Consent-General Government # 23.
Board of Supervisors
General Services
- Meeting Date:
- 12/09/2025
- Brief Title
- Procurement Policy Revision
From:
Ryan Pistochini, Director of General Services, General Services Department
Staff Contact:
Tonia Murphy, Deputy Director, General Services Department, x4830
Supervisorial District Impact:
Countywide
Subject
Adopt the updated County Procurement Policy, including clarifications to spending thresholds and the addition of the federal eligibility verification requirements. (No general fund impact) (Pistochini/Murphy)
Recommended Action
Adopt the updated County Procurement Policy, including clarifications to spending thresholds and the addition of the federal eligibility verification requirements.
Strategic Plan Goal(s)
![]() |
Operational Excellence |
![]() |
In Support of All Goals (Internal Departments Only) |
Reason for Recommended Action/Background
The Procurement Division conducts periodic reviews and updates to the County’s Procurement Policy to ensure continuous improvement, alignment with applicable state and federal procurement requirements, and implementation of direction provided by the Board of Supervisors. These updates are essential to promoting transparency, consistency, compliance, and efficient operational practices.
The Procurement Policy was last updated in January 2025. Following a comprehensive review and incorporation of feedback received by County departments, two revisions are recommended to enhance clarity and strengthen compliance with federal procurement standards.
The proposed policy revisions are as follows:
1. Clarification of County Spending Thresholds — Updates have been made to clarify how estimated amounts are applied when determining appropriate procurement methods.
For contracts, the estimated amount is defined as the amount per year.
For purchase orders, the estimated amount is defined as the annual amount per vendor.
This clarification is intended to eliminate ambiguity, ensure consistent interpretation among departments, and promote uniform application of procurement requirements.
2. Federal System for Award Management (SAM) Verification Requirement
The proposed new policy language requires verification that any vendor receiving a contract valued at $25,000 or greater is eligible under the federal System for Award Management (SAM) database prior to contract execution. This requirement aligns with federal procurement regulations and ensures the County engages only with vendors that are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise ineligible for federal funding.
The proposed changes to the Procurement Policy are shown in track changes in Attachment A and the final version without the tracked changes is provided in Attachment B.
The Procurement Policy was last updated in January 2025. Following a comprehensive review and incorporation of feedback received by County departments, two revisions are recommended to enhance clarity and strengthen compliance with federal procurement standards.
The proposed policy revisions are as follows:
1. Clarification of County Spending Thresholds — Updates have been made to clarify how estimated amounts are applied when determining appropriate procurement methods.
For contracts, the estimated amount is defined as the amount per year.
For purchase orders, the estimated amount is defined as the annual amount per vendor.
This clarification is intended to eliminate ambiguity, ensure consistent interpretation among departments, and promote uniform application of procurement requirements.
2. Federal System for Award Management (SAM) Verification Requirement
The proposed new policy language requires verification that any vendor receiving a contract valued at $25,000 or greater is eligible under the federal System for Award Management (SAM) database prior to contract execution. This requirement aligns with federal procurement regulations and ensures the County engages only with vendors that are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise ineligible for federal funding.
The proposed changes to the Procurement Policy are shown in track changes in Attachment A and the final version without the tracked changes is provided in Attachment B.
Collaborations (including Board advisory groups and external partner agencies)
General Services collaborated with the Department of Finance, County Counsel, the County Administrator, and the District Attorney's Office.
Competitive Bid Process/Vendor Performance
No competitive bid process or vendor performance is necessary for this policy update.
Fiscal Impact
No Fiscal Impact
Fiscal Impact (Expenditure)
- Total cost of recommended action:
- $
- Amount budgeted for expenditure:
- $
- Additional expenditure authority needed:
- $
- On-going commitment (annual cost):
- $
Source of Funds for this Expenditure
- General Fund
- $0
Attachments
Form Review
| Inbox | Reviewed By | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Ryan Pistochini | Ryan Pistochini | 12/01/2025 10:31 AM |
| Financial Services | David Estrada | 12/01/2025 10:59 AM |
| County Counsel | Kimberly Hood | 12/02/2025 09:34 AM |
| Cindy Perez | Cindy Perez | 12/02/2025 11:27 AM |
- Form Started By:
- Tonia Murphy
- Started On:
- 11/17/2025 12:00 PM
- Final Approval Date:
- 12/02/2025
.png)
