Consent 4.
Regular Board of Supervisors Meeting
Clerk of Superior Courts
- Meeting Date:
- 11/17/2015
- Title:
- Award of Contracts for Restoration to Competency Services and Rule 11 Evaluations
- Submitted By:
- Terry Hudson, Procurement
- Department:
- Procurement
Presentation:
No A/V Presentation
Recommendation:
Approve
Document Signatures:
BOS Signature NOT Required
# of ORIGINALS
Submitted for Signature:
Submitted for Signature:
0
NAME
of PRESENTER:
of PRESENTER:
Terry Hudson
TITLE
of PRESENTER:
of PRESENTER:
Procurement Director
Mandated Function?:
Not Mandated
Source of Mandate
or Basis for Support?:
or Basis for Support?:
Docket Number (If applicable):
Information
Agenda Item Text:
Approve the Award of Request for Qualifications (RFQ) 16-08-SUP-04 for Restoration to Competency Services and Rule 11 Evaluations for the Superior Court for the period of November 17, 2015 through October 31, 2017 with possible renewals for up to three additional one year terms.
Background:
RFQ No. 16-08-SUP-04 was released on September 9, 2015 for the purpose of creating an on call list of providers for Restoration to Competency Services (RTC) and Rule 11 Evaluations to be administered in Cochise County. The solicitation was advertised in the Arizona Range News on 8/26/2015 and 9/2/2015 and posted on the Public Purchase website. E-mail notifications were sent out to twenty nine providers. Five responses were received prior to the solicitation closing date of October 1, 2015 at 4:00 p.m. An evaluation panel consisting of representatives from Pima and Cochise County Superior Court and the County Health and Social Services evaluated the submittals and determined all five providers to be qualified to provide the services. The five doctors that responded are:
Dr. Sloan R. King, Ph.D, CRC – Restoration to Competency and Rule 11 Evaluations
Barry Morenz, M.D. – Rule 11 Evaluations
Aimee C. Kaempf, M.D. – Rule 11 Evaluations
Joanna Katsanis, Ph.D. – Rule 11 Evaluations
Serena Gourgueiro, Psy.D.LLC _ Rule 11 Evaluations
Dr. Sloan R. King, Ph.D, CRC – Restoration to Competency and Rule 11 Evaluations
Barry Morenz, M.D. – Rule 11 Evaluations
Aimee C. Kaempf, M.D. – Rule 11 Evaluations
Joanna Katsanis, Ph.D. – Rule 11 Evaluations
Serena Gourgueiro, Psy.D.LLC _ Rule 11 Evaluations
Department's Next Steps (if approved):
Execute contracts. Assign cases on a rotation basis. Monitor provider’s performance.
Impact of NOT Approving/Alternatives:
Clients needing these services will have to be transported to Pima County for treatment.
To BOS Staff: Document Disposition/Follow-Up:
Copies of the contracts will be hand carried to the Clerk of the Board when assigned.
Fiscal Impact
- Fiscal Year:
- One-time Fixed Costs? ($$$):
- Ongoing Costs? ($$$):
- County Match Required? ($$$):
- A-87 Overhead Amt? (Co. Cost Allocation $$$):
- Source of Funding?:
Fiscal Impact & Funding Sources (if known):
Superior Court has budgeted for this expenditure in the FY 15/16 budget. A couple of year’s ag0, the County through a partnership with the Superior Court began a pilot program to conduct some RTC’s in the jail, approximately six to twelve are expected per year. When the program began Pima County charged Cochise County $20,000 for each RTC. For every in custody RTC the County saves $12,500. This year the rate Pima County charges is $30,000, producing a savings of $22,500. Next year, the Pima County rate will rise to $39,000, so the savings will be $31,500.
Savings in this current year will be between $135,000 and $270,000. Savings next year is anticipated to be between $189,000 and $378,000.
Savings in this current year will be between $135,000 and $270,000. Savings next year is anticipated to be between $189,000 and $378,000.
Attachments
No file(s) attached.