Time Set # 26.
Board of Supervisors
- Meeting Date:
- 09/27/2022
- Brief Title
- INFOR System Update
From:
Lee Gerney, Chief Technology Officer, Innovation and Technology Services Department
Staff Contact:
Lee Gerney, Chief Technology Officer, Innovation and Technology Services Department, x5030
Supervisorial District Impact:
Subject
Receive follow-up report on the upgrade status of the Infor System to the Software-as-a-Service (“SaaS”) Infor CloudSuite Management (ICM) System, review options, approve staff recommendations for a revised project budget of $4,700,130, and authorize the County Chief Technology Officer to execute a change order with RPI Consultants in the amount of $648,890 extending system go live to July 1, 2023. (No general fund Impact) (Gerney)
Recommended Action
-
Receive follow-up report on the upgrade status of the Infor System to the Software-as-a-Service (“SaaS”) Infor CloudSuite Management (ICM) System and review options; and
-
Approve staff recommendation of a revised project budget of $4,700,130; and
-
Authorize the County Chief Technology Officer to execute a change order with RPI Consultants in the amount of $648,890 and extending system go live to July 1, 2023, based on the terms included in Attachment B and subject to approval of the final change order or agreement amendment by County Counsel.
Strategic Plan Goal(s)
![]() |
In Support of All Goals (Internal Departments Only) |
Reason for Recommended Action/Background
County staff presented the INFOR Staff report below to the Board of Supervisors on September 13, 2022. The Board decided to continue the item for decision to the September 27, 2022 meeting and asked County staff to gather additional information that would help to assist with the Board’s deliberation of the best direction for the INFOR system. County staff have gathered the following critical additional information:
SEPTEMBER 13th REPORT
The staff report will discuss a brief background on the project, the progress to date, some of the challenges that have come as part of the implementation, the recommendation from the County’s steering committee on next steps in the implementation and the costs involved.
Background
The Board of Supervisors considered the Infor Upgrade project over the course of 2021 and provided the final approval to move forward on August 31, 2021. The staff report for that meeting reviewed in detail the costs and anticipated benefits associated with the project focusing on the benefits that could be derived in Finance, Human Resources, Procurement, and Information Technology. In addition, the staff report discussed alternatives to the upgrade, which at the time included either delaying the upgrade until the County was closer to the end of support date for current versions of the software or taking additional time to explore other software providers. The August 31, 2021 staff report is included as Attachment A.
The original project began with the timeframes noted below targeting a January 2, 2023 go-live. Below are the key phases with approximate timeframes in the original schedule:
- Board Questions and Answers (Attachment D - Board Q&A) – This document provides written responses to all of the Board questions that occurred at the September 13, 2022 meeting.
- System Benefits (Attachment E - System Benefits & Enhancement) – This document describes the major benefits the County is deriving and how that improves public service and benefits constituents by moving to INFOR Cloudsuite (Version 11).
- Project Team Views (Attachment F - Project Team Survey Results) – This survey was conducted on all key members of the Steering Committee, Project team leads, and Project team members to show their views on whether it is best for the County over the long-term to move to INFOR Version 11 or to source a new system.
- Estimated Timeline and Cost (Attachment G - Estimated Timelines & Costs) – This document attempts to bring transparency as to the timelines and costs for the two major options before the Board so that the critical elements of time and money will be taken into account before a final decision is made.
SEPTEMBER 13th REPORT
The staff report will discuss a brief background on the project, the progress to date, some of the challenges that have come as part of the implementation, the recommendation from the County’s steering committee on next steps in the implementation and the costs involved.
Background
The Board of Supervisors considered the Infor Upgrade project over the course of 2021 and provided the final approval to move forward on August 31, 2021. The staff report for that meeting reviewed in detail the costs and anticipated benefits associated with the project focusing on the benefits that could be derived in Finance, Human Resources, Procurement, and Information Technology. In addition, the staff report discussed alternatives to the upgrade, which at the time included either delaying the upgrade until the County was closer to the end of support date for current versions of the software or taking additional time to explore other software providers. The August 31, 2021 staff report is included as Attachment A.
