol Testing for H.C. Employees" through project No. 2016-024-01-04-YZV and utilizing the previously HCCC approved procurement packet for same.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 4 - 0 – Unanimously
c. Presentation of bid(s) received for the purpose of award and approval of contract document to the responsible vendor submitting the lowest and best bid [and meeting all specifications and/or requirements ] as attached hereto for: Hidalgo County-Drug & Alcohol Testing for H.C. Employees" RFB 2016-024-01-04-YZV.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 2, EDUARDO “EDDIE” CANTU the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval subject to final legal approval of document and all award accord insurances.
Vote: 4 - 0 - Unanimously
24.
Closed Session:
Commissioners' Court may go into Closed Session pursuant to Chapter 551, Texas Government Code, Sections 551.071 & 551.072 to discuss the following:
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 4 - 0 - Unanimously
Commissioners' Court may go into Closed Session pursuant to Chapter 551, Texas Government Code, Sections 551.071 & 551.072 to discuss the following:
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 4 - 0 - Unanimously
A.
Real Estate Acquisition
No action taken on this item.
No action taken on this item.
B.
Pending and/or potential litigation
No action taken on this item.
No action taken on this item.
C.
AI-52716
C-5144-15-A; Joel Casares and Debbie Casares v. County of Hidalgo
No action taken on this item.
No action taken on this item.
D.
AI-52752
Civil Action No. 15-CV-00477; Pedro Garcia, Jr. v. Hidalgo County, Texas, et al
E.
AI-52754
Civil Action No. 15-CV-435; Gregorio Trevino, Jr. v. Hidalgo County, Texas, et al
No action taken on this item.
No action taken on this item.
F.
AI-52775
Civil Action No. 7:14-CV-00201; Nita L. Labude, ind. and as personal rep. of the Estate of Paul William Labude (decendant) v. County of Hidalgo, et al
No action taken on this item.
No action taken on this item.
G.
AI-52812
Claim of R.Gutierrez Engineering Corporation
No action taken on this item.
No action taken on this item.
H.
AI-52761
Claim of Jose Sandoval Hernandez
No action taken on this item.
No action taken on this item.
I.
AI-52764
Claim of Pedro Bautista Perez
No action taken on this item.
No action taken on this item.
J.
AI-52766
Claim of Gabriela Ventura
No action taken on this item.
No action taken on this item.
K.
AI-52770
Claim of San Juanita Herrera
No action taken on this item.
No action taken on this item.
L.
AI-52782
Claim of Jose Escalante
No action taken on this item.
No action taken on this item.
M.
AI-52787
Claim of Alondra Marroquin
No action taken on this item.
No action taken on this item.
N.
AI-52789
Claim of Leonel Gutierrez
No action taken on this item.
No action taken on this item.
O.
AI-52791
Claim of Margarita Castaneda
No action taken on this item.
No action taken on this item.
25.
A. Requesting exemption from competitive bidding requirements under the Texas Local Government Code, Section 262.024(A) (4) "a Professional Service" for the "provision of legal services/representation in connection with litigation."
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 2, EDUARDO “EDDIE” CANTU, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval in connection to Item.26.C.
Vote: 5 - 0 – Unanimously
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval in connection to Item.26.D.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 2, EDUARDO “EDDIE” CANTU the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval in connection to Item.26.E.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 2, EDUARDO “EDDIE” CANTU, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval in connection to Item.26.G.
Vote: 5 - 0 – Unanimously
B. Requesting engagement with the firm of Atlas, Hall & Rodriguez/ Atlas, Hall & Rodriguez/Atlas, Hall & Rodriguez/ Atlas, Hall & Rodriguez for the "Provision of Legal Services/Representation in connection with Litigation" and authority to submit letter of engagement
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 2, EDUARDO “EDDIE” CANTU the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval in connection with Item.26.C.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
Court proceeded back to Item.26.D.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 2, EDUARDO “EDDIE” CANTU the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval in connection to Item.26.D
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
Court proceeded to Item.26.E.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 2, EDUARDO “EDDIE” CANTU, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval in connection to Item.26.E.
