Commissioners received an update on the PROSE Master Plan from Rebecca Sayers. Staff reported that, following an initial check-in, a formal kick-off meeting with the consultant was held approximately one month ago. Since then, staff have compiled relevant PROSE materials into a SharePoint site, including an inventory of assets and a summary of Open Space guiding principles such as 10-minute access, connectivity, and maintenance considerations. Budget information for the current fiscal year, the past five years, and future projections (when available) has also been shared. The next check-in with the consultant is scheduled for the following week. Initial billing indicates work has begun on community data collection, and staff have provided a list of community stakeholders and partners.
Commissioner Norton asked whether topics identified during the Regional Plan process but not included could be incorporated into the Master Plan. Rebecca agreed this would be valuable, and Commissioners supported using the Master Plan to provide more detailed, actionable guidance aligned with the Regional Plan.
Discussion followed on funding mechanisms, including development impact fees. Rebecca noted that the City of Flagstaff currently does not use impact fees for Open Space (OS) or Parks and Recreation, though the City is currently reviewing this potential.
Commissioners discussed the 10-minute access goal and the role of developers in providing open space. It was noted that developer-provided spaces are often limited, and Rebecca stated it is generally more effective for the City to acquire and manage open space directly.
Commissioner Norton asked about walkability mapping and level of service (LOS) analysis. Robert confirmed a 2018 GIS walkability analysis exists and noted that LOS metrics used in Parks could potentially be adapted for Open Space. A land value rating system was not identified as part of current PROSE practices, although Robert did review the Conservation Values matrix developed for open space acquisition and prioritization.
Commissioner Kluwin raised questions about defining passive versus active recreation and including the idea of passive recreation in a mission statement for open space. Rebecca responded that the consultant will be working with PROSE staff to help define and refine the mission, values, and guiding principles for each PROSE section. She noted that this process may present an opportunity to revisit and update how passive recreation is defined and incorporated. She also emphasized that interpretations of passive recreation can vary among community members, and that staff aim to define Open Space in a way that best reflects community need. Robert noted Regional Plan definitions differ from Open Space perspectives but agreed the topic warrants further exploration.
Trail connectivity was discussed, including coordination with FUTS and partner agencies. PROSE staff emphasized collaboration with Engineering and noted that the Master Plan should complement, not duplicate, existing plans. Some planning areas fall outside PROSE’s purview but will involve interdepartmental coordination.
Chair Thomas asked about viewsheds; Rebecca clarified PROSE does not have regulatory authority but could include viewsheds as a guiding value.
Commissioners acknowledged that some topics, including enforceability and jurisdiction, fall outside PROSE authority and should be discussed with the consultant. The Master Plan scope is expected to include funding analyses and priorities. Commissioners emphasized the need for a clear, actionable plan with priorities, timelines, and implementation strategies. It was noted that master plans are typically updated every five years to account for changing local conditions.
To questions about any recent SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats) analyses performed, Rebecca noted the consultant may lead the Commission and/or the community through this exercise in their community input phase. She also explained that the Master Plan will provide high-level direction, with more detailed implementation planning to follow through staff-led efforts.
Commissioner Norton asked about forming any kind of volunteer task force or non-profit partners to compliment the Open Space section, such as a trail planning group. Rebecca noted that several such organizations exist in Flagstaff, including the Flagstaff Trails Initiative and Flagstaff Biking Organization.
Chair Thomas emphasized the importance of consistent language, addressing residential disparities, and ensuring the plan reflects diverse community needs, including those not engaged through traditional outreach.
Commissioner Joyce asked about the extent to which the Open Space Master Plan could influence or establish requirements for actions taken by external agencies. Rebecca clarified the Master Plan serves as a guiding document and cannot impose requirements on outside entities.
Commissioner Kluwin stressed maintaining an Open Space-specific focus within the plan and encouraged identifying key priorities. Rebecca noted the consultant will guide discussions and encouraged Commissioners to review other documents developed by the consultant, Kimley-Horn, on their
website.
During public comment, Commissioner White asked about the plan’s vision. Rebecca described it as a 10–15 year guiding document balancing immediate actions with long-term goals. Commissioners supported a forward-looking approach that blends practical implementation with visionary planning.
