Consent 4.
Regular Board of Supervisors Meeting
County Attorney
- Meeting Date:
- 05/10/2016
- Title:
- Approve Proposed Settlement of a Tax Appeal
- Submitted By:
- Rebecca Deatherage, County Attorney
- Department:
- County Attorney
Presentation:
No A/V Presentation
Recommendation:
Approve
Document Signatures:
BOS Signature NOT Required
# of ORIGINALS
Submitted for Signature:
Submitted for Signature:
0
NAME
of PRESENTER:
of PRESENTER:
n/a
TITLE
of PRESENTER:
of PRESENTER:
n/a
Docket Number (If applicable):
Mandated Function?:
Not Mandated
Source of Mandate
or Basis for Support?:
or Basis for Support?:
Information
Agenda Item Text:
Approve the proposed tax appeal settlement in Klump v. Cochise County, ST2015-000597, now pending in the Arizona Tax Court, a division of the Superior Court of Arizona in Maricopa County.
Background:
Taxpayer filed a civil action in Arizona Tax Court, seeking a reduction in assessed value of non-residential real properties, identified as assessor parcel number 406-17-002, 406-17-003, 406-17-004, 406-21-001, 406-21-002, 406-21-003, 406-21-005A, 406-21-018, 406-21-019, 406-21-020, 406-21-021, 406-21-022, 406-21-028, 406-21-031, 410-01-034, 410-01-035, 410-01-036, 410-01-037, 410-01-038, 410-01-039, 410-01-040, 410-01-041, 410-01-042, 410-01-043, 410-01-044, 410-01-045, 410-01-046, 410-01-047, 410-01-062, 410-01-066, 410-01-067, 410-01-069, 410-01-070, 411-15-003, with a property addresses in Cochise County, Arizona, for tax year 2015.
After inspecting the properties, reviewing the taxpayer’s documentation and other market factors/comparables, the Assessor agrees that the property valuation should be adjusted for tax year 2016. The Assessor recommended a settlement offer that adjusts the full cash value and limited property value as follows:
2016 TAX YEAR FROM TO
The taxpayer accepted the settlement offer.
Fiscal Impact & Funding Sources: Not applicable, no funding sources are required. Fiscal impact will be a reduction in the tax base.
After inspecting the properties, reviewing the taxpayer’s documentation and other market factors/comparables, the Assessor agrees that the property valuation should be adjusted for tax year 2016. The Assessor recommended a settlement offer that adjusts the full cash value and limited property value as follows:
2016 TAX YEAR FROM TO
- 406-17-002: FCV $35,686.00 FCV $500.00
- 406-17-003 FCV $82,973.00 FCV $1,680.00
- 406-17-004 FCV $77,860.00 FCV $1,470.00
- 406-21-001 FCV $87,164.00 FCV $2,310.00
- 406-21-002: FCV $147,854.00 FCV $28,630.00
- 406-21-003 FCV $231,342.00 FCV $91,937.00
- 406-21-005A FCV $36,120.00 FCV $1,050.00
- 406-21-018 FCV $12,578.00 FCV $500.00
- 406-21-019: FCV $12,569 .00 FCV $500.00
- 406-21-020 FCV $12,557.00 FCV $500.00
- 406-21-021 FCV $12,541.00 FCV $500.00
- 406-21-022 FCV $12,529.00 FCV $500.00
- 406-21-028: FCV $12,025.00 FCV $500.00
- 406-21-031 FCV $7,234.00 FCV $500.00
- 410-01-034 FCV $8,719.00 FCV $500.00
- 410-01-035 FCV $8,719.00 FCV $500.00
- 410-01-036: FCV $8,721.00 FCV $500.00
- 410-01-037 FCV $34,308.00 FCV $500.00
- 410-01-038 FCV $8,728.00 FCV $500.00
- 410-01-039 FCV $8,725.00 FCV $500.00
- 410-01-040: FCV $8,723.00 FCV $500.00
- 410-01-041 FCV $8,726.00 FCV $500.00
- 410-01-042 FCV $8,728.00 FCV $500.00
- 410-01-043 FCV $8,725.00 FCV $500.00
- 410-01-044: FCV $8,721.00 FCV $500.00
- 410-01-045 FCV $8,719.00 FCV $500.00
- 410-01-046 FCV $8,712.00 FCV $500.00
- 410-01-047 FCV $8,714.00 FCV $500.00
- 410-01-062 FCV $8,710.00 FCV $500.00
- 410-01-066 FCV $8,716.00 FCV $500.00
- 410-01-067 FCV $8,710.00 FCV $500.00
- 410-01-069 FCV $8,714.00 FCV $500.00
- 410-01-070 FCV $8,716.00 FCV $500.00
- 411-15-003 FCV $25,384.00 FCV $1,660.00
The taxpayer accepted the settlement offer.
Fiscal Impact & Funding Sources: Not applicable, no funding sources are required. Fiscal impact will be a reduction in the tax base.
Department's Next Steps (if approved):
Upon approval by the Board, Counsel for the County will sign a stipulation for entry of Judgment that has already been signed by the taxpayer, and will submit a form of Judgment to the Arizona Tax Court disposing of this matter pursuant to the settlement terms.
Impact of NOT Approving/Alternatives:
Should the Board not approve the proposed settlement, the County will be subject to additional litigation and associated fees and costs. In addition, the Arizona Tax Court could rule in the taxpayer’s favor, thereby reducing the assessed value of the subject property even further and subjecting the County to paying the Plaintiff’s fees and costs.
To BOS Staff: Document Disposition/Follow-Up:
Advise County Attorney's Office - Civil Division upon Board's approval.
Attachments
No file(s) attached.