PUBLIC HEARING: Consider Ordinance #20-09: Revisions to Section 117-349 related to Accessory Uses and Structures

The purpose of this case is for the Planning Commission to review proposed updates to the Accessory Uses section of the City's ordinances.  Proposed updates have been drafted by Staff based on experience in implementing the current ordinance and feedback provided to Staff by city residents applying for various permits related to accessory uses on their property.

Staff published the Notice of Public Hearing in the Anoka County UnionHerald.  This public hearing is not specific to a single address and as a result individual mailers regarding this public hearing have not been sent to individual residences.

Observations
City Staff have been tracking areas of the City's zoning ordinance which require review and consideration for updating.  One of those sections is the Accessory Uses portion of the zoning ordinance (Section 117-349).  This sections outlines standards for uses such as decks, sheds, pools, and driveways. Each year City Staff receive dozens of permits related to these types of property improvements and as a result the current ordinance has been thoroughly tested by both Staff and residents in its current form and Staff have identified a number of areas within the current ordinance that are recommended to be updated. The updates that are proposed are meant to reduce redundancies as well as react to common resident requests related to the ordinance itself.  Staff has attached the draft ordinance for review by the Planning Commission. Staff will walk through each of the proposed revisions with the Planning Commission and members of the public in attendance.

Proposed Revision Summary

• Relocation of language regarding pools.  Currently ordinance language related to pools is in three different locations within the ordinance.  Staff is proposing to condense that information under the accessory uses section 117-349.
• Removal of the requirement that property owners site accessory buildings in a location that would still allow for future re-subdivison of the property. 
• Revising the process for a resident to request a taller accessory building from a variance request to a conditional use permit.  A variance carries with it certain statutory requirements whereas a conditional use permit requirements are specific to the City.
• Removal of language related to accessory building architectural requirements if the building is in the front yard.  Staff has found requiring three of the four (minimum of three complimentary colors, minimum 35% brick on street facing side, one hundred percent vegetative screening agreement recorded against the property, and 10% window coverage on street facing and common property lines) to be unrealistic when administering the code. City staff have revised the code to buildings in the front yard requiring that the exterior material match the principal building which achieves the original intent of that part of the ordinance that is proposed to be deleted.
• Combining the accessory building size restricts table into a single table.  Currently there are two tables, one each for the R-1 Rural Developing and the R-1 MUSA, however both tables have the same information.  Staff is also seeking feedback from the planning commission to further revise the allowable square footage and number of buildings and has provided some research on neighboring communities ordinances on this matter.

Alternatives
Alternative 1: Provide staff with specific direction on revisions to the allowable square footage of accessory building space and number of accessory buildings and recommend that the City Council introduce Ordinance #20-09 revising City Code Section 117-349 related to Accessory Uses. Staff supports this alternative.

Alternative 2: Table Ordinance #20-09 for further revision by City Staff based on feedback and direction by the Planning Commission. Staff also supports this alternative with specific feedback from the Planning Commission for desired revisions to the draft ordinance.

Staff is handling this case as part of their regularly scheduled duties.

Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend that Ordinance #20-09 be introduced by the City Council.

Motion to recommend that the City Council introduce Ordinance #20-09 amending City Code section 117-349 related to Accessory Uses.