PRESENTATION ONLY: Review Concept Plan for Ramsey Raceway; Case of Ramsey Raceway, LLC

The City has received a request from Karl Janzen, registered agent for Ramsey Raceway, LLC. The Applicant currently operates Ramsey Raceway at 14550 Armstrong Blvd NW. The City granted an Interim Use Permit to Ramsey Raceway, as the proposed use was determined to be an acceptable interim use of the site until such time it was needed for roadway purposes. The current site is owned by the City, and is needed for the future Armstrong Interchange, anticipated to commence construction in late 2014 or early 2015.

The Applicant has been in discussions with Anoka County regarding a parcel owned by Anoka County located west of Llama Street, south of Highway 10 (Anoka County PID: 29-32-25-14-0014). Anoka County had originally acquired this parcel for purposes of a future roadway crossing of the Mississippi River into the City of Dayton. This future river crossing is noted in the Comprehensive Plans for both the City and the County. However, the exact timing and alignment is undetermined at this time. With that in mind, Anoka County has expressed interest in allowing Ramsey Raceway to relocate to this site, at least for an interim period of time.

Notification is not required for this presentation. If an official land use application is submitted, the City will follow the required Public Hearing notification procedure.

The Property is located within the R-1 Residential District. This use is classified as Outdoor Commercial Recreation. Outdoor Commercial Recreation is not listed as a Permitted, Conditional, or Accessory Use in this Zoning District. Therefore, an Interim Use Permit or Zoning Amendment to the Official Zoning Map is required.

The request appears to be very similar to the current operation of Ramsey Raceway. The Applicant is proposing a similar clay track with a gravel parking lot for attendees and racers. A very preliminary site plan is attached for your review.

When considering whether or not to approve an Interim Use Permit, the Planning Commission should consider the following factors:
 

1. Is the proposed use consistent with the long term vision for future land use of this parcel (Comprehensive Plan)?
2. Is the proposed use an acceptable use of the Property for an interim period of time, but not the long-term vision of the area?

Other factors to consider are compatibility of the surrounding area and compatibility with the Highway 10 Access Planning Study. The City should be able to gain valuable insight through the potential, future Public Hearing as to the compatibility of the adjacent residential areas (Bowers Drive, Alpaca Estates). Additionally, any site plan would need to ensure the use would not conflict with the proposed Riverdale Drive extension shown in the Highway 10 Access Planning Study.
 

All costs associated with processing the application are the responsibility of the Applicant.

This topic report is intended as a place holder for the Applicant to present initial information to the Planning Commission. The Application does not have sufficient detail at this stage in order for Staff to make a recommendation, nor has Staff had adequate time to analyze the information provided. A more formal recommendation will follow this report if the Applicant decides to proceed forward with an official Application.

No action is being requested with this case. This case is an opportunity for the Planning Commission to relay feedback to the Applicant and submit questions that need to be answered with any official Application.