 |
AGENDA ITEM REVIEW FORM |
10.A.
Regular City Council Meeting
- Meeting Date:
- 03/23/2016
- Department Head:
- Kay Macuil
- Submitted By:
- Kay Macuil, City Attorney, Attorney's Office
Action Requested:
Motion
ITEM:
Discussion and possible action to hold an Executive Session pursuant to A.R.S. §§38-431.03(A)(3) and 38-431.03(A)(4) on any and all matters relating to the City's litigation with Arizona Public Service (APS) and related contracts for discussion or consultation for legal advice with the City Attorney or the City's Attorneys and in order to consider the City's position and instruct its Attorneys regarding the City's position. (Kay Marion Macuil, City Attorney)
SUMMARY:
The law firm of Fennemore Craig, P.C. represents the City in litigation in pursuit of past taxes from APS. Council can be properly advised by holding an Executive Session for the purposes described in the agenda item.
RECOMMENDATION / SUGGESTED MOTION:
I MOVE TO HOLD AN EXECUTIVE SESSION PURSUANT TO A.R.S. §§38-431.03(A)(3) AND 38-431.03(A)(4).
Fiscal Impact
- IS THERE FISCAL IMPACT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ITEM:
- N/A
- CITY/STATE/FEDERAL FUNDS:
- N/A
- TOTAL:
- N/A
- BUDGETED:
- N/A
- AVAILABLE TO TRANSFER:
- N/A
- ACCOUNT #/REMAINING BALANCE:
- N/A
FISCAL IMPACT STATEMENT (IF THIS IS A BUDGET TRANSFER, YOU MUST ATTACH THE BUDGET ADJUSTMENT FORM):
Fiscal ipact is not applicable to this agenda item.