Skip to main content

AgendaQuick™

View Agenda Item

Regular-General Government   # 43.
Board of Supervisors
County Administrator
Meeting Date:
04/26/2022
Brief Title
Pre-Trial Services and Bail Policy Updates
From:
Tracie Olson, Yolo County Public Defender; Dan Fruchtenicht, Chief Probation Officer, Probation Department
Staff Contact:
Melinda Aiello, Assistant Chief Deputy District Attorney; William Oneto, Probation Division Manager, Probation Department, x5340
Supervisorial District Impact:

Subject

Receive update on bail policy and pre-trial services. (No general fund impact) (Fruchtenicht/Olson/Aiello/Oneto)

Recommended Action

Receive an update on bail policy in Yolo County, and receive presentation on the creation and provision of current pre-trial services provided in Yolo County and the plan to expand pre-trial services in response to Senate Bill 129.

Strategic Plan Goal(s)

Safe Communities

Reason for Recommended Action/Background

Background
Bail Policy: Historically, bail had been set by a "bail schedule" that was tied to the charged offense; courts determine if bail should deviate higher or lower from set amounts. In California Supreme Court in Humphrey (2021), the Supreme Court said, "conditioning freedom solely on whether an arrestee can afford bail is unconstitutional." Courts must consider an arrestee's ability to pay and less-restrictive conditions of release that can reasonably assure appearance in court and the safety of communities. 

Pre-Trial Services: In 2010, the Probation Department was awarded a Byrne Foundation grant to establish and operate a Pre-Trial Services Unit for three years.  The provision of pre-trial services is now largely funded through the Community Corrections Partnership (CCP) to help ensure equal, timely and just administration of laws governing pre-trial release for those accused of a crime and deemed suitable for release from detention pending trial. 
 
Pre-trial functions are critical to the effective operation of local criminal justice systems by assisting the Court in making prompt, fair and effective release/detention decisions, and by monitoring and supervising released defendants to minimize risk of non-appearance at Court proceedings and risk to public safety.  The Pre-Trial Unit is charged with compiling reliable and objective information relevant to the Court’s determination concerning pre-trial release.  If a defendant is not qualified for release on their own recognizance, imposition of conditions of release are considered.  The Pre-Trial Services Unit also provides supervised release services that are the least restrictive conditions necessary to assure the defendant’s appearance in Court, to protect the safety of the community and to safeguard the integrity of the judicial process.
 
Bail Policy in Yolo County
In July of 2021, Yolo County Superior Court modified its bail schedule with amounts now tied to the highest maximum state prison term applicable to the charged offense. Overall, this has reduced bail in most cases. Judges have discretion in setting bail and must consider the Humphrey ruling. This may result in "no bail" under certain circumstances. 

Pre-Trial Assessment Tool
Since 2010, the Probation Department has utilized a scholarly-based Pre-Trial Risk Assessment Instrument from the University of Cincinnati called the Ohio Risk Assessment System.  In October 2019, Senate Bill 36 was signed into law requiring each pre-trial agency that uses a Pre-trial Risk Assessment Instrument to validate that tool by January 1, 2021.  In March 2020, the Probation Department initiated a Request for Proposals process for that purpose and a contract was awarded in May 2020 to the Bauman Consulting Group to validate Yolo County’s Pre-trial Risk Assessment Instrument.  As part of the effort, the Department provided four years of risk assessment data (over 1,200 assessments) for a local validation report.
 
In April 2021, the Probation Department received the final version of the local validation report (Attachment A) which concluded the following:
  • Two goals of pretrial release policy:
    • allow pretrial release whenever possible --> avoid jailing a defendant during the period between his arrest and court disposition. 
    • to minimize the risk to the public of defendants failing to appear and committing new cries during their pre-trial release period.
  • Being detained pretrial was the strongest predictor of negative outcomes
  • No pretrial risk assessment is universally applicable.  Tools need to be modified and validated for each jurisdiction that is using them 
  • It is important to design, evaluate and implement assessment tools locally
  • Risk assessments should be revalidated on a regular basis to ensure that they continue to retain their predictive validity 
  • Purpose of the study: 
    • Test validity
    • Measure bias
  • The Ohio Risk Assessment Tool can make valid risk predictions based on an individual's risk score or level
  • No statistically significant bias was found in SOR revocations based on race, gender, age, nor crime type  
For more information on Pre-Trial Risk Assessment Instruments and the Yolo County’s Probation Department’s continued use of the Ohio Risk Assessment Tool, see the Department’s December 15, 2020 presentation to the Judicial Council (Attachment B).
 
Expansion of Pre-Trial Services
More recently, Senate Bill (SB) 129 California Senate Bill 129 amended the Budget Act of 2021 to allocate $140,000,000 “to the Judicial Council to fund the implementation and operation of ongoing court programs and practices that promote the safe, efficient, fair and timely pretrial release of individuals booked into jail.  The purpose of this funding is to provide courts with information and resources to support: (a) judicial officers in making pretrial release decisions that impose the least restrictive conditions to address public safety and return to court; and (b) implementation of appropriate monitoring practices and provision of services for released individuals.” 
 
SB 129 requires the Judicial Council of California to distribute this funding to 58 California courts and county supervision agencies, providing them with the resources necessary to assist judicial officers in making pre-trial release decisions based on the least restrictive conditions, while ensuring public safety.  For some counties, SB 129 funding will be utilized to establish a pre-trial program.  For other counties, which includes Yolo County, this funding will be utilized to expand existing pre-trial services.  Yolo County’s allocation is one-time funding of $969, 555 to be expended by June 30, 2024 and on-going annual funding of $539,920.  
 
Courts and agencies are also required to contract with their county’s probation department to implement appropriate monitoring practices and pre-trial services programs for released individuals.  In December 2021, Yolo County and the Superior court of California, County of Yolo signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) to outline the agreement between the Probation Department and the Court for the expansion of Yolo County’s Pre-Trial Release Program.  This expansion includes the addition of 3-4 Deputy Probation Officers to facilitate a 365-day operation to achieve the following objectives:
  • Increase the number of individuals assessed
    • Currently, risk assessments are conducted on 50% of all felony bookings
    • Expanded program would have the capacity to conduct risk assessments on 100% of felony bookings with certain agreed upon exemptions
  • Reduce time spent in custody during pre-arraignment
    • Currently, time in custody prior to arraignment is 48-72 hours with no pre-arraignment release decisions made by a Judicial Officer while in custody
    • Expanded program would provide a pre-trial risk assessment score and a recommendation pre-arraignment to a Judicial Officer to facilitate a release decision within 12-18 hours of being booked

Collaborations (including Board advisory groups and external partner agencies)

Superior Court of California, County of Yolo

Fiscal Impact

No Fiscal Impact

Fiscal Impact (Expenditure)

Total cost of recommended action:
$   
Amount budgeted for expenditure:
$   
Additional expenditure authority needed:
$   
On-going commitment (annual cost):
$   

Source of Funds for this Expenditure

General Fund
$0

Attachments

Form Review

Form Started By:
bgabor
Started On:
02/02/2022 01:55 PM
Final Approval Date:
04/18/2022