Regular-General Government # 41.
Board of Supervisors
County Counsel
- Meeting Date:
- 11/22/2016
- Brief Title
- Revise Planning Commission Appointment Process
From:
Philip J. Pogledich, County Counsel
Staff Contact:
Philip J. Pogledich, County Counsel, x8172
Supervisorial District Impact:
Subject
Introduce by title only, waive first reading, and receive public comment on an ordinance amending provisions of the Yolo County Code relating to the appointment of Planning Commissioners. (No general fund impact) (Pogledich)
Recommended Action
- Introduce by title only, waive first reading, and receive public comment on an ordinance amending provisions of the Yolo County Code relating to the appointment of Planning Commissioners; and
- Continue the ordinance to the next regularly scheduled meeting on December 13, 2016 for waiver of a second reading and consideration for adoption.
Strategic Plan Goal(s)
Thriving Residents
Safe Communities
Sustainable Environment
Flourishing Agriculture
Safe Communities
Sustainable Environment
Flourishing Agriculture
Reason for Recommended Action/Background
At the conclusion of an October 25 agenda item relating to Planning Commission appointments, the Board of Supervisors directed staff to prepare an ordinance with the following changes:
Consistent with the Board’s direction, the new and revised provisions do not express any preference regarding the background or experience of at large Commissioners. This ensures the Board will have full discretion to appoint the most highly qualified individuals while also considering background, experience, and other issues as appropriate to ensure the Planning Commission is balanced and effective. The additional change with regard to district nominees (allowing cross-district appointments) helps to reinforce this approach.
- Eliminate language that restricts the appointment of “at large” Commissioners (two of the seven seats) residing in incorporated cities and otherwise tends to preclude city residents from holding an at large seat on the Planning Commission; and
- Allow a supervisor to nominate a resident living outside of his/her supervisorial district for a vacant district seat on the Planning Commission.
Consistent with the Board’s direction, the new and revised provisions do not express any preference regarding the background or experience of at large Commissioners. This ensures the Board will have full discretion to appoint the most highly qualified individuals while also considering background, experience, and other issues as appropriate to ensure the Planning Commission is balanced and effective. The additional change with regard to district nominees (allowing cross-district appointments) helps to reinforce this approach.
Collaborations (including Board advisory groups and external partner agencies)
This item was prepared in consultation with the Clerk of the Board.
Fiscal Impact
No Fiscal Impact
Fiscal Impact (Expenditure)
- Total cost of recommended action:
- $
- Amount budgeted for expenditure:
- $
- Additional expenditure authority needed:
- $
- On-going commitment (annual cost):
- $
Source of Funds for this Expenditure
- General Fund
- $0
Attachments
Form Review
| Inbox | Reviewed By | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Phil Pogledich | Phil Pogledich | 11/14/2016 05:18 PM |
| County Counsel (Originator) | Phil Pogledich | 11/15/2016 10:24 AM |
- Form Started By:
- Phil Pogledich
- Started On:
- 11/10/2016 02:50 PM
- Final Approval Date:
- 11/15/2016