Skip to main content

AgendaQuick™

View Agenda Item

HEARING OFFICER
AGENDA ITEM REVIEW FORM
2.A.
Hearing Officer Agenda
Meeting Date:
11/01/2016
Submitted By:
Jose A. Guzman, Assistant Planner, Planning & Zoning Department

ITEM:

Discussion and possible action on any and all matters regarding Minor Variance Case No. 2016-0522. A request by Adela Perez Padilla, property owner, for a minor variance to reduce the required front yard setback from 20 feet to 16 feet to allow the construction of a block wall of 6 feet high. The property is located at 1977 E. Monreal Lane, San Luis, Arizona. 

SUMMARY:

The purpose of the minor variance procedure is to allow for up to a maximum twenty percent (20%) variation from a development standard or dimension requirement of the zoning code where a practical difficulty, unnecessary hardship, or a result inconsistent with the general purposes of the rezoning code would occur from its strict, and literal interpretation, and enforcement.

Located at Bienestar Estates No. 6 Subdivision, the lot has an area of 6200 sq. ft. The current lot is zoned as Medium-High Density Residential (R-2), Assessor’s Parcel Number 776-52-358. The property is developed as a residence. The applicant is requesting this variance to allow the construction of a block wall 6 feet high inside of the 20 feet front setback. This is to make space for a security gate to access the side patio of the house for a future construction of a pool.

AGENCY REVIEW:
City staff explained to the applicant the requirements and procedure of a minor variance. It was verified that the property-owner would be able to request a minor variance and that it would not need to go before the Board of Adjustments.

As part of the review process, all land use cases are reviewed by various City and outside agencies. We have received comments from the following agencies:
  1. City of San Luis Fire Department (10-18-16)
  2. City of San Luis Assistant City Attorney (10-18-16)
The City has not received any other significant concerns or objections from the various review agencies.

The Department of Development Services has reviewed the request and has the following comments:
  1. Provided on the City of San Luis Zoning Ordinance Chapter 6- Multiple Residence Zoning Districts- Table No. 5. The front setback required for R-2 Zoning District is 20 feet.  As per Section 14.9-A, in all districts a fence or wall or hedge may be erected or maintained at a height no greater than three feet six inches (3’6”) within the required front or street side setback. 
ANALYSIS:
A variance is not a right. It may be granted to an applicant only if the applicant establishes compliance with all of the hardship criteria established in A.R.S. §9-462.6 and in Section 3.5 (C) of the Zoning Ordinance.
Pursuant to State Statues, the Board may not:
  1. Make any changes in the uses permitted in any zoning classification or zoning district. 
  2. Grant a variance if the special circumstances applicable to the property are self-imposed by the property owner.
The Zoning Administrator or Hearing Officer, upon finding that the variance request does not exceed a twenty percent (20%) reduction or increase in a development standard or dimension required by this code and can determine that the request complies with the four (4) hardship criteria established in Sec 3.5 (C) of this Ordinance, may approve the minor variance.

In the event the Zoning Administrator or Hearing Officer approves, approves with conditions or denies an application for a minor variance filed pursuant these regulations any person may appeal that decision in writing, including any required appeal fee, within fifteen (15) days of the decision and request that the minor variance be placed on the agenda of the next regularly scheduled Board of Adjustment meeting.

In all cases, the review shall address all of the following hardship criteria:
  1. There exist special circumstances or conditions regarding the land or building referred to in the application, which do not apply to other properties in the zoning district.
Staff does not find that there are any special circumstances or conditions relating to this request. The reason for this request can be resolve by changing the location of the wall to comply with the required setback.  
  1. The above special circumstances or conditions are preexisting and are not created or self-imposed by the owner or applicant.
There are no special circumstances or conditions. The conditions for the request were created by the property owner and should be corrected through redesign of the wall location.
  1. The variance is necessary for the preservation of substantial property rights. Without a variance the property cannot be used for purposes otherwise allowed in the zoning district.
Staff does not find that the construction of this wall within the required setback is necessary to the preservation of substantial property rights. The owner can install the security door facing the street and respecting the required setback.
  1. The authorizing of the variance will not be materially detrimental to persons residing or working in the vicinity, to adjacent property, or to the neighborhood or the public welfare.
The location and height of the wall has the potential of blocking vision of vehicular movement including neighbors using their driveway.  As required by the Zoning Ordinance, written acknowledge from each adjacent property owner to the notification of the requested minor variance is necessary. City staff requested a total of three (3) signatures of adjacent property owners and received two (2) signatures, because one lot is vacant and the owner is unknown.

STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
The applicant has provided the information and materials necessary for review of the request and for staff to make a recommendation. 

Staff recommends DENIAL of Minor Variance Case No. 2016-522, a request by Adela Perez Padilla, property owner, for a minor variance to reduce the required front yard setback from 20 feet to 16 feet to allow the construction of a block wall of 6 feet high. The property is located at 1977 E. Monreal Lane, San Luis, Arizona. 

RECOMMENDED MOTION:

I MOVE TO DENY MINOR VARIANCE CASE NO. 2016-522

Attachments