The original project began with the timeframes noted below targeting a January 2, 2023 go-live. Below are the key phases with approximate timeframes in the original schedule:
- Initiate & Plan (Oct 2021 - Dec 2021)
- Analyze & Design (Oct 2021 - Feb 2022)
- Build & Develop (Feb 2022 - July 2022)
- Verify & Empower (May 2022 - Dec 2022)
- Go Live & Support (Dec 2022 - March 2023, initial target Go-Live Date scheduled for January 2, 2023)
Work Completed to Date
- Current State Analysis & Requirements Review:
The purpose of the current state analysis is to develop an understanding of the current processes in use and how those processes can be improved with the implementation of Infor CloudSuite. RPI Subject Matter Experts from Financial Management, Supply Chain Management, and Human Capital Management, through a series of meetings/workshops and documentation became familiar with the County’s current business processes, procedures, policies, and data needs to properly understand the required business transformation to a future state. Based on these discovery sessions a total of eighteen key opportunities were identified between Finance, Supply Chain and Human Capital Management.
Key Deliverables
- Current State Analysis & Requirements Review:
The purpose of the current state analysis is to develop an understanding of the current processes in use and how those processes can be improved with the implementation of Infor CloudSuite. RPI Subject Matter Experts from Financial Management, Supply Chain Management, and Human Capital Management, through a series of meetings/workshops and documentation became familiar with the County’s current business processes, procedures, policies, and data needs to properly understand the required business transformation to a future state. Based on these discovery sessions a total of eighteen key opportunities were identified between Finance, Supply Chain and Human Capital Management.
Key Deliverables
- Evaluate and document current state business operations (Processes, System Setup & Utilization, Pain Points)
- Identify key opportunities for optimization
- Document high-level requirements for design & migration considerations
- Super User Enablement & Future State Design
Super User Training is designed to train users on software functionality “out of the box.” Super User Training & Future State Design are performed together such that training is performed on a topic and then future state discussions can occur on that topic. This approach allows the core project team to acquire an awareness of the CloudSuite solution capabilities which facilitates the team’s overall understanding of the system and gaps between “out of the box” functionality and desired future state functionality. A new Global Ledger structure was developed that offers more functionality and flexibility than the prior structure offering improved tracking and reporting capabilities.
Key Deliverables
- Train users on functionality “out of the box”
- Document gaps between “out of the box” functionality and desired future state functionality
- Global Ledger Structure
- Finalize future state design
- Data Migration & Unit Testing
The data migration & unit testing phase is designed to take data from the current system and migrate it to the CloudSuite platform based on desired future state design and functionality. Once data migration is performed, system testing and issue resolution is performed to make sure the new system is functioning as intended.
Key Deliverables
The data migration & unit testing phase is designed to take data from the current system and migrate it to the CloudSuite platform based on desired future state design and functionality. Once data migration is performed, system testing and issue resolution is performed to make sure the new system is functioning as intended.
Key Deliverables
- 1st Data Migration & Issue Resolution
- 2nd Data Migration & System Integration Testing & Issue Resolution
Timeline Challenges
While implementation progress continues and substantial work has been completed to date, the overall project is behind schedule for the January 2, 2023 go live date. The original project schedule, despite spanning more than one year, was relatively tight with little room for error given the magnitude of the project and amount of work that needs to be completed. This was due, in part, to the project approval and execution of the consultant agreement taking longer than originally anticipated.
In addition, the project plan and organization chart developed by RPI has demanded far greater time and effort from DFS and HR managerial and executive staff than expected, including but not limited to the DFS Accounting Manager and Procurement Manager, and the HR Assistant Director. As part of the project implementation, the County hired five limited-term positions (Accountant II, Accountant III, Lead Buyer, Sr. Payroll Technician and Sr. Personnel Analyst) to backfill staff who were expected to be assigned full-time to the project team. While these backfill positions have been critical in allowing the project team to focus on the implementation, the time and effort required by managerial and executive staff has been a challenge given existing workload constraints. As a result, certain elements of the implementation plan have not progressed as quickly as anticipated.
The technical complexity of the new system has also impacted the project timeline. While the project remains an upgrade from one version of Infor to another, the new CloudSuite version is substantially different in setup and design, and it has required a significant amount of time to learn the new system and adapt it to County business processes. One element in particular, the Global Ledger, has taken substantial time to develop and design. However, given that the Global Ledger is the fundamental backbone of the County’s financial structure, staff believe that the additional time investment has been warranted to ensure that this critical element is done right.
