2.1.
CC Work Session
- Meeting Date:
- 08/13/2013
- By:
- Colleen Lasher, Administrative Services
Title:
Discussion Regarding the Economic Development Manager Recruitment
Background:
Staff met with Ms. Sharon Klumpp of Springsted, Inc. to discuss the the search process for the Economic Development Manager. The discussion included the following items: overview of the search process, the role of the Economic Development Manager, the focus of the position, immediate and long-term goals of the position, the desired experience and background of the next Economic Development Manager, and the recruitment strategies -- including wages.
Per Springsted, Inc. (an excerpt from the attached memo) "The City of Ramsey currently assigns the Economic Development Manager a pay range of $67,753 to $84,690. Based on our review of the position and the market, we believe that the City should increase the pay range to at least $90,000. We are recommending an 8% increase which would bring the range up to $73,173-$91,465. The midpoint of the recommended range is $82,319. Hiring expectations would be around the midpoint (slightly higher or lower) if warranted based on the candidate’s qualifications and experience."
Note: Springsted Inc.'s full memo is attached for your review.
Per Springsted, Inc. (an excerpt from the attached memo) "The City of Ramsey currently assigns the Economic Development Manager a pay range of $67,753 to $84,690. Based on our review of the position and the market, we believe that the City should increase the pay range to at least $90,000. We are recommending an 8% increase which would bring the range up to $73,173-$91,465. The midpoint of the recommended range is $82,319. Hiring expectations would be around the midpoint (slightly higher or lower) if warranted based on the candidate’s qualifications and experience."
Note: Springsted Inc.'s full memo is attached for your review.
Notification:
From an internal equity perspective, this range is in-line with the Police Captain and the Parks/Assistant PW Superintendent positions. The intent and goal will be to hire between step 1 and step 3 / or very near the mid-point range, based on qualifications and experience.
Observations/Alternatives:
Option #1: To increase the current 2013 pay scale by eight percent which would bring the range up to $73,173-$91,465.
Option #2: Do not increase the current 2013 pay scale, keeping it at $67,753 to $84,690.
Option #3 Direct staff to adjust the 2013 pay scale based on Council discussion.
Option #2: Do not increase the current 2013 pay scale, keeping it at $67,753 to $84,690.
Option #3 Direct staff to adjust the 2013 pay scale based on Council discussion.
Recommendation:
Staff recommends following Springsted's recommendation to raise the 2013 pay scale to $73,173-$91,465. Note: The 2014 wage scale would be adjusted upward by whatever amount the City Council approves for non-union employees in 2014.
Funding Source:
With an anticipated November 2013 hire date; the 2013 funding is well within the 2013 budget. The 2014 budget has not been adopted at this time; however, the funding for this position will be accounted for in the 2014 budget and is anticipated to be not more than $112,957 (wages, taxes, benefits). Funding for the ED Position is from the Economic & Development Authority (EDA) budget, the Housing & Redevelopment Authority (HRA) budget and Tax Increment Financing (TIF).
Council Action:
Approve Option 1, based upon discussion, to increase the wage scale by eight percent / $73,173-$91,465.
Attachments
Form Review
| Inbox | Reviewed By | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Kurt Ulrich | Jo Thieling | 08/07/2013 04:24 PM |
| Diana Lund | Diana Lund | 08/08/2013 10:10 AM |
- Form Started By:
- Colleen Lasher
- Started On:
- 08/07/2013 09:19 AM
- Final Approval Date:
- 08/08/2013