Vote: 5 - 0 – Unanimously
Court proceeded to Item.26.F.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 2, EDUARDO “EDDIE” CANTU the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval in connection to Item.26.G.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
Court proceeded to Item.26.H.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 2, EDUARDO “EDDIE” CANTU, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval in connection to Item.26.C.
Vote: 5 - 0 – Unanimously
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval in connection to Item.26.D.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 2, EDUARDO “EDDIE” CANTU the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval in connection to Item.26.E.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 2, EDUARDO “EDDIE” CANTU, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval in connection to Item.26.G.
Vote: 5 - 0 – Unanimously
B. Requesting engagement with the firm of Atlas, Hall & Rodriguez/ Atlas, Hall & Rodriguez/Atlas, Hall & Rodriguez/ Atlas, Hall & Rodriguez for the "Provision of Legal Services/Representation in connection with Litigation" and authority to submit letter of engagement
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 2, EDUARDO “EDDIE” CANTU the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval in connection with Item.26.C.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
Court proceeded back to Item.26.D.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 2, EDUARDO “EDDIE” CANTU the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval in connection to Item.26.D
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
Court proceeded to Item.26.E.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 2, EDUARDO “EDDIE” CANTU, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval in connection to Item.26.E.
Vote: 5 - 0 – Unanimously
Court proceeded to Item.26.F.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 2, EDUARDO “EDDIE” CANTU the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval in connection to Item.26.G.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
Court proceeded to Item.26.H.
26.
Open Session:
Commissioner Flores joined the meeting.
Commissioner Flores joined the meeting.
A.
Real Estate Acquisition and appropriation for same
No action taken on this item.
No action taken on this item.
B.
Pending and/or potential litigation
No action taken on this item.
No action taken on this item.
C.
AI-52717
C-5144-15-A; Joel Casares and Debbie Casares v. County of Hidalgo
Refer back to Item.25.A.& B.
Refer back to Item.25.A.& B.
D.
AI-52753
Civil Action No. 15-CV-00477; Pedro Garcia, Jr. v. Hidalgo County, Texas, et al
Refer back to Item.25.A.& B.
Refer back to Item.25.A.& B.
E.
AI-52755
Civil Action No. 15-CV-435; Gregorio Trevino, Jr. v. Hidalgo County, Texas, et al
Refer back to Item.25.A.& B.
Refer back to Item.25.A.& B.
F.
AI-52776
Civil Action No. 7:14-CV-00201; Nita L. Labude, ind. and as personal rep. of the Estate of Paul William Labude (decendant) v. County of Hidalgo, et al
Mr. Guerra requested to accept settlement of this case by the county's insurance carrier.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
Mr. Guerra requested to accept settlement of this case by the county's insurance carrier.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
G.
AI-52813
Claim of R.Gutierrez Engineering Corporation
Refer back to Item.25.A & B.
Refer back to Item.25.A & B.
H.
AI-52763
Claim of Jose Sandoval Hernandez
Mr. Guerra requested for settlement authority to make an offer in the amount of $1,368.90
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 2, EDUARDO “EDDIE” CANTU the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
The amount is to cover property damage.
Mr. Guerra requested for settlement authority to make an offer in the amount of $1,368.90
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 2, EDUARDO “EDDIE” CANTU the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
The amount is to cover property damage.
I.
AI-52765
Claim of Pedro Bautista Perez
Mr. Guerra requested for settlement authority to make an offer in the amount of $58.84
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
Mr. Guerra requested for settlement authority to make an offer in the amount of $58.84
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
J.
AI-52767
Claim of Gabriela Ventura
Mr. Guerra requested for settlement authority to make an offer in the amount of $12,500
If accepted the check will be payable to Gabriela Ventura and Almaraz Law Firm.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 2, EDUARDO “EDDIE” CANTU the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
Mr. Guerra requested for settlement authority to make an offer in the amount of $12,500
If accepted the check will be payable to Gabriela Ventura and Almaraz Law Firm.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 2, EDUARDO “EDDIE” CANTU the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
K.