Steering Committee Recommendations
Due to the substantial amount of work that still needs to be completed and the tight timeline for implementation, the Infor Steering Committee recommends extending the go live date to July 1, 2023. Extending the implementation timeline by six months will provide a few key benefits for the project, including:
While implementation progress continues and substantial work has been completed to date, the overall project is behind schedule for the January 2, 2023 go live date. The original project schedule, despite spanning more than one year, was relatively tight with little room for error given the magnitude of the project and amount of work that needs to be completed. This was due, in part, to the project approval and execution of the consultant agreement taking longer than originally anticipated.
In addition, the project plan and organization chart developed by RPI has demanded far greater time and effort from DFS and HR managerial and executive staff than expected, including but not limited to the DFS Accounting Manager and Procurement Manager, and the HR Assistant Director. As part of the project implementation, the County hired five limited-term positions (Accountant II, Accountant III, Lead Buyer, Sr. Payroll Technician and Sr. Personnel Analyst) to backfill staff who were expected to be assigned full-time to the project team. While these backfill positions have been critical in allowing the project team to focus on the implementation, the time and effort required by managerial and executive staff has been a challenge given existing workload constraints. As a result, certain elements of the implementation plan have not progressed as quickly as anticipated.
The technical complexity of the new system has also impacted the project timeline. While the project remains an upgrade from one version of Infor to another, the new CloudSuite version is substantially different in setup and design, and it has required a significant amount of time to learn the new system and adapt it to County business processes. One element in particular, the Global Ledger, has taken substantial time to develop and design. However, given that the Global Ledger is the fundamental backbone of the County’s financial structure, staff believe that the additional time investment has been warranted to ensure that this critical element is done right.
Steering Committee Recommendations
Due to the substantial amount of work that still needs to be completed and the tight timeline for implementation, the Infor Steering Committee recommends extending the go live date to July 1, 2023. Extending the implementation timeline by six months will provide a few key benefits for the project, including:
- Allow staff to more thoroughly understand how the system works and how to adapt it to County business processes
- Additional time to develop workflows, process automation and other value-added efficiencies
- More data conversions to ensure that the County’s data can successfully migrate to the new version of the system
- Provide a longer testing period to ensure that any system issues are identified and resolved before go live
- Alleviate resource constraints by eliminating overlapping phases that exist within the current project schedule
- Allow adequate time for end user testing and process documentation.
Considering the benefits described above, both the Infor Steering Committee and the project team functional leads believe that extending the go live date to July 1, 2023 is the best option to ensure a successful implementation of the new system. However, this recommendation does come with additional cost. Extending the implementation schedule will require an additional $648,890 in consulting services from the County’s implementation consultant, RPI. This change order will track the terms set forth in Attachment B, subject to additional revisions (but not as to time or dollar amount) in consultation with County Counsel, and allow RPI consultants to remain engaged with the Yolo County Infor CloudSuite Migration project for an extended period of time and provide up to 400 hours of technical development work that the County is unable to complete due to staffing limitations. In addition, staff is requesting funding to cover two smaller project needs, including approximately $40,000 to implement a data archiving solution to ensure that the County’s historical data is maintained upon migration, and $36,000 to migrate the County’s MHC (check printing) solution to an on-premise platform.
A portion of these additional costs can be funded within the existing project budget as a result of savings from not filling one of the limited term backfill positions and utilizing available project contingency funds. For the remainder of the costs, staff recommend using a minor amount of ACO funds and unused Infor-related funding from 2021-22. The table below reflects the revised project budget.
A portion of these additional costs can be funded within the existing project budget as a result of savings from not filling one of the limited term backfill positions and utilizing available project contingency funds. For the remainder of the costs, staff recommend using a minor amount of ACO funds and unused Infor-related funding from 2021-22. The table below reflects the revised project budget.
Infor CloudSuite Migration Project Budget
Infor Cloudsuite Benefits
To date there have been numerous areas of opportunity identified across the 3 functional areas (Human Capital Management, Financial Services Management, Supply Chain) with the project leads over those functional areas expressing their excitement and support for the new system.
Key areas of opportunity:
- Human Capital Management
To date there have been numerous areas of opportunity identified across the 3 functional areas (Human Capital Management, Financial Services Management, Supply Chain) with the project leads over those functional areas expressing their excitement and support for the new system.
Key areas of opportunity:
- Human Capital Management
- Efficiency Enhancements: Many processes done today are performed manually. Using new functionality and workflow processes many of those routine tasks can be automated freeing up valuable resources (i.e. Personnel Actions, Life Changing Benefit Actions)
- Increased access for county staff: Information will be available directly to departments for modification and reporting without HR involvement freeing up HR personnel. (i.e. merit & eval dates)
- Improved processing & reporting: Redesign of position control structures allows for easier processing of personnel transactions. Position budgeting facilitates more timely responses to information requests.
