 |
AGENDA ITEM REVIEW FORM |
2.F.
Work Session
- Meeting Date:
- 10/06/2021
- Department Head:
- Kay Macuil
- Submitted By:
- Kay Macuil, City Attorney, Attorney's Office
Action Requested:
Discussion Item - No Action to be Taken
ITEM:
Discussion and possible directions to staff on any and all matters regarding Resolution No. 2196. A resolution of the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Luis, Arizona, specifically ratifying salary adjustments previously approved in the budgets for the fiscal years ending June 30, 2020, 2021 and 2022; superseding conflicting provisions and providing for severability. (Monica Castro, Director of Finance)
SUMMARY:
This Resolution No. 2196 merely makes the record explicitly clear that City Council adopted salary adjustments for the fiscal years ending June 30, 2020, 2021 and 2022 as part of the budget process. Recently, staff reviewed the City Council's authorizations for implementing the salary plan over the years and discovered that the authorization was not specified after the fiscal year ending June 30, 2019.
On July 19, 2018, City Council passed Resolution No. 2051-A adopting a salary plan, which stated: "City Council plans to fund this Salary Plan incrementally every year over a period of four years." However, that resolution only formally adopted salary adjustments for the 2018-2019 fiscal year. At that time, it was not possible to budget for all four years since the revenue and expenditures must be analyzed yearly as to the dollar amount of each incremental salary adjustment.
On a related matter, Resolution No. 2196 also addresses the use of both the terms "calendar year" and "fiscal year" in the vacation buy-back program clarifying that the program is to be implemented on a fiscal-year basis.
On July 19, 2018, City Council passed Resolution No. 2051-A adopting a salary plan, which stated: "City Council plans to fund this Salary Plan incrementally every year over a period of four years." However, that resolution only formally adopted salary adjustments for the 2018-2019 fiscal year. At that time, it was not possible to budget for all four years since the revenue and expenditures must be analyzed yearly as to the dollar amount of each incremental salary adjustment.
On a related matter, Resolution No. 2196 also addresses the use of both the terms "calendar year" and "fiscal year" in the vacation buy-back program clarifying that the program is to be implemented on a fiscal-year basis.
RECOMMENDATION / SUGGESTED MOTION:
Discussion and possible directions to staff only, no action item.
Fiscal Impact
- IS THERE FISCAL IMPACT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ITEM:
- Yes
- CITY/STATE/FEDERAL FUNDS:
- City
- TOTAL:
- See fiscal impact stment
- BUDGETED AMOUNT:
- See fiscal impact stmt
- AVAILABLE AMOUNT TO TRANSFER:
- See fiscal impact statement
- ACCT NAME & GL#/REMAINING BALANCE BEFORE PURCHASE:
- See fiscal impact
FISCAL IMPACT STATEMENT (IF THIS IS A BUDGET TRANSFER, YOU MUST ATTACH THE BUDGET ADJUSTMENT FORM):
The above fiscal impact is for the current July 1, 2021, to June 30, 2021, fiscal year only. The prior fiscal year salary adjustments for the contracted employees were budgeted in the prior fiscal years and have no impact on this year.