Skip to main content

AgendaQuick™

View Agenda Item

Regular-General Government   # 40.
Board of Supervisors
County Administrator
Meeting Date:
03/22/2022
Brief Title
American Rescue Plan Update - Parks & Facilities
From:
Chad Rinde, Interim County Administrator, County Administrator's Office
Staff Contact:
Eric Will, ARP Project Manager, County Administrator's Office, x8157
Supervisorial District Impact:

Subject

Receive update on American Rescue Plan Parks & Facilities Recommendations and provide board direction. (No general fund impact) (Rinde/Yarris/Will)

Recommended Action

Receive update on American Rescue Plan Parks & Facilities Recommendations and provide board direction.

Strategic Plan Goal(s)

Thriving Residents
Safe Communities
Sustainable Environment
Robust Economy

Reason for Recommended Action/Background

American Rescue Plan Background
On November 23, 2021, staff provided an update to the Board regarding the five American Rescue Plan (ARP) priority category workgroups, including the Parks & Facilities workgroup. Since that meeting, staff has met with the workgroup and the board liaisons to discuss several items under the subcategories approved by the Board in November 2021. This item presents a recommendation and opportunity for the Board to determine the next steps for the $3,000,000 for projects under the Parks & Facilities priority category. Staff will return with contracts at a future Board meeting based on direction received at the March 22, 2022 meeting. The table below presents the Parks & Facilities workgroup's allocation budget.
 
Subcategory Targeted Funding Level Percent of Allocation
Capital Investment $1,950,000 65%
Programming $300,000 10%
Marketing $600,000 20%
Equipment $150,000 5%
Total $3,000,000 100%

Parks & Facilities Proposals/Recommendations
Staff considered 7 (seven) proposals that would generally fit under this category and are recommending 6 of those proposals for either full or partial funding. Unlike the other ARP Priority Categories, the primary input into Parks & Facilities has been from internal proposals. Furthermore, staff will present two recommendations that reflect the Parks & Facilities workgroup and the Board Liaisons. These recommendations differed due to changing circumstances around the Knight's Landing Park and the County's lack of available funding for this transformational and much-needed asset in the community of Knight's Landing. At the time of the workgroup recommendation, staff had applied for a fourth time to the State for funding for that project and were hopeful that funding would arise out of the development of a competitive proposal. However, staff was notified recently that the County would not be receiving that funding. With this information in hand, the Board Liaisons were interested in using ARP funding to jumpstart the first phase of work for that project in order to leverage these one-time funds for future State funding opportunities. Both the workgroup and Board Liaison recommendations were presented to the Parks, Recreation, and Wildlife Advisory Committee (PRWAC) at their meeting on February 15, 2022. Despite a shift from the workgroup proposal to the Board Liaison proposal, the proposed staff recommendation would still provide for funding for Tuli Mem improvements, which have been denoted by both the Parks & Facilities workgroup and the PRWAC as an important area of need for the growing community of Esparto. Matrices of the workgroup and board liaisons may be found below, along with recommendations for funding. All proposals may be found in Attachment A. One proposal that is not available with this staff report is related to the Parks Marketing Program Implementation effort. Staff is currently fine-tuning the scope of work to align with the existing Parks Marketing Plan and other policy documents. However, as with all ARP contracts, any work associated with this effort will be brought to the Board for contract approval and execution.

Parks & Facilities Workgroup Recommendation
Proposal Organization Funding Request Workgroup Conclusion Workgroup Recommendation
Putah Creek Fishing Access #3 General Services/Parks $437,838 Supportive $437,838
Knight's Landing Park (Phase I) County Administrator's Office $4,100,000 Supportive $195,496
Tuli Mem Park Improvements County Administrator's Office $1,316,666 Supportive $1,316,666
Valley Vista Trails Tuleyome $32,367 Supportive $32,367
Proposition 68 Match General Services/Parks $14,400 Supportive $14,400
Environmental Education Program Yolo Basin Foundation $32,000 Supportive $32,000
Parks Marketing Program Implementation General Services/Parks $100,000 Supportive $100,000
Total   $6,033,271   $2,128,767
Remaining Funds       $871,233

Parks & Facilities Board Liaison Recommendation
Proposal Organization Funding Request Board Liaison Conclusion Board Liaison Recommendation
Putah Creek Fishing Access #3 General Services/Parks $437,838 Not Recommended for this funding source $0
Knight's Landing Park (Phase I) County Administrator's Office $4,100,000 Supportive $1,620,000
Tuli Mem Park Improvements County Administrator's Office $1,316,666 Supportive $330,000
Valley Vista Trails Tuleyome $32,367 Supportive $32,367
Proposition 68 Match General Services/Parks $14,400 Supportive $14,400
Environmental Education Program Yolo Basin Foundation $32,000 Supportive $32,000
Parks Marketing Program Implementation General Services/Parks $100,000 Supportive $100,000
Total   $6,033,271   $2,128,767
Remaining Funds       $871,233

Both recommendations would utilize the same level of funding at $2,128,767, leaving a balance of $871,233 in available funds in the Parks & Facilities Priority Category. At this time, staff would recommend the Board Liaison recommendation for several reasons, including the following:
  • There may be available State funding for the Putah Creek Fishing Access #3 site and some level of fiduciary responsibility from the State regarding the operations and maintenance of the site;
  • The Knight's Landing Park would provide facilities for a community that currently has no park/community facilities, thus transforming an area of the County through these funds. While there is a growing need in Esparto and thus at Tuli Mem, ARP funding should, where possible, target areas in most need. Furthermore, a recommendation for $330,000 would provide significant funding at Tuli Mem for some of the phased work indicated in Attachment A of this staff report; and
  • Valley Vista and the Yolo Basin Foundation proposals represent one-time investments that will provide ongoing benefits throughout the County, including education and outreach and stipends for volunteers to complete lasting trail work. Both of these proposals target recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic and offer engagement with the community at large.
Staff also anticipates providing a comprehensive overview of how each recommendation aligns with the Board's Guiding Principles when presenting at the Board meeting on March 22.

Should the Board choose to advance this recommendation, the following balance would be available within each of the Parks & Facilities Subcategories:
 
Subcategory Funding Level Percent of Allocation Recommended Funding Remaining Funding
Capital Investment $1,950,000 65% $1,950,000 $0
Programming $300,000 10% $78,767 $221,233
Marketing $600,000 20% $100,000 $500,000
Equipment $150,000 5% $0 $1,500,000
Total $3,000,000 100% $2,128,767 $871,223

The Parks & Facilities workgroup noted their interest in utilizing any leftover funding in this Priority Category for Parks & Facilities projects and would be interested in seeing staff return with additional proposals for the remaining funding. Staff might also consider soliciting additional proposals or shifting dollars within the Priority Category subcategories, should that be in the interest of the Board.

Collaborations (including Board advisory groups and external partner agencies)

Many agencies

Fiscal Impact

No Fiscal Impact

Fiscal Impact (Expenditure)

Total cost of recommended action:
$   
Amount budgeted for expenditure:
$   
Additional expenditure authority needed:
$   
On-going commitment (annual cost):
$   

Source of Funds for this Expenditure

General Fund
$0

Attachments

Form Review

Inbox Reviewed By Date
Mark Bryan Mark Bryan 03/15/2022 10:55 AM
Form Started By:
ewill
Started On:
01/26/2022 09:01 AM
Final Approval Date:
03/17/2022