- Supply Chain Management
- Contract Management: New implementation which will introduce many improvements to how contracts are being managed today. Workflows processes and integrated electronic signature will simply contracting processes
- Improved reporting: Better tracking and visibility on county-wide purchasing
- Automation: Manual activities converted to automated workflow processes (i.e. Requisitions & Purchase Order processes)
- Financial Services Management
- Global Ledger: Flexible and dynamic structure to meet the County’s accounting, financial reporting, and budgetary control needs
- Security & Control Structures: Provides the ability to secure data at the department level
- System Flexibility: System is very flexible, configurable and easy to work with. Easy to add custom fields for additional data collection and reporting needs.
Alternatives
There are two primary alternatives to staff’s recommendation to extend the project timeline, described further below:
Alternative #1 – Do not extend the project timeline and keep the original January 2023 go live date. Under this alternative, staff would continue with the current project schedule and attempt to meet the January 2023 go live date. While this alternative would avoid additional consulting costs at this time, this option may not be realistically feasible. Meeting a January go live date would require that all members of the project team, including DFS and HR managerial staff, be dedicated full-time to the project through the remainder of the implementation. This scenario would likely result in substantial impacts to County operations and initiatives, including:
There are two primary alternatives to staff’s recommendation to extend the project timeline, described further below:
Alternative #1 – Do not extend the project timeline and keep the original January 2023 go live date. Under this alternative, staff would continue with the current project schedule and attempt to meet the January 2023 go live date. While this alternative would avoid additional consulting costs at this time, this option may not be realistically feasible. Meeting a January go live date would require that all members of the project team, including DFS and HR managerial staff, be dedicated full-time to the project through the remainder of the implementation. This scenario would likely result in substantial impacts to County operations and initiatives, including:
- Significant delay in the time frame for developing contracts and agreements, including time-sensitive American Rescue Plan contracts
- Delayed recruitment efforts by Human Resources, which would exacerbate the County’s already high vacancy rate
- Delay or temporary hold on classification and compensation projects and related Board items
- Impact to the 2023-24 budget development process due to delay in developing salary and benefit projections
- Limited support for key County initiatives such as updating the Long-Term Financial Plan.
In addition, the compressed schedule required to meet a January 1, 2023 go live date would potentially jeopardize the overall success of the project by limiting the time available for system testing and end user training. There could be in additional need to additional reconfiguration, need to postpone certain functionality, or other post go-live support costs as a result.
Alternative #2 – Abandon the Infor CloudSuite Migration Project in its entirety. Under this scenario, staff would terminate the agreement with RPI and stop all work on the Infor upgrade project. Costs already incurred of more than $1 million would be sunk costs. The County could then either immediately begin a new RFP process for a different ERP system, or use the current version of Infor until it is no longer supported and then proceed with an RFP process. The County will also need to negotiate with Infor to end its SAAS agreements and to return to agreements prior to the approved upgrade.
The County’s current version of Infor is still on a hosted solution, rather than a cloud-based Software-as-a-Service model, and is expected to lose support in approximately the next 2-3 years. While the Infor costs to-date have been significant, the cost of transitioning to a different system would be substantial. While a comprehensive study has not been performed, some relevant data points may provide an indication as to possible comparable costs if the County considers this alternative:
Alternative #2 – Abandon the Infor CloudSuite Migration Project in its entirety. Under this scenario, staff would terminate the agreement with RPI and stop all work on the Infor upgrade project. Costs already incurred of more than $1 million would be sunk costs. The County could then either immediately begin a new RFP process for a different ERP system, or use the current version of Infor until it is no longer supported and then proceed with an RFP process. The County will also need to negotiate with Infor to end its SAAS agreements and to return to agreements prior to the approved upgrade.
The County’s current version of Infor is still on a hosted solution, rather than a cloud-based Software-as-a-Service model, and is expected to lose support in approximately the next 2-3 years. While the Infor costs to-date have been significant, the cost of transitioning to a different system would be substantial. While a comprehensive study has not been performed, some relevant data points may provide an indication as to possible comparable costs if the County considers this alternative:
- GFOA estimated in 2013 that the County’s ERP implementation would likely cost $5-$8 million for an ERP system at that time. This cost escalated using CPI to 2022 dollars would be $6.1 to $9.8 million.
