Consent-General Government # 28.
Board of Supervisors
Financial Services
- Meeting Date:
- 06/06/2023
- Brief Title
- Adopt Amended Capital Administration Policy
From:
Chad Rinde, Chief Financial Officer, Department of Financial Services
Staff Contact:
Holly Alves, Accounting Manager, Department of Financial Services, x8219
Supervisorial District Impact:
Countywide
Subject
Adopt amended Capital Asset Administration Policy to establish intangible capital asset thresholds. (No general fund impact) (Rinde)
Recommended Action
Adopt amended Capital Asset Administration Policy to establish intangible capital asset thresholds.
Strategic Plan Goal(s)
![]() |
In Support of All Goals (Internal Departments Only) |
Reason for Recommended Action/Background
The policy on Capital Asset Administration describes the process for development of the capital improvement plan, roles and responsibilities, as well as defines the accounting treatment of capital assets, such as the thresholds for capitalization of fixed assets. This item is intended to update the fixed asset thresholds for specific items (leases and software) along with other minor revisions to the policy to bring current.
In the past year, the County faces two additional accounting standards that require the County to begin to account for the right to use certain intangible assets, including certain leases and software-based information technology arrangements (SBITA). In these types of arrangements, the County has obligated itself via a contract or agreement to pay for the utilization of this space or software. As these arrangements can be large, long-term, and difficult to change, the Government Accounting Standards Board (GASB) determined through GASB87 and GASB96 that local governments need to account for these agreements recognizing an intangible right to use and to record a liability. The local agency then consumes that right-to-use the facility or software over the time period where access is received while the liability is liquidated as payments are made pursuant to the agreement or contract.
This represents an additional accounting burden to identify these agreements, track the asset and liability over their life, and to perform financial reporting on these individual arrangements. As a result, local governments are allowed to establish an accounting threshold for these types of intangible assets for when these arrangements are significant enough to require this additional accounting treatment. After consulting with the external auditors, other peer counties, and extensive review of these accounting standards, the Department of Financial Services recommends establishing a capitalization threshold of $100,000 for GASB87 Lease arrangements and GASB96 Software Based Subscription Arrangements. The attached Capital Asset Administration Policy contains these changes in a redline version as well as contains a clean version for the Board's consideration.
Should the Board not approve these policy changes, this would require the Department of Financial Services to perform additional accounting and financial reporting for every lease and software agreement regardless of the dollar amount. This would result in inefficiencies of not focusing effort on the most significant arrangements and may require a re-evaluation of the accounting staff needed to perform these new standards. With this policy change, staff believe these additional accounting burdens can be accomplished with existing staff.
In the past year, the County faces two additional accounting standards that require the County to begin to account for the right to use certain intangible assets, including certain leases and software-based information technology arrangements (SBITA). In these types of arrangements, the County has obligated itself via a contract or agreement to pay for the utilization of this space or software. As these arrangements can be large, long-term, and difficult to change, the Government Accounting Standards Board (GASB) determined through GASB87 and GASB96 that local governments need to account for these agreements recognizing an intangible right to use and to record a liability. The local agency then consumes that right-to-use the facility or software over the time period where access is received while the liability is liquidated as payments are made pursuant to the agreement or contract.
This represents an additional accounting burden to identify these agreements, track the asset and liability over their life, and to perform financial reporting on these individual arrangements. As a result, local governments are allowed to establish an accounting threshold for these types of intangible assets for when these arrangements are significant enough to require this additional accounting treatment. After consulting with the external auditors, other peer counties, and extensive review of these accounting standards, the Department of Financial Services recommends establishing a capitalization threshold of $100,000 for GASB87 Lease arrangements and GASB96 Software Based Subscription Arrangements. The attached Capital Asset Administration Policy contains these changes in a redline version as well as contains a clean version for the Board's consideration.
Should the Board not approve these policy changes, this would require the Department of Financial Services to perform additional accounting and financial reporting for every lease and software agreement regardless of the dollar amount. This would result in inefficiencies of not focusing effort on the most significant arrangements and may require a re-evaluation of the accounting staff needed to perform these new standards. With this policy change, staff believe these additional accounting burdens can be accomplished with existing staff.
Collaborations (including Board advisory groups and external partner agencies)
The Department of Financial Services (DFS) collaborated with the County Administrator's Office on this recommendation. In addition, DFS obtained input from the County's external audit firm LSL and the staff Capital Improvement Committee before bringing this forward.
Competitive Bid Process/Vendor Performance
Not applicable.
Fiscal Impact
No Fiscal Impact
Fiscal Impact (Expenditure)
- Total cost of recommended action:
- $ 0
- Amount budgeted for expenditure:
- $ 0
- Additional expenditure authority needed:
- $ 0
- On-going commitment (annual cost):
- $
Source of Funds for this Expenditure
- General Fund
- $0
Further explanation as needed:
There is no fiscal impact of this policy change. This change will reduce the accounting burden associated with new accounting standards required to be implemented by the County of Yolo for the 2022-23 and the 2023-24 fiscal years.
Attachments
Form Review
| Inbox | Reviewed By | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Mark Bryan | Mark Bryan | 05/30/2023 10:33 AM |
| County Counsel | Hope Welton | 05/31/2023 08:51 AM |
- Form Started By:
- crinde
- Started On:
- 05/22/2023 09:32 PM
- Final Approval Date:
- 05/31/2023