AI-52771
Claim of San Juanita Herrera
Mr. Guerra requested for settlement authority to make an offer in the amount of $115.00
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 – Unanimously
Mr. Guerra requested for settlement authority to make an offer in the amount of $115.00
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 – Unanimously
L.
AI-52783
Claim of Jose Escalante
Mr. Guerra requested for settlement authority to make an offer in the amount of $3,000
If accepted the offer would be for bodily injures and property damages.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 2, EDUARDO “EDDIE” CANTU the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
Mr. Guerra requested for settlement authority to make an offer in the amount of $3,000
If accepted the offer would be for bodily injures and property damages.
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 2, EDUARDO “EDDIE” CANTU the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
M.
AI-52788
Claim of Alondra Marroquin
Mr. Guerra requested for settlement authority to make an offer in the amount of $50.00
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
Mr. Guerra requested for settlement authority to make an offer in the amount of $50.00
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 3, JOE M. FLORES, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
N.
AI-52790
Claim of Leonel Gutierrez
Mr. Guerra requested for settlement authority to make an offer in the amount of $1,045.55
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 2, EDUARDO “EDDIE” CANTU the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
Mr. Guerra requested for settlement authority to make an offer in the amount of $1,045.55
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 2, EDUARDO “EDDIE” CANTU the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
O.
AI-52792
Claim of Margarita Castaneda
Mr. Guerra requested for settlement authority to make an offer in the amount of $600.00
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 – Unanimously
Mr. Guerra requested for settlement authority to make an offer in the amount of $600.00
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 – Unanimously
27.
Closed Session:
Commissioners' Court may reconvene into Closed Session for the discussion regarding the agenda items listed
No action taken on this item.
Commissioners' Court may reconvene into Closed Session for the discussion regarding the agenda items listed
No action taken on this item.
28.
Open Session:
Commissioners' Court may reconvene into Open Session for the discussion regarding the agenda items listed
No action taken on this item.
Commissioners' Court may reconvene into Open Session for the discussion regarding the agenda items listed
No action taken on this item.
29.
Adjourn
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
On motion by COMMISSIONER PCT. 4, JOSEPH PALACIOS, seconded by COMMISSIONER PCT. 1, A.C. CUELLAR, JR., the Court made a UNANIMOUS vote of approval.
Vote: 5 - 0 - Unanimously
There being no further business to come before said
Court, the meetings of the Commissioners' Court and the
Drainage District #1 Board are now hereby adjourned.
Dated this the 5th day of JANUARY, 2016
ARTURO GUAJARDO, JR., County Clerk
Hidalgo County, Texas
By: ______________________________
Norma G. Cantu, Deputy
I, ARTURO GUAJARDO, JR., County Clerk attest that this is an accurate accounting of a proceeding of the Commissioners’ Court held on January 5, 2016.
Signed this 5th day of JANUARY 2016
ATTEST:
ARTURO GUAJARDO, JR.
County Clerk and Ex-Officio Clerk
Of the Commissioners’ Court of
Hidalgo County
By: ____________________________
(Seal) Norma G. Cantu, Deputy
Court, the meetings of the Commissioners' Court and the
Drainage District #1 Board are now hereby adjourned.
Dated this the 5th day of JANUARY, 2016
ARTURO GUAJARDO, JR., County Clerk
Hidalgo County, Texas
By: ______________________________
Norma G. Cantu, Deputy
I, ARTURO GUAJARDO, JR., County Clerk attest that this is an accurate accounting of a proceeding of the Commissioners’ Court held on January 5, 2016.
Signed this 5th day of JANUARY 2016
ATTEST:
ARTURO GUAJARDO, JR.
County Clerk and Ex-Officio Clerk
Of the Commissioners’ Court of
Hidalgo County
By: ____________________________
(Seal) Norma G. Cantu, Deputy
