Arterial Infrastructure to Serve Ramsey's Future Business Park & Capstone Homes Development

PURPOSE
Introduce the attached Capstone Homes proposal for funding and constructing arterial infrastructure improvements located on Bunker Lake Boulevard and Puma Street adjacent to the City's new business park.  The purpose of this case is to allow the Council to identify any information missing from this case needed to formally process/ respond to the request from Capstone Homes in April, and this is not a request to make a final/ formal decision RE the Capstone Proposal.  This case will come back to the Council in April for formal direction.

Staff welcomes questions, suggestions, and preliminary feedback. 


BACKGROUND & ALTERNATIVES
Please see attached documents.


GUESTS
Staff anticipates the following guests to be in attendance of this meeting/ case: Steve Bona of Capstone Homes, Al Pearson of Pearson Farms, John Dobbs the Pearson Farms Broker, Jason Aarsvold of Ehlers, Michael Altimari of Hageman Holdings, and Matt Kuker of PSD.  These guests will be available to answer questions and provide additional background information if needed.

NA

Please see attached "alternatives" document.
 

TBD

↵The EDA reviewed this case on 03/09.  Attached are draft EDA minutes. Below is a summary of preliminary EDA feedback:

• The EDA is generally open to considering the option of using EDA dollars for funding this project, if the Council so desires.
• The EDA is generally interested in this project, and is generally interested in finding a solution that all parties can accept.
• The EDA wanted information to be provided RE the bonding option.  How would it effect the city (i.e. what are our debt payments).  How much would we recoup in assessments?  Staff worked with Ehlers to provide a preliminary answer to these questions.  That information is included in the "Alternatives" attachment in this case--slide #8.
• The EDA asked how this proposed project would effect the City's business park--from a land price perspective.  In other words, if Hageman Holdings takes on additional assessments, as proposed, are they now priced-out of the market--and our business park is now not competitively priced?  That question was generally addressed in the attached QA Log--page 5.
• The EDA took the general position--that minimizing the City's investment in this project is ideal.  Option B (as outlined in the attached alternatives) is ideal for the City.  However, the EDA understood more discussion is needed, and that input from Capstone is needed.
• The original MOU proposal included a provision for Capstone to not begin repaying assessments for five years.  The EDA requested that Capstone's assessments begin repayment immediately.  Capstone has agreed to that request.
• The original MOU proposal included a provision to allow Hageman Holdings to NOT accrue interest over time.  The EDA requested that the Hageman Holdings assessment does accrue interest over time, and follow industry standards.  Staff has updated the attached MOU accordingly.

Capstone Homes was in attendance of the EDA meeting on 03/09.  They did submit the attached responses to EDA questions.  It should also be noted, Capstone (and Pearson Farms) desire to receive formal direction from the Council on the attached MOU in April.  Several of their agreements, processes, and next steps are contingent upon said direction.
 

Please see "purpose" of this case.