- Meeting Date:
- 04/09/2015
- Submitted For:
- Tim Gladhill
- By:
- Tina Goodroad, Community Development
Information
Title:
Purpose/Background:
Fire Station No. 2 currently operates from the existing building on the site. The Final Plat will be proposed in two phases to allow the Fire Department to be located at 5650 Alpine Drive, adjacent to the site until the construction of the new Fire Station 2 is completed.
Notification:
Observations/Alternatives:
The proposed Preliminary Plat does not include access to Nowthen Boulevard at the direction of the City Council. The details of this discussion are included in the attached copy of the City Council Work Session Minutes dated February 24, 2015. The current layout would allow for a future connection to Nowthen Boulevard, if desired in the future after further study of Nowthen Boulevard safety and mobility issues. The site will have three (3) access points to major roads: Nowthen Boulevard (at 150th Lane); Alpine Drive (at Helium Street); and Trunk Highway 47/Saint Francis Boulevard (at 152nd Avenue).
Landscaping and reforestation has been reviewed by staff and determined to meet the intent of the ordinance. A combination of trees are proposed on each residential lot satisfying the two (2) trees per lot requirement. Additional plantings are proposed in areas to buffer the proposed development from adjacent developments and from Nowthen Boulevard.
Staff is seeking policy direction on the number of sidewalks in the development. City Code would require sidewalks on one (1) side of each public street. The adjacent development known as MEADOW includes sidewalks on both sides of the streets. There will be some minor transitional issues if sidewalks are only included on one (1) side of the street. Additional details are included in the attached Staff Review File. A ten (10) foot wide bituminous trail is required connecting the internal loop street to Nowthen Boulevard at the location of the existing driveway.
The development agreement will require that all proposed homes meet all the architectural requirements of the underlying R-1, Residential (MUSA) District. No enhanced architectural standards are being required by the City.
Plans will need to be revised prior to review by the City Council. Required revisions are outlined in the attached Staff Review File.
Alternatives
Alternative #1: Recommend approval of the request with revisions as outlined in the Staff Review File. With the requested revisions, the proposal appears to comply with required City standards. Staff recommends this alternative.
Alternative #2: Recommend approval of the request as presented. There are some required revisions and omissions from the plans that are required in order to comply with City regulations. Staff does not recommend this option.
Alternative #3: Recommend denial of the request. The proposed development has gone through significant policy discussion. The general land use is in line with City goals. Required revisions are relatively minor. Staff does not recommend denial of the request.
Funding Source:
Recommendation:
The Environmental Policy Board reviewed the Landscape Plan and recommended approval of said plan with suggested revisions as outlined in the Staff Review File.
Action:
Attachments
- Site Location Map
- REVISED Plan Sheet
- Full Plan Set to be Revised
- Staff Review File
- City Council Work Session Minutes dated February 24, 2015
- DRAFT Environmental Policy Board Minutes dated March 30, 2015
- Resolution #15-04-092
Form Review
| Inbox | Reviewed By | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Brian Hagen | Tim Gladhill | 04/03/2015 11:58 AM |
| Chris Anderson | Chris Anderson | 04/03/2015 12:05 PM |
| Brian Hagen | Tim Gladhill | 04/03/2015 12:09 PM |
- Form Started By:
- Tina Goodroad
- Started On:
- 03/27/2015 10:16 AM
- Final Approval Date:
- 04/03/2015