Consider a Code Amendment to the Subdivision Code (Chapter 117) Pertaining to Streets.

During the discussion of the Rum River Retreat plat, it was clear that a provision in Chapter 117 (Subdivision Code) created confusion.  Section 117-614(c)(7) notes that the maximum length of cul-de-sac streets is limited to 600 feet, though two other provisions ((b)(2) and (c)(11)) require extending streets to serve other properties. This leads to confusion as to what is considered a true permanent cul-de-sac and what is a future through street with a temporary cul-de-sac turnaround.  

Ramsey has several roadways that exceed this length and only a few of them actually received variances when their plats were reviewed.  Sapphire Street in Williams Woods, north of 175th Avenue, is a recent example, but not all "permanent" cul-de-sacs have received variances. Attached to this report is a map identifying all the dead-end streets and clusters of streets that have a single access point exceeding 600 feet in length (individual or combined length, respectively).  The map also identifies with streets that are considered permanent (standalone) and those that could be extended into adjacent properties (stub), should those properties develop.    

Staff met and discussed the issue as it has historically been perceived as a public safety issue.  Police noted that their concern arises from having more than one way out of a neighborhood.  The Fire Department noted that the Fire Code specifies street lengths and widths in order to maneuver fire trucks as well as regulations on the number of access points for certain numbers of units (sprinkled or unsprinkled).  Furthermore, streets over 750 feet long are allowed when reviewed by the Fire Marshall.  It was agreed upon to bring forward a Code Amendment that simply strikes the 600-foot language while inserting the Fire Code references.  A representative of the Fire Department will be at the Planning Commission meeting to answer any questions.  

All plats will be reviewed for reasonableness while balancing property owner's rights (both developing properties and adjacent properties).  Sticking firm to a 600-foot limit, even in a temporary situation, and not providing neighboring properties access could be seen as a taking of their development rights.  

A larger-scale revamp of the Subdivision Code is expected over the winter months.  

A public hearing notice was placed in the September 11 Anoka Union-Herald Newspaper.  Amendments to the Subdivision Code are not required to have a public hearing.  

Costs associated with this work are a part of staff's duties. 

Staff recommends approval of the proposed Code Amendment.

Motion to recommend approval of Oridnance #26-18 amending Chapter 117 (Subdivision Code) pertaining to Streets.