- Butte County executed a contract for a new ERP system with Workday in January 2021. The costs taken to their board included a $10.6 million cost including the software subscription, training, implementation consultant and GFOA implementation advisor.
- Napa County executed an agreement for a new ERP system with Tyler Technologies for a new ERP system (including finance and HR) in March 2020. The costs taken to their board included $6.3 million including implementation costs, 3 years maintenance, GFOA consulting, and additional staffing.
- Placer County executed a contract for a new ERP system with Workday in February 2017. The estimated five-year funding was $16.1 million which included the hosting, training, implementation, project management, and staffing for the project.
Future Infor Project-Related Costs
If the County continues with the Infor upgrade project, there are other project-related needs for which additional funding may be requested at a later time. These items include the following:
If the County continues with the Infor upgrade project, there are other project-related needs for which additional funding may be requested at a later time. These items include the following:
- Workforce Management (WFM) upgrade – WFM serves as the County’s timekeeping system, and also manages employee leave balances and time off requests. As part of the migration to Infor CloudSuite, staff evaluated the possibility of upgrading to a new cloud-based version of the WFM software. However, the price quote from Infor for this upgrade was more than $600,000, which the Steering Committee felt was simply too expensive to pursue at this time. As a result, the decision was made to stay with the current version of WFM while staff negotiate for a lower price or evaluate alternate timekeeping systems through an RFP process. It should be noted that Infor intends to stop supporting our current version of WFM at some point in the future, so an upgrade or migration to a different system will needed eventually.
- Time Study/Cost Allocation – The County is in need of a time study solution that can replace a myriad of time study systems currently used by County departments. Ideally such a system will also be able to allocate salary and benefit costs based on the time study recorded, which would eliminate the need for manual and time-intensive journal entries to allocate costs. Staff view this as a key functionality that would significantly increase efficiency and reduce data entry errors. Unfortunately, WFM is not designed with this functionality “out of the box.” Infor has indicated a willingness to co-develop this functionality with Yolo County free of charge; however, as noted above staff feel that more due diligence is needed before moving forward with an upgrade to WFM.
- Sherpa Budget System Redesign – As part of the migration to Infor CloudSuite, the County’s general ledger hierarchy and chart of accounts will be significantly restructured. To accommodate these changes, the Sherpa budget system will need to undergo some restructuring to mirror the new financial structure. Sherpa has provided a preliminary price quote of $30,000, and a funding request for this work has been submitted as part of the 2022-23 Adopted Budget.
- Ephesoft Document Automation – Staff is currently evaluating a third-party system that has the potential to greatly automate certain routine processes such as invoice payments. The vendor has provided a brief demonstration of the system that highlighted its potential benefits; however, staff feel that more information is needed to determine whether the automated workflows are compatible with County review and approval processes. The project team is further working with Infor to determine scope of work and any relevant costs involved.
Collaborations (including Board advisory groups and external partner agencies)
Innovation & Technology Services, Department of Financial Services, Health & Human Resources, Human Resources, County Administrator's Office. The Infor steering committee collaborated on the strategic direction of the Infor Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system to arrive at the present recommendation to extend go live until July, 2023.
Fiscal Impact
Fiscal impact (see budgetary detail below)
Fiscal Impact (Expenditure)
- Total cost of recommended action:
- $ 315,558
- Amount budgeted for expenditure:
- $ 0
- Additional expenditure authority needed:
- $ 315,558
- One-time commitment:
- Yes
Source of Funds for this Expenditure
- ACO Fund
- $65,503
- Carryforward
- $250,055
Further explanation as needed:
Board item requests additional expenditure authority. The project budget and contigency were reviewed first to minimize the overall net cost increase. After using contigency funds and staff savings on the project, the net increase is $315,558.
Attachments
- Att. A. 8/31/21 Staff Report
- Att. B. Extension Amendment
- Att. C. September 13 Presentation
- Att. D. Board Q&A
- Att. E. System Benefits & Enhancements
- Att. F. Project Team Survey Results
- Att. G. Estimated Timelines & Costs
- Att. H. Presentation
Form Review
| Inbox | Reviewed By | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Lee Gerney | Lee Gerney | 09/19/2022 05:20 PM |
| Financial Services | crinde | 09/22/2022 10:10 AM |
| County Counsel | Hope Welton | 09/22/2022 10:16 AM |
- Form Started By:
- Julie Dachtler
- Started On:
- 09/14/2022 02:28 PM
- Final Approval Date:
- 09/22/2022
