5.0.
Personnel Committee
- Meeting Date:
- 10/15/2013
- By:
- Colleen Lasher, Administrative Services
Title:
Discussion Regarding 2014 Non-union Wages and City Health Insurance Contributions
Purpose/Background:
The purpose of this case is to discuss non-union employee’ wages and health insurance benefits for 2014 – and to consider the comparison related to the City’s unionized employees. This case is a follow-up to discussions that occurred at the July 23, 2013 work-session, case # 2.01 “Overview of 2014 Budget Process.” The minutes reflect that Councilmember Tossey asked about the assumption of a 2.5% wage increase for non-union employees. Finance Director Lund stated this (the 2.5% wage adjustment) is preliminary for consideration by the Council (but the union contracts have been approved and need to stay in the budget). As a result, it was the consensus of the Council to refer this item to the Personnel Committee.
As background information, the City currently employs 68 employees, of which 65 employees are benefit eligible. Of the 65 benefit eligible employees, 24 are non-union and 44 are union. Again, this case is specific to the City’s 24 non-union employees and the 2014 budget; however, it is important to note that since the union contracts have been settled through 2014 the decisions made regarding the non-union group will have an impact on the City’s internal equity and compensation structure.
As of this writing, staff has data from about 18% of the reporting metro area cities that indicate an average non-union wage increase of 2.08% for 2014.
Note: The July 23, 2013 work-session minutes are attached; as well as a summary of the City's wages and health insurance. If additional pending data becomes available prior to the Personnel Committee meeting staff will be prepared to share that information.
As background information, the City currently employs 68 employees, of which 65 employees are benefit eligible. Of the 65 benefit eligible employees, 24 are non-union and 44 are union. Again, this case is specific to the City’s 24 non-union employees and the 2014 budget; however, it is important to note that since the union contracts have been settled through 2014 the decisions made regarding the non-union group will have an impact on the City’s internal equity and compensation structure.
As of this writing, staff has data from about 18% of the reporting metro area cities that indicate an average non-union wage increase of 2.08% for 2014.
Note: The July 23, 2013 work-session minutes are attached; as well as a summary of the City's wages and health insurance. If additional pending data becomes available prior to the Personnel Committee meeting staff will be prepared to share that information.
Notification:
2014 Settled Contracts -- Related to Wages and Health Insurance:
The City’s three unions’ (AFSCME, LELS-Patrol, & LELS-Sergeants) labor agreements were settled as follows:
2014 Wages:
LELS Patrol and Sergeants will receive a 2% increase to the 2013 wage schedule, effective on 01-01-14 for Cost of Living Adjustment and 2% increase effective on 07-01-14, for a Market Rate Adjustment.
AFSCME will receive a 2% increase to the 2013 wage schedule, effective on 01-01-14 for Cost of Living Adjustment and 1% increase effective on 07-01-14, for a Market Rate Adjustment.
2014 Health Insurance:
Unionized employees will receive the following increase of the employer (the City) contribution over 2013, as follows:
From $1293 to $1358 Family
From $1095 to $1150 Employee/Children
From $1017 to $1068 Employee/Spouse
From $730-746.50 to $767–784 Single
Or to provide cash in lieu of City’s insurance contribution of $295 per month.
All three labor agreements included the following language: “*In the event that the 2014 health insurance renewal comes in at a rate increase of greater than 10%; as may be the case due the Health Care Reform Act, at the request of the bargaining unit, there will be a re-opener to negotiate the City’s contributions. In any case, the City will contribute no less than the 2014 amounts listed above.”
The renewal came in at 13.3% due to additional healthcare reform taxes. Therefore, it is entirely possible that the unions will request a re-opener to discuss the 2014 contributions.
The City’s three unions’ (AFSCME, LELS-Patrol, & LELS-Sergeants) labor agreements were settled as follows:
2014 Wages:
LELS Patrol and Sergeants will receive a 2% increase to the 2013 wage schedule, effective on 01-01-14 for Cost of Living Adjustment and 2% increase effective on 07-01-14, for a Market Rate Adjustment.
AFSCME will receive a 2% increase to the 2013 wage schedule, effective on 01-01-14 for Cost of Living Adjustment and 1% increase effective on 07-01-14, for a Market Rate Adjustment.
2014 Health Insurance:
Unionized employees will receive the following increase of the employer (the City) contribution over 2013, as follows:
From $1293 to $1358 Family
From $1095 to $1150 Employee/Children
From $1017 to $1068 Employee/Spouse
From $730-746.50 to $767–784 Single
Or to provide cash in lieu of City’s insurance contribution of $295 per month.
All three labor agreements included the following language: “*In the event that the 2014 health insurance renewal comes in at a rate increase of greater than 10%; as may be the case due the Health Care Reform Act, at the request of the bargaining unit, there will be a re-opener to negotiate the City’s contributions. In any case, the City will contribute no less than the 2014 amounts listed above.”
The renewal came in at 13.3% due to additional healthcare reform taxes. Therefore, it is entirely possible that the unions will request a re-opener to discuss the 2014 contributions.
Observations/Alternatives:
Although this case is for discussion only. The Personnel Committee may want to come to a consensus based on the following options:
Option #1: Retain the previously budgeted 2.5% increase in order to have flexibility based on the results of further analysis and receipt of additional pending data and to offer the same health insurance benefit to the non-union group as the unionized groups.
Option #2: Option #1, plus direct staff to perform a League of Minnesota Cities wage study for each non-union position in order to gather position specific market data and then use the remaining 1/2% to increase the position(s) that are too low.
Option#3: Based on discussion.
Comment: In 2012, all staff members, except Department Heads, received a 2% increase -- Department Heads received a 1% increase. This caused an even greater disparity within the compensation structure and the market.
Option #1: Retain the previously budgeted 2.5% increase in order to have flexibility based on the results of further analysis and receipt of additional pending data and to offer the same health insurance benefit to the non-union group as the unionized groups.
Option #2: Option #1, plus direct staff to perform a League of Minnesota Cities wage study for each non-union position in order to gather position specific market data and then use the remaining 1/2% to increase the position(s) that are too low.
Option#3: Based on discussion.
Comment: In 2012, all staff members, except Department Heads, received a 2% increase -- Department Heads received a 1% increase. This caused an even greater disparity within the compensation structure and the market.
Funding Source:
The preliminary 2014 budget has accounted for a 2.5% non-union COLA and the health insurance increases. Note: The difference between a 2% increase and a 2.5% increase is about $6000 per year. .
Recommendation:
Staffs' recommendation for the 2014 non-union wages is to retain the previously budgeted 2.5% increase in order to have flexibility based on the results of further analyses and receipt of additional pending data.
Staffs' recommendation for the 2014 non-union health insurance is to provide the same benefit as the unionized groups.
Staffs' recommendation for the 2014 non-union health insurance is to provide the same benefit as the unionized groups.
Action:
Not applicable at this time - discussion only.
Attachments
Form Review
| Inbox | Reviewed By | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Kurt Ulrich | Kurt Ulrich | 10/10/2013 04:10 PM |
- Form Started By:
- Colleen Lasher
- Started On:
- 10/10/2013 12:21 PM
- Final Approval Date:
- 10/10/2013