 |
AGENDA ITEM REVIEW FORM |
6.G.
Regular City Council Meeting
- Meeting Date:
- 01/13/2016
- Department Head:
- Rosendo Morales
- Submitted By:
- Andrea Ruiz, Court Administrator, Court
Action Requested:
Motion
ITEM:
Discussion and possible action on any and all matters regarding the Second Reading of Ordinance No. 345. An ordinance of the Mayor and Council of the City of San Luis, Arizona, amending Section 34.05(E) of the City Code relating to Municipal Court Probation Fees; repealing any conflicting provisions; and providing for severability. (Rosendo Morales, Jr., Court Magistrate)
A. Approval of Second Reading of Ordinance No. 345 by title only
B. Approval and adoption of Ordinance No. 345
A. Approval of Second Reading of Ordinance No. 345 by title only
B. Approval and adoption of Ordinance No. 345
SUMMARY:
The supporting attachments are:
1. a table showing a summary of the changes,
2. the proposed Ordinance No. 345, and
3. the current City Codes.
Here also is a link to the City Code for comparison:
http://library.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/sanluis_az/cityofsanluisarizonacodeofordinances?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:sanluis_az
The ordinance is designated to reflect current trends in probation practices and with the proposed fees will off-set the cost of carrying out services to probationers. The Court will impose these fees as a condition of probation unless under City Code procedures the Court determines the inability of the probationer to pay and imposes a lesser fee or in the case of extreme hardship, no fee at all. Compliance Officers will ensure that probationers will comply with their conditions of probation as imposed by the Court.
1. a table showing a summary of the changes,
2. the proposed Ordinance No. 345, and
3. the current City Codes.
Here also is a link to the City Code for comparison:
http://library.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/sanluis_az/cityofsanluisarizonacodeofordinances?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:sanluis_az
The ordinance is designated to reflect current trends in probation practices and with the proposed fees will off-set the cost of carrying out services to probationers. The Court will impose these fees as a condition of probation unless under City Code procedures the Court determines the inability of the probationer to pay and imposes a lesser fee or in the case of extreme hardship, no fee at all. Compliance Officers will ensure that probationers will comply with their conditions of probation as imposed by the Court.
RECOMMENDATION / SUGGESTED MOTION:
1. MOTION TO APPROVE SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 345 BY TITLE ONLY.
2. MOTION TO ADOPT AND APPROVE ORDINANCE NO. 345.
2. MOTION TO ADOPT AND APPROVE ORDINANCE NO. 345.
Fiscal Impact
- IS THERE FISCAL IMPACT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ITEM:
- n/a
- CITY/STATE/FEDERAL FUNDS:
- n/a
- TOTAL:
- n/a
- BUDGETED:
- n/a
- AVAILABLE TO TRANSFER:
- n/a
- ACCOUNT #/REMAINING BALANCE:
- n/a
FISCAL IMPACT STATEMENT (IF THIS IS A BUDGET TRANSFER, YOU MUST ATTACH THE BUDGET ADJUSTMENT FORM):
This Ordinance is expected to assist the Court to pay for some of the costs of its probation programs.